Thank you sir for summing up my thoughts rather well.Brad Shepard said:People need to learn to take a damn joke.
How salty are people going to get over a catchphrase before the world's noodle supply has no flavor left?
Thank you sir for summing up my thoughts rather well.Brad Shepard said:People need to learn to take a damn joke.
DVS BSTrD said:Sorry I don't find beating a woman funny.Brad Shepard said:People need to learn to take a damn joke.
she gets punched and kicked in the face and then impaled on a spike, I haven't played any god of war and scene very little but I have seen kartos tearing off body parts from an enemy just to then impale them on it. I have also seen him gut several enemies alive. The scene also shows you beat up an illusion not a actual demon, and like many people have said the achievement is for the guy helping you and portraying his mothers. Also how many male characters have been brutally murdered and had achievements to mock their deaths.The trophy, awarded once Kratos has finished pummeling a female antagonist in a shockingly violent scene even by God of War standards, was first called out by reviewer, Adam Sessler.
Spare your condescension as well. At the end of the day, believe what *you* want to. Ask: does it offend *you*? If it doesn't, that's fine. It actually doesn't even offend me. But when you appeal to nuance, you also ignore anyone who might find it offensive (and there is actually fair enough cause to).Madara XIII said:I wasn't aware women were beyond logic, a sense of humour, and thinking like other people. My mistake, I should have realized that I was living in a bubble, and that women were some completely different species that thinks in ways I can't even imagine with my feeble male brain.
Don't you go and put words in my mouth, especially when that statement can in no way be interpreted in what I said.Alex Mac said:Spare your condescension as well. At the end of the day, believe what *you* want to. Ask: does it offend *you*? If it doesn't, that's fine. It actually doesn't even offend me. But when you appeal to nuance, you also ignore anyone who might find it offensive (and there is actually fair enough cause to).Madara XIII said:I wasn't aware women were beyond logic, a sense of humour, and thinking like other people. My mistake, I should have realized that I was living in a bubble, and that women were some completely different species that thinks in ways I can't even imagine with my feeble male brain.
"I wasn't aware women were beyond..." doesn't come off as a statement championing the intellect of women, as well. It comes off as arrogance and condescension. "I thought women were better but.." Etc, etc.
People are nuanced, yes. And it's the exact thing that makes them have varied responses. Including those you don't agree with or understand. And the latter point is salient. You think you know what a woman might think? How? Why? Are you one? If not, why are you even talking about what a woman (or, worse, women as a group) might think?
Secondly how about you quit trying to speak for the people you THINK are offended by this.Alex Mac said:Spare your condescension as well. At the end of the day, believe what *you* want to. Ask: does it offend *you*? If it doesn't, that's fine. It actually doesn't even offend me. But when you appeal to nuance, you also ignore anyone who might find it offensive (and there is actually fair enough cause to).Madara XIII said:I wasn't aware women were beyond logic, a sense of humour, and thinking like other people. My mistake, I should have realized that I was living in a bubble, and that women were some completely different species that thinks in ways I can't even imagine with my feeble male brain.
"I wasn't aware women were beyond..." doesn't come off as a statement championing the intellect of women, as well. It comes off as arrogance and condescension. "I thought women were better but.." Etc, etc.
People are nuanced, yes. And it's the exact thing that makes them have varied responses. Including those you don't agree with or understand. And the latter point is salient. You think you know what a woman might think? How? Why? Are you one? If not, why are you even talking about what a woman (or, worse, women as a group) might think?
It's not *really* sexist. While the wording is derogatory, the message behind it is "Friends before lovers." It's just the same as:Brad Shepard said:People need to learn to take a damn joke.
Really? You call your lovers Ho's?Danny Ocean said:It's not *really* sexist. While the wording is derogatory, the message behind it is "Friends before lovers." It's just the same as:Brad Shepard said:People need to learn to take a damn joke.
Chicks before dicks
or
Sisters before misters.
I find it hard to believe that were either of those implemented in a game there would be any outcry.
"Wasn't even there to begin with" cannot be a true statement if people found offense there. People did. They can, say, presume wrongly upon the intentions or beliefs of SCE Santa Monica employees but if the thing offended them, they're not suddenly wrong to take offense merely because you don't believe a problem exists. "I don't see the problem" doesn't mean nothing's there. It just means you don't see it or agree with it. Nothing more.Madara XIII said:I fail to see the problem other than Adam bringing a "sexist issue" to light that wasn't even there to begin with.
I don't need to try. And I mostly certainly don't need to speak for people who I *think* are offended. I can speak about the people who actually are offended and why. And I can certainly talk about reasons why, bare minimum, I'm able to see where people might be offended.Madara XIII said:Secondly how about you quit trying to speak for the people you THINK are offended by this.