Jumping_Over_Fences said:
LimaBravo said:
28 Days Later was controversial for me because the tosser director claimed it wasnt a zombie movie, and the scriptwriter and storyboarders ripped off half a dozen much much much better zombie movies and stories to make that heap of pants that only todays emo kids could love.
People get pissed off whenever anyone challenges the status quo.
p.s. How was Watchmen controversial ?
28 Days Later had not one zombie in the entire film. Therefore, 28 Days Later is not a zombie movie. Sure it took influences from zombie movies, but that does not make it a zombie film. There was also a love story, which borrows elements from many romantic movies, but I don't think that you would call it a romantic film even though it borrows those elements.
Also, I am not even close to being emo and I love that film.
KK wiki to the rescue :-
A zombie is a creature that appears in folklore and popular culture typically as a reanimated corpse or a mindless human being.
Effectively any human eating/attacking corpse/plague victim/possesed individuals are by definition both literally and in genre zombies. I can say Halo is nothing like Doom that doesnt make it true.
No 28 Days Later doesnt take influences it takes scenes en masse.
The lead character Mark awakens into the opening scene from Day of The Triffids.
He wanders about a bit until he finds a church with baddies inside *cough* The Last Man On Earth (The original I am Legend)with Vincent Price.
Then he wanders up a tower block and finds a man and his daughter, I Spied a Pale Horse by Mark Timlim.
Black Cab I cant remember if thats I Spied A Pale Horse or '48 by James Herbert.
Tunnels blah blah blah
WHITE horse running through field Guess what book thats from.
The last half hour is dangerously close to anything made by Romero.
Boyle is lucky he wasnt sued.