USSR said:
More judgmental than ignorant.
The fact you said called him fat over 9 times on the first page, including a "fattie" comment which is literally making fun of him, is sad.
So, you're the expert, you tell me: How do we call a guy who eats and eats and neglects himself for years untill he is obese, and then actually kills someone out of utter lazyness and because he's so fat?
I can think of worse accurate charactisations for Daniel Cole. Like murderer, because he's got blood on his hands and even had the nerve to tell the media he would kill another unarmed person wearing handcuffs if he was given the chance. That's right, he's expressed a desire to murder, and is still working for the police.
Angry Juju said:
He didn't murder her, And her slamming her head into the floor wasn't his intentions.
Which is why he should be convicted of manslaughter, but not murder.
gof22 said:
How is running the only logical choice?
The alternative is spending a good part of your life in prison under bad or barbaric conditions. Obviously a short run towards freedom makes sense in that situation.
Abandon4093 said:
For one thing, the cop didn't kill her.
He conciously made the decision to inflict grave bodily harm (because he's been told what tasers do at training) and someone is braindead as a result. He killed her. It's clearly manslaughter.
Final First said:
Actually the only logical choice is to not break the law, thus it's her fault.
So basically you're saying every criminal from a shoplifter to a fraudster should be summarily executed without a trial, because after all, they broke the law?
Reconsider.
Final First said:
She's in a vegetative state, not dead.
Braindead, thus dead.
Final First said:
Also, this was an accident because the officer did not intend at all to kill her, just subdue her.
Which is why he is guilty of manslaughter, but not murder.