Corporal Punishment: Have we let othe kid's down on discipline?

Recommended Videos

Yan007

New member
Jan 31, 2011
262
0
0
saint of m said:
I feel spanking should be the nuclear bomb option, the last option you use when all else fails.
Fitting choice of words. Indeed, hitting children destroys your relationship.
 

OldGus

New member
Feb 1, 2011
226
0
0
First post, and not good with advice (and also not a parent, merely a 3,000-mile distant uncle.)
I figure since I'm not good at telling people what they should do, I instead should share a little anecdote.
I always felt proud of my elders mainly because me and my siblings grew up with 7 of them, and almost all of them taught by example. The oldest, least often parented by, but still most respected, was my great grandmother. She taught us all that niceness and doing what's proper and right are not just worth the world, but will win almost any battle you have; she also taught us that when those wouldn't do, being as stubborn as her would.
Next, Grandpa, was the cool elder. He hadn't just been a fighter pilot, he still is a pilot, and he had also been a police officer, a security guard, the head of his own security firm, and an instructor that now teaches people how to calmly keep flying and not crash when they can't see their wingtips, and occasionally just talks with CEOs and movie stars. Oddly enough, he taught us two lessons: humility, by him always being more proud of his family or friends' achievements than his own; second, again by his own example, that pictures can solve a lot more than bombs and guns.
Next, Nana, my Quebecois grandmother. Apart from teaching us the values of travel and learning at least one extra language, not to mention greetings and the like in at least 6, she taught us the sweet taste of both helping others, and rewards for doing well (mostly in the form of cookies and crepes.)
Number 4, Gramma was while we were growing up the nurse, farmer, and master chef. She taught us all the value of a hard-day's work, the importance of not just eating healthy but eating well, and has an almost encyclopedic knowledge both of cooking, and of treating various sicknesses, injuries and ailments. She also was more than happy to teach us if we helped, or help us when we got hurt or sick. More recently, she has taught us how to always be positive, even when we have trouble doing the things we love.
Grandad, her deep, deep South Georgian husband, was a great deal of things. He was, just to name a few things, a farmer's boy, an MP, a quartermaster, a fisherman, an amazing father, and an even better grandfather. He easily taught us never to give up, always to work hard; that sometimes the easy thing to do is run away, the right thing to do is step in, and the best thing to do is escape and then come back, and that these are different for different situations; that even if everyone is not equal now, they deserve to be treated equally, that as far as treating human beings like human beings, there is no rich, poor, black, white, Catholic, Baptist, Jewish, Muslim, nationality or language barrier; and that even when no one will listen to being told what to do, they will happily listen to a good story that will teach them that.
Next, Mom, was always the teacher. She taught us that sometimes you just have to suck it up. She taught us that sometimes you have to know to be quiet, sometimes you have to know to speak up, and sometimes you have to learn. She taught us that one of the most important things to do was keep learning, from all sides. She taught us that its best to use wit and humor because people will listen to that a lot better than criticism. She taught us to exercise our minds because they would outlast our bodies, and to exercise our bodies so they last longer. Well, she was a good mom, so she taught us a lot of things.
Last, there was Dad. We remembered him as the strong man, both in stature and character. Mainly because our fondest memories would include him carrying sometimes all 4 of us around the house at once. He taught us how to be comfortable no matter where we were. He taught us that the world around us deserves respect, even things as simple as plants we use for food (incidentally, he also taught us a lot of plants and animals we could use as food). He taught us how to smile when the storm is all around you. He taught us that laughter is the best medicine, and a kind word the second best. He taught us to stand up for others and for what's right even when we knew it would get ourselves hurt, and that standing up for ourselves sometimes means sitting down. He had studied martial arts, especially Judo, for a long time, and taught us how to fight, to know when to fight, not to use fighting words, to not respond to fighting words, to finish fights when we have to, but most of all, to feel ashamed of ourselves for not preventing fights. I know there are a million other things they taught us, but I'm sure I'm boring you with just the important ones for me.

Now, I realize anyone who put up with that wall of text enough to read this far will notice I didn't once mention whether any of them hit us while we were being raised, or used corporal punishment of any kind. I have a different question for you. Does that really matter?
 

Jodah

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,280
0
0
If used correctly yes, kids could use a good backhand. It just depends what the kid did and the parent can NEVER do it in anger. If the spanking is done in anger, it is reinforcing bad behavior.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Blitzwing said:
spartan231490 said:
Blitzwing said:
spartan231490 said:
Blitzwing said:
I?m afraid anecdotal evidence isn?t good enough.
Why not? Anecdotal evidence was the birth of modern science, and is usually more than enough to draw the correct conclusion. For example, we have absolutely no proof of gravity except anecdotal evidence. We have theories about what causes it(graviton) but we can't find any. The only proof of gravity is that it's there.
mare.

No it wasn?t the theory of gravity was proven through years of study not by stories.
Science defines anecdotal evidence as
"Information that is not based on facts or careful study

"Non-scientific observations or studies, which do not provide proof but may assist research efforts

"Reports or observations of usually unscientific observers

"Casual observations or indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis"

"Information passed along by word-of-mouth but not documented scientifically"

So no anecdotal evidence was not ? the birth of modern science.?
You can define anecdotal evidence all you want, but let me ask you this: What is the quantitative difference between the "scientific observation" that proved gravity, and a "Non-scientific observation"? Answer, nothing. You can discount anecdotal evidence all you want, I'll admit the fact that another human being is likely smart enough to have eyes and use them at the same time, and not ignore relevant data just because it was found through "casual observation."


The difference is that the scientific observation presented evidence to back its claim.

The scientific method requires observations of nature to formulate and test hypotheses. It
consists of these steps:


1. Asking a question about a natural phenomenon
2. Making observations of the phenomenon
3. Hypothesizing an explanation for the phenomenon
4. Predicting a logical consequence of the hypothesis
5. Testing the hypothesis by an experiment, an observational study, or a field study
6. Creating a conclusion with data gathered in the experiment
Yet you continue to ignore the fact that in many cases, especially gravity, the only evidence presented by the scientific method is observations or, anecdotal evidence. Yeah, you don't think it's anecdotal cuz it's made by scientists, funny thing is, scientists are people too. Let's just agree to disagree on this one.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
How are kids "out of control"?

Is it because you see them acting up more often now? Well guess what, when you were a kid, you were the one acting up, you or your friends. And of course, you might say "Oh, I was a saint!". Almost every kid thinks that. Kids are absolutely wonderful at justifying things, and then forgetting about them.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,623
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Blitzwing said:
spartan231490 said:
Blitzwing said:
spartan231490 said:
Blitzwing said:
I?m afraid anecdotal evidence isn?t good enough.
Why not? Anecdotal evidence was the birth of modern science, and is usually more than enough to draw the correct conclusion. For example, we have absolutely no proof of gravity except anecdotal evidence. We have theories about what causes it(graviton) but we can't find any. The only proof of gravity is that it's there.
mare.

No it wasn?t the theory of gravity was proven through years of study not by stories.
Science defines anecdotal evidence as
"Information that is not based on facts or careful study

"Non-scientific observations or studies, which do not provide proof but may assist research efforts

"Reports or observations of usually unscientific observers

"Casual observations or indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis"

"Information passed along by word-of-mouth but not documented scientifically"

So no anecdotal evidence was not ? the birth of modern science.?
You can define anecdotal evidence all you want, but let me ask you this: What is the quantitative difference between the "scientific observation" that proved gravity, and a "Non-scientific observation"? Answer, nothing. You can discount anecdotal evidence all you want, I'll admit the fact that another human being is likely smart enough to have eyes and use them at the same time, and not ignore relevant data just because it was found through "casual observation."


The difference is that the scientific observation presented evidence to back its claim.

The scientific method requires observations of nature to formulate and test hypotheses. It
consists of these steps:


1. Asking a question about a natural phenomenon
2. Making observations of the phenomenon
3. Hypothesizing an explanation for the phenomenon
4. Predicting a logical consequence of the hypothesis
5. Testing the hypothesis by an experiment, an observational study, or a field study
6. Creating a conclusion with data gathered in the experiment
Yet you continue to ignore the fact that in many cases, especially gravity, the only evidence presented by the scientific method is observations or, anecdotal evidence. Yeah, you don't think it's anecdotal cuz it's made by scientists, funny thing is, scientists are people too. Let's just agree to disagree on this one.
However, the thing you are most disregarding here is: That anecdotal evidence? Yeah, in science? It's an experience usually experienced by more than one individual observing at the same time that the phenomenon occurs. Not just the mere voice of one person, but several persons with intimate knowledge of the topic in which to debate and verify between personal observations of the phenomenon and come to a relatively working conclusion until further experimentation.

OT: Lot's of rose-tinted glasses in this thread, apparently. Violence against children does not make your children more obedient in a good way, it tends to make them fear you in a negative manner and begin to view your love as something that fleets and returns with every strike. In which case, many children whom experience this tend to be in abusive relationships themselves where they will strike their significant other if they say something they don't agree with, attempting to assert obedience like their parents taught them through their own actions to resort to.

Children are a far varied sort, and not one sort of punishment is ever an end-all of bad behavior from them.
 

Lonan

New member
Dec 27, 2008
1,243
0
0
I've heard that males who had corporal punishment between the ages of 3-7 are more successful than those who did not. It was the case with me.
 

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
ApeShapeDeity said:
When I was a boy I was sent to a Jesuit school. The cane was a standard disciplinary tool.

Read: I got my arse beat.

In that context, I respected my elders and the law... (well, mostly)

Kids these days are seriously out of control because they know that can't be touched. Not unless the parent/guardian/other is willing to face nearly universal scorn.

I have a daughter, and while I don't hit her, ever, I make sure she knows who's in charge. I make sure that if she won't behave herself or if she choses to be disrespectful, she will not get what she wants.

BUT...

I put it to you, does corporal punishment need a return to form? If not, why not?

Edit: Yes, I do know of the supurfluous 'o' but my keyboard is very old. Sometimes it does wierd shit.

Edit 2: My point in this discussion is to foster debate on an important issue. The arse whompin's I recived as a kid, thaught me that that was an accptable mode of social interaction. After many years, many brutal fights and military service, I feel that I've learned better. This is just an opinion. I apreciate, other people's experiences are widely varied.
No, because it doesn't work. Corporal punishment is short-term and short-term only.
 

DaHero

New member
Jan 10, 2011
789
0
0
Go play a round of any online game and tell me parents are doing the right thing, you'll never be able to honestly say it. My kids are going to learn what respect and discipline are before they'll ever be able to go online. I'll NEVER allow my kids to act as ridiculous as the people online today. First sign of troll/flame I get their net is going off for a week, and that's if I didn't hear them raging over a mic. ESRB isn't going to rule my parenting, neither is the government.
 

soulsabr

New member
Oct 9, 2008
190
0
0
baker80 said:
Beating your children is really only going to teach them one thing: Violence is perfectly acceptable, as long as you were really angry when you did it.
I completely agree with you. If you beat a child they learn only beatings. However, a good spanking is no where NEAR a beating.

<youtube=nOAjAWToYMI>