First: USA would be without a army or be able to pull a military response in some time. Second all the world economy would go down. Third and best part...No more Michael Bay movies.Lazier Than Thou said:I don't understand why that would be a bad thing.oliveira8 said:Not if they nuke: DC, New York and LA you won't.xmetatr0nx said:Well yea, but we shoot back.oliveira8 said:Just nuke them. Easy and cheap.
No Pentagon/Mr. President, no Wall Street and no Holywood!
You expect that nuking 3 of our largest cities will prevent us from firing our nukes that are stored in the most remote regions of our country? Losing the President would not be a serious blow to the military, there are a multitude of failsafes in place for just such an occasion.oliveira8 said:Not if they nuke: DC, New York and LA you won't.xmetatr0nx said:Well yea, but we shoot back.oliveira8 said:Just nuke them. Easy and cheap.
No Pentagon/Mr. President, no Wall Street and no Holywood!
KSarty said:Yes it would. No head of governt/military, population without money and no Director to stroke the military ego.Lazier Than Thou said:You expect that nuking 3 of our largest cities will prevent us from firing our nukes that are stored in the most remote regions of our country? Losing the President would not be a serious blow to the military, there are a multitude of failsafes in place for just such an occasion.oliveira8 said:Not if they nuke: DC, New York and LA you won't.xmetatr0nx said:Well yea, but we shoot back.oliveira8 said:Just nuke them. Easy and cheap.
No Pentagon/Mr. President, no Wall Street and no Holywood!
You would be so heartbroken, that you would just nuke the rest of the country out of sheer sadness.
true, but nowadays if a small armarda of warships managed too get past the US Navy, they could quite easily soften up targets in the coast. you dont have those liberty's in central regions.KSarty said:Not necessarily. The coastal regions have the densest population, so they would probably face the largest amount of resistance on the coasts.Insanum said:You could invade the more coastal areas but places like denver would become strongholds.
You think the US citizens would wait for the army? Really? We got a bunch of guns, we got a bunch of bullets and, now, we have a bunch of targets. What more needs to be said?oliveira8 said:First: USA would be without a army or be able to pull a military response in some time. Second all the world economy would go down. Third and best part...No more Michael Bay movies.Lazier Than Thou said:I don't understand why that would be a bad thing.oliveira8 said:Not if they nuke: DC, New York and LA you won't.xmetatr0nx said:Well yea, but we shoot back.oliveira8 said:Just nuke them. Easy and cheap.
No Pentagon/Mr. President, no Wall Street and no Holywood!
The economy right now is not bad. Did you read the story of the great depression? This is nowhere close.Lazier Than Thou said:You think the US citizens would wait for the army? Really? We got a bunch of guns, we got a bunch of bullets and, now, we have a bunch of targets. What more needs to be said?oliveira8 said:First: USA would be without a army or be able to pull a military response in some time. Second all the world economy would go down. Third and best part...No more Michael Bay movies.Lazier Than Thou said:I don't understand why that would be a bad thing.oliveira8 said:Not if they nuke: DC, New York and LA you won't.xmetatr0nx said:Well yea, but we shoot back.oliveira8 said:Just nuke them. Easy and cheap.
No Pentagon/Mr. President, no Wall Street and no Holywood!
The economy wouldn't be too big of a hurdle to get over for us. I mean, long term it would suck, but with the monetary policy of the current and former administration have more or less destroyed the economy anyway. A nuke would just be a fitting end.