Could you send a friend to prison?

Recommended Videos

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
OptimusPrime33 said:
Depends on the crime, if they killed someone or held possession of marijuana yes. But if they were just drunk driving no.
wait what!

a little pot is up there with murder to you meanwhile drunk driving is no big deal :O WTH??!?

pots bearly illigal to begin with if you get caught all they do is take it away hell there is even a big festival every years celibrating it
 

thepyrethatburns

New member
Sep 22, 2010
454
0
0
I would need clearly defined examples rather than "illegal and objectionable".

Since people have brought up murder a lot...

There was a former CEO at the company I work at. Gutted thousands of jobs here when not shipping them overseas. Would buy up companies and then fire everyone but the bare minimum of staff. Everyone else, he lowered their wages while raising his wages and bonuses. He was thrown out when certain ethics abuses became too much for the board to continue covering up and he still got his golden parachute.

If my best friend burst through my door and said "Dude, I saw [that CEO] at a crosswalk and I was so distracted by my mental debate of whether or not to hit the brakes that I didn't hit the brakes. Noone saw me but I freaked and put the body in my trunk then drove here. What should I do?"

In this situation, I'd calm him down. Then we'd get about 2 gallons of gas, take the body to a field with an empty oil drum, put the body and the gas in the drum in that order, then light it and drive off. Just to be sure, I'd then help scrub out the trunk. Maybe buy my friend a beer afterwards.

The point of this example (other than to illustrate that I wouldn't mind some people being shuffled off this mortal coil prematurely) is that I would need a more specific example than "illegal and objectionable" because there are always exceptions to the rule and there's further that I would go for some friends than others.
 

Gigano

Whose Eyes Are Those Eyes?
Oct 15, 2009
2,281
0
0
Not unless I was legally required to do so.

True friends don't come cheap. I'd berate them and do what I could to steer them off the course, and I wouldn't actively protect them; but nor would I sell them out.
 
May 29, 2011
1,179
0
0
Depends. DId something small? Hell no, a criminal record would mess with his life. Did something unacceptable? I don't know. Probably. Nobody really knows answers to questions like that on a whim. (most)People who claim they do would react quite differently in a real situation.
 
May 29, 2011
1,179
0
0
aba1 said:
Akytalusia said:
it's circumstantial. if it was a crime against another human, then i probably would. if it was a victimless crime, then fuck no.
It wouldn't be a crime if it was victimless
Tons of "crimes" are victimless. Especially in countries this sites users don't usually come from.
 

BlueberryMUNCH

New member
Apr 15, 2010
1,892
0
0
Yes, I would, and yes, I have done.
End of the day, it was for their own good, and the good of others.
 

ZeroDotZero

New member
Sep 18, 2009
646
0
0
Probably not. I could, but I doubt I would want to. It is up to the law to enforce justice, and I most likely would not like to see a good friend locked away.
 

GigaHz

New member
Jul 5, 2011
525
0
0
As many have said it depends on the crime and it depends on the quality of friend.

I would be a hypocrite if I ratted out my friends for illegal activity as I, and I'm sure a good number of you, have done enough time in the shady department.

It's just that I don't tend to associate with anyone stupid enough to get caught, or spineless enough to rat on people.

But for extreme cases..

Murder: Maybe if the victim deserved what was coming would I keep it under wraps. It's a big stretch but you can't deny that some people in this world are beyond help or persuasion. In most cases, I would turn them in.

Rape: I'd try to keep the incident self contained if they were a close friend, if only to attempt to resolve it internally. If they weren't a close friend, I'd probably give them a piece of my mind and maybe turn them in if they didn't do it themselves.

Robbery: Depends on the scale. If its breaking into a house and stealing someones hard-earned possessions, I'd probably turn them in. If it was something extreme like a Bank, I would be impressed that they would have the skill and ability to pull it off successfully. And considering that the companies who run the Banks have a ridiculous amount of money to begin with, the bank should be able to recoup the damages pretty easily. Almost a victimless crime.

Drugs: Dealing, no. Producing, no. Smuggling, maybe if children were involved. Mainly because those involved are at a high risk of being found out anyway, or killed. Serves no purpose to rat them out unless you really have it out for them.
 

thepyrethatburns

New member
Sep 22, 2010
454
0
0
Blitzwing said:
There are no exceptions. No one has the right to a take another life regardless of how immoral they think that life was.
That is a point of view but it is not one I share. Given that the rich and powerful already believe themselves to have the right to destroy/end lives, I would have no problem if the favor is occasionally returned.
 

Spygon

New member
May 16, 2009
1,105
0
0
Nope as anything done by one of my friends stays in house so me and my friends will sort it out.
 

Jedoro

New member
Jun 28, 2009
5,393
0
0
Akytalusia said:
it's circumstantial. if it was a crime against another human, then i probably would. if it was a victimless crime, then fuck no.
This, especially if the dumb son of a ***** victimized me.
 

Zakarath

New member
Mar 23, 2009
1,244
0
0
Depends on the circumstances, but in general, if they had done something that illegal, then they wouldn't be my friends.
 

Fugitive Panda

New member
Jan 21, 2011
119
0
0
There are three levels to this. If it was victimless and generally inconsequential, like taking an apple from a grocery store, or doing lesser drugs, no, I wouldn't really care. It's definitely not worth the effort to get authorities involved for what will amount to a small fine or slap on the wrist.

If it was something bigger that could be real trouble for both my hypothetical friend and the victim, like stealing a bike, cash, or, yes, even a game system, I'd confront them about it. If they're my friend I'd have a bit of faith in them not to do it again.

If it was a crime directly against another person, like assault/rape/murder or large fund theft, I'd report them without a second thought. They're not my friend at that point.
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
Use_Imagination_here said:
aba1 said:
Akytalusia said:
it's circumstantial. if it was a crime against another human, then i probably would. if it was a victimless crime, then fuck no.
It wouldn't be a crime if it was victimless
Tons of "crimes" are victimless. Especially in countries this sites users don't usually come from.
I can see in less developed countries like in the middle east but as far the US, Canada and alot of the europian countries go I really don't think there are any victimless crimes and even in the countries where there are I am sure they would argue elsewise saying things like being gay hurts others and stupid crap like that. However all arguing aside I see you point