Where did he say that games are designed for people with psychological issues.JudgeGame said:I find it hard to believe you are actually claiming videogames are designed for people with troubling psychological issues. Do you think this is the right time to hold that frankly ignorant opinion? Did you really need to share that gem considering the circumstances?veloper said:You lose the argument then.JudgeGame said:I'm sorry I can't continue talking to you. You're creeping me out.veloper said:There's manga artists who draw tentacle rape scenes to intentionally convey sadistic power over young women and teenagers and they get away with that too. Not my thing, but there's even a niche for that shit.JudgeGame said:That's not what I'm talking about at all. Tone is just the emotions that the creator is trying to convey through stylistic choices.veloper said:Well that's unfortunate for you, but unless you can prove some kind of sinister propaganda going on here, you won't get anywhere.JudgeGame said:I'm tired of people pretending that in the medium of videogames tone doesn't apply.veloper said:You guys are overthinking this. It doesn't matter if the cyborg chick is the villain or not, or that the cops are fascists or not.
The perspective of fictional characters does NOT represent the views of the creators. Disclaimers of that nature are fairly common for good reason it seems. This is FICTION afteral and complaining about the presence of evil in a fictional setting, is like complaining there's swastikas and nazis in a WW2 movie.
While fiction can go wrong, if it goes all political and the intended message is also backwards, at this point nothing suggests anything like that.
Just some shock value here. No big deal.
This stuff will probably sell and that's the bottom line.
This sexism in fiction complaint is one lost cause I don't mind seeing crashing against the cliffs.
Boobs are allowed and boobs sell. You cannot fight this thing. Even if you boycott such games, there's a big enough audience that doesn't care or even loves this shit.
This mild, titilating cyberpunk stuff is just mainstream advertisement.
Where it has no place in civil society, the forbidden thought finds it's home in the realm of fantasy. Gamers don't turn to videogames in search for conformity and morality. Games is where we can let ourselves go without harming anyone.
Fetish porn simply exists; it's a simple fact and if that shocks you already, then prepare to live your life in a state of shock. I didn't even go into any detail here, nor did I praise the genre.
Seriously, you're already fighting a lost cause and you're not even putting up a proper fight.
I forgot which side of the argument I'm defending.
take this example:
Crashing threw a crowded shopping mall with a truck, running over houndreds in the process would be an attrocity. Nobody who is right in their mind would do or even want to do something like that. Because there is such a thing as empathy.
In games like GTA or Saints Row players do something like that on a regular basis. This doesn't make tham Psychopaths, because they are well aware that they ramming pixels into pixels. They are aware no one is harmed and can enjoy it as a spectacle. Fantasy violence can be enjoyable without serious psychosis. If you are creeped out by that you have clearly not spent any attention to any entertainment put out in the last 4000 years or so.
Oh, and by the way: The point where people are unable to separate fantasy violence from real violence and/or take joy out of real violence would be one where we can talk psychosis.
The trailer had left many people looking forward to this game. So I would say the advert failed on any conceivable level. What was going on threwout the trailer seemed pretty clear to me and everyone I know.JudgeGame said:[...] You are defending an advert that fails on every conceivable level to perform the functions expected of an advert and on top of that it has a truly disturbing ending shot.![]()
Also: The ending shot is ment to be disturbing. It resembles an execution becaused it is supposed to resemble one. Oppressive/shady authorities, violent and ruthless police forces, general moral ambiguity, ludacrious crime rates, expendableness of human live and many other things are common setpieces of cyberpunk scenarios. Just look at Judge Dredd. This should not be news to you.
Perhaps you could also take into account, that the beauty of the woman is supposedly achieved through cybernetics and plastic surgery, rendering the uncorrupted beauty somewhat an illusion.OniaPL said:Now, this may be slightly off topic but I am interested anyways.Draech said:Snip
At first you can see just the normal parts of the woman, and then it slowly pans so that you can see the scythe- arms and bodies.
When I watched the trailer I thought it was more about the female representing beauty and the softer sides of humanity (as feminine characters usually do), and it being contrasted with the metal blades and bodies to show how the advancement in technology and such has corrupted this beauty and twisted the natural parts of humanity.
And I thought the people in complete black armor so that no skin or anything can be seen, who were firing their guns, was supposed to show the tougher, darker emotionless characters (representing the tough, cold but enduring aspects of humanity) terminating this corruption but sacrificing the beauty in the process.
What I was interested in was, what made you go to the Order vs. Chaos interpretation? Did it just come to your head or? IT was very well thought out.