Because one's I.Q. has no bearing on their ability to parent--or anything else, for that matter. It's a number arrogant twats like to parade around to make themselves feel big.Gearhead mk2 said:Why aren't IQ tests mandatory for parents yet?
Because one's I.Q. has no bearing on their ability to parent--or anything else, for that matter. It's a number arrogant twats like to parade around to make themselves feel big.Gearhead mk2 said:Why aren't IQ tests mandatory for parents yet?
>Turn on XB360Grey Carter said:"He didn't realize it was costing real money," Ghera told the Daily Mail.
That's about $1,800 in USD. How do you even spend that much on DLC for two games? I know those Cawadoody maps are overpriced, but they shouldn't set you back more than $150. I assume the rest is for the Divegrass Simulator, since I know from my own experience with the NHL series that EA tries to sell you lots of little player power ups for small prices. For that kind of cash, he must have really 'roided up his team. How he managed to get so many enhancements without realizing he was spending real world currency is a mystery. Either he honestly never knew, or he did and decided to play stupid when his dad caught him.Grey Carter said:Sam Ghera has sent a complaint to Microsoft after discovering his 12-year-old son, Nik, had been spending up to £100 a day on "Fifa and Call of Duty," racking up a total bill of £1,150 over six months. Ghera only found out about the numerous charges to his credit card when he went to an ATM, only to be told he had insufficient funds to make a withdrawal.
i really don't think playing shooters turns your kid into a violent psychopath, i myself played a lot of quake when i was a kid and the corpses in my basement keep telling me that's not the reason.Realitycrash said:Because most parents think that their children can "handle it", that just THEIR children are "mature enough". Hell, my dad took me to his work back in the early 90's, and while he worked (he was a network technician for a university) I was allowed to sit in the computer-lab and play Doom. I was 9, I think.
Now, if said game had been CoD, I doubt he would have reacted any differently. Why would he? To them, It's a game. You know, game? Fun? Hahaha? And I partially agree. Sure, some things might be inappropriate for a child, but that depends on how mature such child is. I hate to cite anecdotal information as some sort of proof but..Look at me? Been playing violent videogames all my life, and no worse off. So SOME clearly can handle it..
On a related note: When I first got my XBL-account, I needed my dads creditcard. I was 16, and my dad was outraged (and eventually called Microsoft support, located in another country even). Not because I wanted to play Ghost Recon 2 online, but because he was afraid that Microsoft would store his creditcard-information and some hacker would manage to steal it.
Heh.
In the end, I got my own credit-card (couldn't rack up more debt than I had cash,though) and was told that how I wanted to waste my own money was my problem.
So honestly, if I believe my child to be able to handle Call of Duty XXVI (You know there will be one) when he is 14, then I will let him play it. I might of course be wrong, but I doubt it will turn him into a murderer. Might give him nightmares, though.
Also, I'll explain a few things first.
I'm bothered because I'd rather see him playing a better series. If you're referring to a 12 year old playing an M-rated series though, I was playing games that would be rated M now, and watching R-rated action and horror movies by the time I was 9 or 10. While some parents let their young children play games that may not be appropriate for them without ever giving enough of a shit to think about what their kids are playing first, some kids are mature enough to play those games as my parents felt I was. So my default assumption isn't to immediately assume the parent is simply a bad parent because they let their kid play these games. Despite plenty of evidence that this guy didn't think everything through 100% when setting up the account.teebeeohh said:WHY THE FUCK is nobody bothered that the kid plays cod?
Somehow, I doubt he genuinely thought that.Eri said:As usual, completely the parents fault.
Also the kid is retarded for thinking it didn't actually cost money despite the system telling him it did. I know I was fairly dumb at 12, but certainly not to that extent.
True, that's why we should implement a Parent Aptitude Test (I call him Pat, for short) that would use a series of hypothetical situations and financial/employment analysis to determine whether or not someone is fit to be a parent.Clearing the Eye said:Because one's I.Q. has no bearing on their ability to parent--or anything else, for that matter. It's a number arrogant twats like to parade around to make themselves feel big.Gearhead mk2 said:Why aren't IQ tests mandatory for parents yet?
The answer is C, right?rob_simple said:True, that's why we should implement a Parent Aptitude Test (I call him Pat, for short) that would use a series of hypothetical situations and financial/employment analysis to determine whether or not someone is fit to be a parent.Clearing the Eye said:Because one's I.Q. has no bearing on their ability to parent--or anything else, for that matter. It's a number arrogant twats like to parade around to make themselves feel big.Gearhead mk2 said:Why aren't IQ tests mandatory for parents yet?
For example:
You are at the supermarket with your six year old kid. He is screaming the roof down, knocking shit off the shelf and generally being an insufferable little dicksplash. Do you...
A)Start screaming back at him to 'fucking behave yourself, you little prick.'
B)Calmly pull him to one side and tell him this kind of behaviour is unacceptable.
C)Completely ignore him and continue deciding what brand of cheap liquor you want to get shit-faced on this evening.