Wouldn't that be even more expensive? It does kinda cost money to mail stuff, and even with a flat rate box, one that a laptop would fit in would probably cost more than those bullets.Yokai said:Really I think it would have been just as effective if he'd boxed it up on camera and mailed it somewhere far away. Shooting it was a waste of his own money, and valuable, useful electronics.
As I said, its a cultural divide. Don't get me wrong, I'm fond of guns. They're fascinating constructs of mechanics and chemistry, honed from the the most inaccurate canons of chivalric warfare, to the long range rifle accurate to over a kilometre. A gun is not the tool of a moron, despite attracting them in droves. And as most others have pointed out, from a physical saftey perspective (location, choice of ammunition, orientation of target etc); he has fulfilled all the required criteria. I just feel there's been a failure to adhere to a philosophical saftey.Syzygy23 said:It's actually not that big of a deal here in America. Using a gun on an inanimate object? No harm no foul. Using a gun on a person? Call da po-po.Gordon_4 said:See this is a subject on which I sit on the fence. On one hand, I can support %100 what he's trying to achieve: disciplining his daughter for breaking the law of the home, of which he and his wife are basically God. I agree that you don't take guff like her's as a parent, test the boundries all you like just don't get too shocked when the electric fence gets you.Signa said:The people saying this was wrong makes me want to quit this site. I wouldn't be shocked to find that 80% of them are the age of that daughter.
Teenage girls are some of the worst people on the planet, and action like this is absolutely necessary once they go sour. I'm certain that she thinks her dad is a psychopath, but that will change when she finally saves up enough money to replace the laptop. She will gain appreciation for all that he does for her, and a little sweeping and cleaning dirty dishes will seem like a walk to the other side of the house.
My issue is the method. Airing your dirty laundry in public like this is poor form in my opinion. Also, declaration of bias: I'm an Aussie, so limited gun exposure. I find the idea of using a weapon to prove a point when punishing your child for stepping out of line, kinda fucked.
Honestly, if he'd stripped her room of every luxury item and thrown the laptop into a trash compactor, I'd pretty much be with him all the way. I just think using the gun was distasteful, has done nothing other than provoked the wrong kind of debate and put his fellow gun owners under even further scrutiny because he has misused his rights.
It's like if Cthulhu lived on your street corner. It would be mind breakingly terrifying at first, but after about a week you learn to deal with it and it's suddenly not such a big shocker.
The problem I see is that she's really not doing enough to warrant payment. I have to believe that the father's list is the more realistic one - sweep the floors, wipe the counter, make your own bed, do your own laundry, empty the dishwasher - and note the last one. EMPTY the dishwasher. She doesn't even have to HAND WASH the dishes, she just needs to look in the machine every day and put away the dishes if they're clean. There was no talk of dusting, vacuuming, taking care of pets, or really anything that requires more than thirty minutes of work.GeneralFungi said:And how can he scoff at her for wanting to earn a bit of money for her doing chores? What's the difference between giving her nice gifts every once in a while for doing chores (something she would come to expect and get accustomed to) or her earning a small steady sum of cash that she can use to purchase these things herself instead of her father giving it to her directly? She gets all of the satisfaction of earning something she owns while also learning the value of money and the work required to get nice things. And her father doesn't need to pay more then he would usually want to as a side bonus.
bro, chill out. If you'd actually watched some of his other videos you'd understand that this man has a LOT of experience with guns. He did what he did in a calm frame of mind and clearly had all his wits about it. Heck, he talked to his wife about it beforehand so he obviously thought it over and discussed it with someone else instead of being rash. Where you seem to be deluded is that you treat guns as though they're some kind of special tool that deserves a different kind of respect than a sledge hammer or a car. No, guns, like anything else, simply deserve to be used under whatever precautionary measures are necessary to ensure the safety of others. Just because this particular device is designed to rapidly expel a metal object from its chamber doesn't mean he's suddenly an irresponsible asshole for using it to do something that doesn't involve killing something else (its "intended purpose"). Cars are flat out lethal too, but you don't seem to object to him running it over. Now, what I disagree with is the existence of this video. He shouldn't have posted this on facebook at all. He also shouldn't have destroyed the laptop at all. That's a waste. However, I completely agree with the actual message of the vid.Ramzal said:I believe it's an issue because so many people agree with the method he used. A gun is flat out a lethal tool. No one was in danger nor was he protecting anyone or himself. The fact that so many find this acceptable is deplorable. So we use lethal weapons and tools now to prove a point? And at worse, it's childish? Why don't we fire a nuclear weapon into an unpopulated area to show North Korea that we aren't accepting their terms of testing nuclear weapons.
I can understand a blunt object not being as bad or a hammer, or running it over with a car. Granted that all of the above can be lethal, but they weren't made with lethal intent. Honestly, I find as many people as I saw agreeing with this method disturbing. Borderline frightening.
Edit: Although, I think we can all agree to a father punishing his daughter for what he believes to be disrespect.