See, Told ya PETA would come knocking, haha.AntonMTL said:Read and think before getting all worked up!
But, while visually interesting, this video outlines 2 very big problems in Western culture.
1) We have no problem with wasting important things like food for entertainment
2) That we have no problem with animal cruelty especially for entertainment.
Sure the fish was already dead, but it died just to used as a visual joke. That is a wasted life even if it is only fish life. The fact that the fish looked almost alive as it fell in slow-mo just re-articulated these issues in a more evocative way.
Only in the west are we so spoiled that food can be treated this way. Shame.
Yep, it is not animal cruelty by any definition. And I'm not just saying that because a rockfish isn't an animal. Anyway, it isn't fish cruelty either.Slanzinger said:=But still, calling "animal cruelty" on it is going a little far, surely?
...Fish are animals too dude. What I was saying is the fact that if they dropped it live, then it would be animal cruelty. But they didn't. And as the rest of my post said, there's the possibility that the fish didn't go to waste.EchetusXe said:Yep, it is not animal cruelty by any definition. And I'm not just saying that because a rockfish isn't an animal. Anyway, it isn't fish cruelty either.
I wasn't very impressed with it though, and you could say it showed a lack of respect for life and probably was a waste of a perfectly good fish.
Too expensive...because of all the shipping & handling sending them back again and again.snowman6251 said:The 360 is far too expensive an object to just break for shits and giggles. Think of all the broke college students who only have a PS3 and occasionally want to play Halo. Think of us!
i was kinda half expected for the video to freeze-frame eventually and the fish mouth animatedly sing along to "Don't worry, be happy" XDHankMan said:http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/singing-fish-original.jpg