Azaraxzealot said:
http://www.ign.com/videos/2011/01/21/dead-space-2-video-review?objectid=14293265
wish i could just embed the video, but it wont let me get the link.
anyways, i really dont think it deserved such high praise (such as claiming it to be the "best survival horror game of our generation). It doesnt look like survival horror at all, just gears of war with laser guns and zombie-babies.
besides that, im surprised it didnt get a lower score for having bad multiplayer, dont most mainstream reviewers put that as having a LOT of weight in their reviews? well, it looked like a left 4 dead rip-off anyways.
but thats just my opinion, what do you guys think of this?
EDIT: Yeah, i havent played the game yet, both because its not out and because when it does i wont play it because i didnt like the first (i like saving money for good games, thats all). ill give it a chance to surprise me, but ill let my brother buy it first since he's into corporate cash-ins (Cash-In of Duty anyone?). I mostly take issue with the "best survival horror game of our generation" line.
I take it you also like fighting the Man in other ways, eh? You sound like one of those goth kids from South Park. Not every sequel is a cash-in, and if they're done well, then who cares? A good game is a good game. What, is Dragon Age II also a cash-in?
Reviewers only put value on multiplayer when multiplayer is a very large part of the game (like the Call of Duty or Battlefield series). Dead Space is primarily a single-player game, and so reviewers don't put all that much stock in the multiplayer. It also depends on how much the multiplayer is hyped. For Call of Duty, the multiplayer was hyped up a whole lot, so that is what most reviewers based their reviews the game on. For Dead Space, and Dead Space 2, the single player is what is hyped up, so reviewers will focus on that more than the multiplayer.
Are you sure you played the first one? It was pretty darn good, although the easy difficulty made it slightly less fun. Also, I don't know where you get Gears of War from. The game in no way resembles Gears of War. Is it because they have guns? Lots of games have guns in them. Is it the third person perspective? Lots of games do that. There's no cover-based gameplay, so it couldn't be that. Left 4 Dead rip-off? Did you play Left 4 Dead? They are only related in the fact that they are part of the same genre. Maybe if you played the games (there's such a thing as renting, you know) instead of simply going on about how mainstream they are (Hipster Kitty whined about mainstream videogames before everyone else did), you might enjoy something.