There are also a number of issues with this story that are raised by common sense: Did the kids not know how to cook or clean for themselves? The oldest is apparently 13; I was certainly capable of making my own meals, doing laundry, and going to the store on my own by that point. Also, leaving two dog corpses to rot for a couple of months seems a little too shocking to actually be real.
I disagree with this specific point. It wouldn't stand up in court if the children had died and the mother said "Well, they should be able to feed themselves." The feeding of a dependant, which a thirteen year old is, is the responsibility of the parent/guardian. OK, perhaps they should have been taught, but again that is the fault of the mother, not the kids.
However, you are absolutely right in every other respect. The newspapers exagerate in order to demonise.
I believe their primary target, however, was the mother. The game just caught some collateral flak.
I disagree with this specific point. It wouldn't stand up in court if the children had died and the mother said "Well, they should be able to feed themselves." The feeding of a dependant, which a thirteen year old is, is the responsibility of the parent/guardian. OK, perhaps they should have been taught, but again that is the fault of the mother, not the kids.
However, you are absolutely right in every other respect. The newspapers exagerate in order to demonise.
I believe their primary target, however, was the mother. The game just caught some collateral flak.