Soggy_Popcorn said:
If customers aren't supposed to demand anything of suppliers, why is one of the basic economic forces called "DEMAND"?
Demand is the need/want for a product, the product in question being BF3.
Demand is not about asking for the supplier to change their unfinished product 1 month before the end of a 2 year product development. Nor is it demanding to change something of a free service when you as a consumer will buy the finished product either way.
Supply the flipside of Supply and Demand, is all about supplying a product which the consumer wants, consumers want battlefield 3, and consumers will pay for battlefield 3. But customers will not be paying for the beta, and as such the supplier will not want to divert resources to a free service, which they have designed to make their life slightly easier and also help consumers. Especially when diverting resources in such a way to put in the origionally stated map would be detrimental to making their life easier.
The majority of customers will buy BF3 with or without anychanges from this point on, or whether the beta features map A or map B. Because there isn't a product closer to what BF fans want than BF3.
And that is where Dice fit in as suppliers, they supply a general product, not a catered service, but there is no alternative.
Therefor creating the afformentioned demand. ;-)