Higher pain threshold was disproven earlier in the thread. Slower release is questionable as an advantage though longer lasting is obviously an advantage. Don't know enough to comment on the acceleration. Ethical hypocrisy? Probably social if it even exists you'll have to elaborate. Better multitasking as you said up for debate. Allowed to nag and whine is social and I doubt most women have a problem with looking effeminate, also men nag and whine all the time. Not getting conscripted is societal. More intense orgasms is debatable, but definitely an advantage. Less likely to face death penalty is societal. Able to murder their children? I'll assume you're talking abortion which is a far cry from murder. Able to murder spouse? Not true. Divorce laws likely with child custody, and if property is slanted in their favor likely because of the children. 80% of income seems right when you consider that in most households I've seen women are responsible for shopping for necessities like food.PlatonicRapist said:Women have quite a few advantages over men. A higher pain threshold. Slower release and longer lasting adrenaline surges. Higher tolerance to accelleration. Ethical hypocrisy that goes unquestioned. Better multi-tasking (allegedly, not adequately proven). Being socially allowed to nag and whine without looking effeminate. Not getting conscripted. More intense orgasms. Less likely to face the death penalty. Normally able to murder their children without legal penalty. Normally able to murder their spouse without legal penalty. Divorce laws slanted in women's favor for property and child custody. Equal opportunity protection. Longer life span. Dispose of 80% of household income nation wide in the developed world. And the list goes on...
I think you missed the point of this thread as it is intended to be about biological differences and most of your points are societal and not necessarily true.