Do you find incest wrong?

Recommended Videos

Whateveralot

New member
Oct 25, 2010
953
0
0
thaluikhain said:
I dunno, never tried.

A related question, though, do you find the idea of sisters (preferably twins) having sex to be less wrong than other forms of incest? Alot of people seem to for some reason.
Because, well...a "twin" is this pop-cult thingy that's stereotyped to be something all men should want to have sex with at least once in their life. The idea of a twin being together is just for men to imagine being there with them.
 

Thundero13

New member
Mar 19, 2009
2,392
0
0
Two consenting & of age people should be able to do whatever they like, with incest however they shouldn't have their own children, adopt if they must
 

mr-fix_it

New member
Apr 15, 2009
147
0
0
my opinion on sexuality is that if everybody is legal age and everbody agrees on they should be allowed to do whatever the fuck they want. This is includs incest, prostitution and pretend rape as long as everbody is agreeing to do it. So no I don't find it wrong.
 

Thespian

New member
Sep 11, 2010
1,407
0
0
People are free to do what they will with sex, once it's consensual. I can't really blame anyone for falling in love with "the wrong person".
 

Joepow

New member
Jan 10, 2011
162
0
0
tobi the good boy said:
AnubisAuman said:
tobi the good boy said:
Uhm, really? This many people seem to think that having a root with someone related to you is perfectly reasonable?

The very Idea is pretty off putting, this combined with the fact that it's Illegal has lead to my conclusion that, Yes. It is wrong.
You know, some time ago, this arguement could be used for homosexuality.
'

Ha! that's a damn good call. I should be more open minded. Sadly I can't seem to look at incest as being something "Right" because of the genetic defects that can arise from the overlapping of DNA, Homosexuality doesn't cause an issue like this.
They can always use a condom.

Also, it is kinda scary to see so many people who think "I find it repulsive" is a valid argument.
 

Samurai Silhouette

New member
Nov 16, 2009
491
0
0
Wow, it seems like people are willing to fuck anything these days. What's next? Pets? "Ohh, but the puppy loves its owner, and s/he's willing, I don't see anything wrong with that! You're too closed minded!"

You've got to be socially retarded if all you're able to shag are siblings. They will most likely have kids because "they love each other enough". We let this go on, soon we'll be researching ways to cater to the created abominations. Then we'll see a population explosive of mental retards from related parents that don't know how to stick their head out from under the rock they live in. I don't look forward to speaking herp derp in the future.
 

tobi the good boy

New member
Dec 16, 2007
1,229
0
0
AnubisAuman said:
tobi the good boy said:
AnubisAuman said:
tobi the good boy said:
Uhm, really? This many people seem to think that having a root with someone related to you is perfectly reasonable?

The very Idea is pretty off putting, this combined with the fact that it's Illegal has lead to my conclusion that, Yes. It is wrong.
You know, some time ago, this arguement could be used for homosexuality.
'

Ha! that's a damn good call. I should be more open minded. Sadly I can't seem to look at incest as being something "Right" because of the genetic defects that can arise from the overlapping of DNA, Homosexuality doesn't cause an issue like this.
They can always use a condom.

Also, it is kinda scary to see so many people who think "I find it repulsive" is a valid argument.
Condoms break ... bum holes don't?
 

ScreamingNinja

New member
Apr 12, 2011
102
0
0
Filiecs said:
ScreamingNinja said:
Filiecs said:
Stop trying to make it seem like I support the violation of human rights and the torture of animals, because that is not the case.
Sorry brah, but if you're fine with people wacking off to kids, then you've still got some issues.
Under what basis do you hold these claims? I base mine off of our rights to life, liberty, and property, the very things allowing us to voice our opinions without being killled right now.
'Perfectly fine to me, then again I'm also okay with certain forms of beastiality, pedophelia (as long as they stick to masterbation)'

LOLSNAP! That's what I'm basing it off. Get help dude.
 

iblis666

New member
Sep 8, 2008
1,106
0
0
couldnt care less as long as no children are produced from the act

on the other hand if they do produce children than i believe that they and the child need to be castrated
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
With the House of Usher in mind, I have strong disagreements with incest. If you ask me why, I suggest you start reading, and then ask me again.
 

Filiecs

New member
May 24, 2011
359
0
0
ScreamingNinja said:
I'm starting to agree with some of the other guise on here. 'Hey, it's okay to fuck your sister, woop-woo! It don't hurt no body!'

Really? And if you like cutting yourself to the bone and bleeding out everywhere, it's okay, because it don't hurt no body! Because you're into it, so that makes it okay.

So that guy loves to have sex with that dog over there! It's alright, the Dog seems to be enjoying it, none of my buisness!

You can't just sit off to the side and let sick shit happen, people. Seriously. Everyone needs some form of morality and rules to live by, where you find them is your buisness. But if you can't tell something that's inherently wrong, then I feel sorry for you.
We DO need to have a sense of morality, it is what drives us forward and what makes us human and our morality and free will are what give us our natural rights in the first place. However, It makes me sad whenever I see people basing what is "right" and what is "wrong" off of their morals (what is good and bad) rather than basing what is good and bad off of our natural rights. If leaders always put what they though was good and bad before what they knew was right then we would live like animals in a survival of the fittest society.

Edit:
ScreamingNinja said:
Filiecs said:
ScreamingNinja said:
Filiecs said:
Stop trying to make it seem like I support the violation of human rights and the torture of animals, because that is not the case.
Sorry brah, but if you're fine with people wacking off to kids, then you've still got some issues.
Under what basis do you hold these claims? I base mine off of our rights to life, liberty, and property, the very things allowing us to voice our opinions without being killled right now.
'Perfectly fine to me, then again I'm also okay with certain forms of beastiality, pedophelia (as long as they stick to masterbation)'

LOLSNAP! That's what I'm basing it off. Get help dude.
I'm sorry, but you are using the "it's wrong because it's wrong" argument. You can continue to think like that if you want but I'd never support you if you ever got a position of power.

Also, beastiality is one thing not defined by natural rights and that is an example of something that is 100% up to debate.
 

Dunkhelzahn

New member
Sep 22, 2009
29
0
0
I'm honestly surprised that nobody seems to have commented about the Westermark effect, yet.

Personally, I'll have to say that I agree with most people on here: If they both consent, then it's fine. Seeing all of the knee-jerk reactions on here is a little disturbing, to be honest.

Samurai Silhouette said:
Wow, it seems like people are willing to fuck anything these days. What's next? Pets? "Ohh, but the puppy loves its owner, and s/he's willing, I don't see anything wrong with that! You're too closed minded!"

You've got to be socially retarded if all you're able to shag are siblings. They will most likely have kids because "they love each other enough". We let this go on, soon we'll be researching ways to cater to the created abominations. Then we'll see a population explosive of mental retards from related parents that don't know how to stick their head out from under the rock they live in. I don't look forward to speaking herp derp in the future.
FalloutJack said:
With the House of Usher in mind, I have strong disagreements with incest. If you ask me why, I suggest you start reading, and then ask me again.
iblis666 said:
couldnt care less as long as no children are produced from the act

on the other hand if they do produce children than i believe that they and the child need to be castrated
Honestly, genetic purity is becoming less and less of an issue these days, and seeing some of the other forum posters react with disgust and hate to this topic bears some chilling resemblances to anti-black and anti-gay movements. Not exactly the same, sure, but when you start thinking that children need to be killed to maintain genetic 'purity' (even jokingly) then you should really take a step back and try to rethink your position.
 

higgs20

New member
Feb 16, 2010
409
0
0
i don't understand why someone would want to have sex with a member of their family, the idea just seems weird to me. but on the other hand their doing so has absolutely no effect on me so go for it i guess.
 

ScreamingNinja

New member
Apr 12, 2011
102
0
0
Filiecs said:
ScreamingNinja said:
I'm starting to agree with some of the other guise on here. 'Hey, it's okay to fuck your sister, woop-woo! It don't hurt no body!'

Really? And if you like cutting yourself to the bone and bleeding out everywhere, it's okay, because it don't hurt no body! Because you're into it, so that makes it okay.

So that guy loves to have sex with that dog over there! It's alright, the Dog seems to be enjoying it, none of my buisness!

You can't just sit off to the side and let sick shit happen, people. Seriously. Everyone needs some form of morality and rules to live by, where you find them is your buisness. But if you can't tell something that's inherently wrong, then I feel sorry for you.
We DO need to have a sense of morality, it is what drives us forward and what makes us human and our morality and free will are what give us our natural rights in the first place. However, It makes me sad whenever I see people basing what is "right" and what is "wrong" off of their morals (what is good and bad) rather than basing what is good and bad off of our natural rights. If leaders always put what they though was good and bad before what they knew was right then we would live like animals in a survival of the fittest society.
Good point, but how do you decide what is 'right and wrong' without using your own morals as a compass? Everyone has rights.. To a point. Somethings are just wrong, and that's it. I'm not talking about religion here, I only believe in the Golden Throne(Because hey, why not, right? ) But since we've had people point out that you won't have retarded children, that doesn't make this any less wrong.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Dunkhelzahn said:
-Oh, a Shadowrun fan-
I don't know what you're talking about. I was referring to the madness, the murder, and the physical inconvenience.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
I'm quite disgusted by it but with the consent of two adults, it's not morally wrong.
 

redeemer09

New member
Jan 19, 2009
202
0
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lffwR5-U0YE what is this?fuck everything with a hole day?were the christians right? do i have force my self to give them a cookie for being right?