This is terrible logic. Firstly loads and loads of people lose their jobs in a crash so hoping for one is bad.
Secondly there would be an entertainment black hole for years whilst we waiting for companies to slowly grow to fill the void.
Thirdly, when there's no money in games less people will try to become game developers, game developers will leave the industry because there are no jobs here and stable teams that have learned to work efficiently with each other will break up. So quality of games and our ability to produce quality games will go down
But most importantly, if a company is more competent, then that would be defined by their ability to outcompete the less competent people. So you wouldn't need a crash because they'd be making like Valve or CD Projekt and scoring huge profits, growing rapidly and building up a solid fanbase. If you can't do well as a company until EA dies, then it probably means that things aren't going to better under them than EA
Secondly there would be an entertainment black hole for years whilst we waiting for companies to slowly grow to fill the void.
Thirdly, when there's no money in games less people will try to become game developers, game developers will leave the industry because there are no jobs here and stable teams that have learned to work efficiently with each other will break up. So quality of games and our ability to produce quality games will go down
But most importantly, if a company is more competent, then that would be defined by their ability to outcompete the less competent people. So you wouldn't need a crash because they'd be making like Valve or CD Projekt and scoring huge profits, growing rapidly and building up a solid fanbase. If you can't do well as a company until EA dies, then it probably means that things aren't going to better under them than EA