Progress in terms of social critique. He is shot by a white man working for the state (or who is at least state senctioned). George Romero denies any attempt at social critique, but released in 1968 Night of the Living Dead does at least coincide with the civil rights movement (alongside a number of other social movements).Aetera said:In the original Night of the Living Dead, the black guy is the main protagonist, and outlives everyone else in the movie. He is shot at the very end, but since EVERYONE else dies, I guess this is progress? If nothing else, it was a huge landmark for going against stereotypes in film.
Everybody dies in that movie, including the Black guy.y04coopa said:Final Destination 3
Violent?! They just CGI'ed him to death! Hardly the most violent death out there.knight of some random number said:
Um, you are aware that Ben was one of the earliest black protagonists in the history of American film, right? That's DEFINITELY not progress... nope nope. Not progress without a doubt. One of the earliest films to feature an African American lead is ANTI-progressive! I hope this sarcasm is heavy-handed enough.tigermilk said:Progress in terms of social critique. He is shot by a white man working for the state (or who is at least state senctioned). George Romero denies any attempt at social critique, but released in 1968 Night of the Living Dead does at least coincide with the civil rights movement (alongside a number of other social movements).
hold it!thefreeman0001 said:in the alternative ending of dawn of the dead from the the 1970's (the first one where they go to the mall) the black man doesnt commit suicide he fights against the zombies and makes a break for the escape chopper
I did't suggest a black character in itself was progressive. It could be cited as such but perhaps not a year after two Sydney Poitier performances were nominated for best film Oscars both films presenting a black man as a hero acting in opposition to a white racist substructure. In the Heat of the Night with Poitier depicting a black police officer coming against racist bigotry won best film.Stall said:John in Day of the Dead doesn't die. Peter from Dawn doesn't die as well. Come to think of it, Ben was the last to die in Night. That kind of counts, right? Though, none of Romero's characters are token, so I don't know if they count.
Yes, I did just spoil the endings of films that are 26, 33, and 43, years old, respectively.
Violent?! They just CGI'ed him to death! Hardly the most violent death out there.knight of some random number said:
Um, you are aware that Ben was one of the earliest black protagonists in the history of American film, right? That's DEFINITELY not progress... nope nope. Not progress without a doubt. One of the earliest films to feature an African American lead is ANTI-progressive! I hope this sarcasm is heavy-handed enough.tigermilk said:Progress in terms of social critique. He is shot by a white man working for the state (or who is at least state senctioned). George Romero denies any attempt at social critique, but released in 1968 Night of the Living Dead does at least coincide with the civil rights movement (alongside a number of other social movements).
Honestly, have you even watched Night of the Living Dead? Ben's actions towards the end of the film really push the audience away from his side. It's not like he was an overall likable character through the entire movie, you know. He really started to become a dick towards the end of the film, thus is why I fail to see how ANYONE could read anything political or social into his death.