Not really. If a thread has a lot of posts then I'll add my two cents anyway if the topic interests me and I know enough to be able to find two cents in my pocket about the discussion. If there are a lot of pages then the simple answer is to just not bother reading them and add a post with no responses (or simply read through the last page on the thread for any discussions that are happening/ could happen).
For me it's less whether or not it has a lot of pages and more just whether or not I can write enough on the topic. A post on something you know nothing about is a useless post, with the result that I often delete a lot of posts which I start writing as I just can't think of enough to write in them. I care a little about whether or not people respond; getting a quoted message in my inbox is definately very nice but I'm not too fussed if what I write meets blind eyes. You may question my incentive for writing then; I think it's just the potential for discussion which pushes me, even though it doesn't really annoy me if people don't read what I write.
Also after I post I will keep an eye on the thread for any more discussion in that thread I could add to.
Pimppeter2 said:
I jump into any discussion I have something to say.
[...]
...I always have something important to say.
If you always have something important to say and jump into any discussion in which you have something important to say, does that mean you jump into every discussion?
PurpleSky said:
You're right,I sugest somebody implements a posting rating system,you know,the most relevant posts get read first or something,that or the funny ones,whatever is good for me
That still relies on people reading through the whole thread, though. If people aren't reading the whole threads (which is what's putting people in this thread off posting), how can they find something relevant to rate positive/ irrelevant to rate negative?