yes thier are some fantastic single player games(such as the ones you listed) that no body whos mentally mature enough should miss out on. But the same can not be said of the online aspect of other games(Halo 3, MW, WaW,& MW2), I don't care how mature some kids are they should be barred from playing online until they've turned 17(or whatever the mature age is depending on your location)gamefreakbsp said:Yes. There are some games that are just fantastic that are M rated. Fallout 3 and Assassin's Creeds 1 and 2 are all rated M and they are some of the best games ever. If someone is prepared for the game experience, then why should they have to refrain from playing just because their parents cannot handle it?
Yes I've thought of this, they probly think we're dumb tossers but odds are we're having more fun than them so who caresgeldonyetich said:I think younger games who aren't allowed to play Rated M games are probably heavily involved in a 1001 free 2 play online games and wondering WTF is with these old gamers and their dumb tendency to pay $50 a game, let alone $15/mo.
EDIT:slopeslider said:With that spelling it's 'E-Z 2 C Y U R KNOT Machure E-NUF 2 PLay Them'.
Also immature kids ruin team based games on consoles, as they are mostly p2p and I randmly get matched up with kids who, to put it kindly, are loud, prone to complaining and suck. Just because I can mute their whiny voices doesn't help when I get rammed by the kid in front of me driving in reverse at the start of a race FOR FUN. Makes me want to get a pc and join a moderated server for big boys only....
Granted there are adult who act this way but I'd say they're slightly less prone to it.
Hehe I'mplayingDominating Blazblue and my 13 year old cousin asks "Aren't you a little old to play a cartoon game? Don't you pay mature games like cod4?"
[HEADING=1]IRONY[/HEADING]
AjimboB said:It would be really nice if more parents actually did that. More mature games would actually be MATURE, and I won't have whiny 12 year old cursing me out every game that I play online.
Seriously, it would be heaven, gaming bliss, not to have these children online.
Who cares if they miss out? They'll be able to get the games eventually, once they get older, and will therefore no longer be missing out.
Seriously, there should be an age limit for gaming. You have to be 16 to drive a car, and yes, if you are under 16, you are missing out, but who the fuck cares, it makes it safer for everyone else. Same thing should happen with games, having a 16 or 17 year old age limit to play mature games, and it should somehow be monitored.
THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!
I agree that the ESRB rating system works well and it is certainly better than anything I could come up with but it does not control which games come out and is not a government run program. I had said nothing about the ESRB my post was merely anti censorship in terms of the government being able to decide which games one can and can't play by banning games of a certain rating. I applaud you for having the respect to disagree with my without starting a stupid flame war and actually saying something intelligent.PessimistOwl said:I disagree. Think about it, if it weren't for the ESRB then someone else would be in control of said rating systems. In this case, let's just say it was the government. If this were the case, it may come to the point where the only games that do come out, would be things like tetris and pinball and the like. Games that exist today (ie: Fallout, GOW, MW2, ME2, ect.) are only really able to come out because of these fellows and their scrutinizing nature. I would like to think that "the devil you know is better than the devil you don't".Malf said:I would say that these kid's are missing out I wrote an entire Thesis paper on exactly why every case is different and why there should not be government regulation on video games. Every child is different and so parents who decide that because a game is M rated that their kid/kids can't play it are just lazy and know nothing about their kids.
If it helps any, tell her Assassin's Creed is a Canadian game, therfore peaceful by default.rileyrulesu said:for whatever reason my mom wont let me buy anything with a violent sounding title. i'm 17 in a month so it's not really a big deal. but she wont let me buy left for dead 2 assasins creed to or anything like that, it doesn't matter how bad the game is she can forget about that, but as long as she didn't let her son buy super killer zombie shooter 3
Yes, your life would be eternal suffering on par with living in a warzone, or a plague or the holocaust if you could not play M-Rated games.SUPA FRANKY said:There are games that have very little to no gore at all. Also, there owuld be several experiences in video games that would falter greatly if their "mature" content was removed, so yeah: It would be hell.Del-Toro said:No it wouldn't, there is plenty to life outside of M rated videogames, there's plenty to videogames outside of the M-rating. I get that it's probably hyperboly but if you need lots of blood and violence to enjoy something then the problem isn't the parents it's you.SUPA FRANKY said:that life would be fucking hell