Only if I'm a die hard fanboy, such as in the case of warhammer games, or if I'm super into the genre, like say an Xcom like.
I got no problem paying full price for a product that I know I will super enjoy , 60$ might seem expensive... But if you end up playing the game a lot and loving it, you end up getting a good ratio of fun for each dollar spent.
Since I rarely go to the cinema or indulge myself in other things people typically spend on, I see that as a fair trade off.
Finally there's the bigger picture to consider..
Johnny Novgorod said:
I prefer waiting. Time weeds out the bad games while the good games get cheaper and/or packed in collections.
I can't agree with this statement, plenty of games I've loved to bits have died or failed because they were niche and thus had a small market to begin with or other factors such as poor marketing.
And it's not just "good" games that end up getting cheaper or put into collections, I cannot think of ANY game that doesn't go down in price given enough time nor is being in a collection the sign of quality, there are plenty of shovelware collections out there.
I fully believe in voting with my wallet and showing there's a clear interest in stuff I like, by the time a game hits the bargain bit it's too late to send that signal. Look at Beyond Good and Evil, which most seem to think was amazing.. That game died hard because no one bought it, and no sudden outpouring of love years later once you could find that game on the cheap would suddenly convince its publishers it's viable. Maybe one day there will be a Beyond G & E 2, but until then, the series is dead because it didn't sell during its initial run.