I agree with you, but the broad spectrum of the genres tend to be a load of well, drivvel. If any musical medium is used tastefully it can be a true expression of emotion. Personally, I have an ear for music, yet I don't posses the musical talent for an instrument, so if I used a computer to recompose a classic or something to that effect, that would be a tasteful use of the medium, or create my own composition. However if I wanted to make a quick million I could sell out all my morals and principals and throw together a quick bass beat various forms of noise so nothing really makes sense, a catchy "chorus" and speak simple, tribal, words like "sex sex sex sex" into it. you know, no effort required, completely souless.zephae said:I see this dichotomy in a lot of people and I really don't understand it. How can you say that The Sugar Hill Gang is soulless? And if you make that exception, then you start opening up the door to ever more exceptions in those categories. I also have to ask if "pop-hiphop-r&b-rap etc." would include funk?Phenakist said:Metal-rock-classical etc. real musicNeutralMunchHotel said:Out of interest, what do you consider real music and what do you consider soulless noise?Phenakist said:So, us preferring real music over computer generated soulless noise is a bad thing?
What is this I don't even.
Pop-hiphop-r&b-rap etc. soulless.
It's the same with House and electronica. Sure, there's a lot of crap to be had and I usually am not a fan of popular music, but you'd be hard-pressed to say something like this is soulless: (to me, that's practically classical re-imagined in electronic form)
IMO, an instrument is an instrument whether it's a guitar, your vocal chords, or a computer. What matters is if you can put those sounds together in an emotionally compelling way.
The point I was trying to make was that rap is mostly about "guns hoes drugs and lowriders" or some vague combination of them all, pop is all sex appeal and catchy beats.... there isnt' any soul in the vast majority of modern music.