Stall said:
Bach is one of the most brilliant, if not the single most brilliant, music mind who has ever existed. I enjoy mostly his secular works, but many of his masses and cantatas are equally as beautiful.
Huzzah, another Bach lover. It's rather strange that his secular music was so well written, seeing as how devout a Lutheran he was. Still, immense output at that (sure, nothing on Handel, but immense enough, seeing as how he lived most of his adult life tremendously short sighted and the final ten-ish years almost blind)...
AlAaraaf74 said:
SckizoBoy said:
And the thing is, I actually prefer harpsichord music to piano music, largely because I was part of several baroque ensembles when I was younger (violinist/viola/harpsichord). You wouldn't believe how difficult it is to find a good harpsichord to play these days... they go out of tune within a month and I was lucky I got to play one at school. *sigh*
I like both piano and harpsichord, but I get annoyed when pieces for those instruments are interchanged. For example, I had listened to Bach's Harpsichord Concerto in D minor only with a piano instead. It didn't sound right at all.
I'm a purist too, albeit a slightly more relaxed one, as I've listened to recordings of that Concerto in D-minor with a piano and they were quite good (though admittedly, not a patch on the harpsichord original). I do prefer the 'historically informed' in the end, though. And no disrespect to him, but I cannot stand Glenn Gould's recordings...
Here's a question: have you heard Maxim Vengerov's interpretation of the Fugue (from the Toccata and Fugue in D-minor for the Organ) on the violin? It might not sound like much, but the chords/arpeggios he gets out of the instrument left me speechless. Andrew Manze version (listen from 2:07, Toccata is
very hard to transcribe and not as good as the Vengerov transcription)
Oh, and Leopold Stokowski's transcriptions of Bach's Passacaglia and Fugue in C-minor for a full orchestra is worth a listen too.