Does it piss you off when people text at a movie theater?

Recommended Videos

Nikolaz72

This place still alive?
Apr 23, 2009
2,125
0
0
SonOfVoorhees said:
KeyMaster45 said:
Makes me want to invest in a cell phone jammer regardless if it's illegal in the US.
Im all for that. A cinema is private property and we are all customers paying to watch a movie that has banned cell phones. So im all for jammers. Wonder if they make them small enough to jam just the people watching the movie, and if they want to make a call they can just leave the cinema.
Where I live they 'have' Jammers in the large cinemas xD.
 

Rblade

New member
Mar 1, 2010
497
0
0
if you cannot go 90 minutes without sending a text message, there is either something so important going on you have no business being in a theater or your just retarded.

I, for the life of me, can't understand why you would pay 10 euro's for a ticket and 5 euro's for a soda if you have no intention of paying attention to the damn movie. Unless it's on a date in which case you won't be texting either.
 

Gerishnakov

New member
Jun 15, 2010
273
0
0
It annoys me if I can see it, obviously. I just don't understand why you'd go to a cinema and purposely leave your phone in a mode that can alert you to incoming calls or texts. When I go to the cinema I put my phone on silent and turn off the vibrate; more often than not I put it in a bag I have with me. I paid my £8, I don't want to be disturbed at all.
 

Sanat

New member
Apr 7, 2012
149
0
0
I don't see how it could possibly annoy you in a movie, unless they text with a message tone, then the noise would be annoying. But it's common sense to have your phone on silent... always, IMO, and just take the time to hold that vibrate button or change the setting before you go into the cinema at least.

But texting in general? How is that annoying in any way? They're communicating with others that they're not with at that point in time. People talk to eachother. It's what they do. It's not like everyone you are with is required to give you 100% of their attention all the time.
In a movie someone texting is nigh on unnoticeable, and if it is noticeable, it's easily ignorable. The light is minor, and there is NO sound. People breathing is almost more irritating. And let's not even talk about eating popcorn or drinking through a straw. Heaven forbid!

If you can't ignore someone texting in a movie theatre with a movie playing, there's something wrong.

And if people texting in general annoys you, then by god, look away! Or bare them the what... 20 seconds it takes them to send the text? If you're talking to them, then don't tell them anything vital for the fraction of a minute of the time you're with them, and continue on after they've finished. And if you can't do any of that then... Well, honestly:

Deal with it.
 

MasochisticAvenger

New member
Nov 7, 2011
331
0
0
DigitalAtlas said:
No, and complaining about it just means you aren't thinking and might be getting a tad caught up in your own experience. What if someone went to see a movie who suddenly had to help a friend in need via txt? Should they just ignore them so you don't have to deal with an occasional flicker?
Alright, if someone contacts you who is in so much trouble they cannot wait a couple of hours for the movie to finish, get the fuck out of the theater and call them because obviously texting them is going to take too long. Whatever emergency it is, is probably going to force you to leave the cinema anyway.

DigitalAtlas said:
What if they were uninterested in the movie but didn't want to leave due to friends, ride wasn't there yet, or just simply didn't want to waste the money by leaving?
Tough shit. People shouldn't try and ruin my experience just because they aren't enjoying the movie. Also, most cinemas I've been to give you a full refund within the first 30 minutes of the movie. If you haven't decided if you're interested by that point, you're pretty slow.

DigitalAtlas said:
You want a better experience? Politely ask the person to stop txting, or get satisfied we even have the luxury at all. I don't see how a little back light bothers you anyway.
Really?! We're fortunate to have movies so that means you can be rude and inconsiderate? We're fortunate to have food, so I guess you won't mind if someone spits in your next time.
 

MasochisticAvenger

New member
Nov 7, 2011
331
0
0
Sanat said:
If you can't ignore someone texting in a movie theatre with a movie playing, there's something wrong.
If you can't go ninety minutes to two hours without sending a text message, you have a problem. Seek help, because you are clearly addicted.
 

FamoFunk

Dad, I'm in space.
Mar 10, 2010
2,628
0
0
I'd rather someone text than answer a call.

I really don't get how someone cannot leave their phone alone for ~2 hours though, that boggles me.
 

Kungfu_Teddybear

Member
Legacy
Jan 17, 2010
2,714
0
1
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Doesn't really bother me unless they are right next to me. Otherwise I'm too busy watching the movie to even notice.
 

Sanat

New member
Apr 7, 2012
149
0
0
MasochisticAvenger said:
Sanat said:
If you can't ignore someone texting in a movie theatre with a movie playing, there's something wrong.
If you can't go ninety minutes to two hours without sending a text message, you have a problem. Seek help, because you are clearly addicted.
- Phone vibrates once; "Oh, I have a message!"
- Check phone and contents of text during an unimportant scene in movie (I'm talking 5-10 seconds here)
- If applicable, reply to text in a similar point in the movie, or even while you're watching (Touch texting is a simple skill)

Tell me that takes more effort than is deemably overseeable and I'll give you a cookie. I miss none of the movie, I've made no noise, and I've continued [x] conversation and/or informed [y] person.

It's called multitasking. As with my last post, 100% attention is not a law. Nor is it even possible. And in an hour to three hour screening, I'm sure one can find the thirty seconds it takes to multitask and text. If you can't/don't care to, don't.
I don't feel obliged to do it, I just know that I can with an infintesimal amount of effort. So I do.

And for god's sake, if someone's annoying you during a movie, tell them. They'll doubtless stop or attempt to avoid repeating it. And if they do repeat it, and it's in reason to be punished (I.E. not texting, call up an usher to warn them/kick them out.
Don't just sit there and fume about it then go home to moan on The Escapist forums about something that you could have easily prevented or caused to cease.
 

The Night Angel

New member
Dec 30, 2011
2,417
0
0
Yes, I think it is extremely disrespectful, the clicking and tapping is bad enough, then the really loud vibration on 'silent mode', and then there's the light. There is nothing more annoying in a dark movie theatre than having a bright light going off every few minutes in the corner of your eye. It is distracting, and takes away from the experience. Also, the people who text usually start whispering to the people beside them about what the person on the other end said. /rant
 

GundamSentinel

The leading man, who else?
Aug 23, 2009
4,448
0
0
It basically pisses me off when people do anything other than watching the movie in the movie theater, so yes.
 

Aardvark Soup

New member
Jul 22, 2008
1,058
0
0
I honestly don't really care what people do in theaters, as long as they don't make any noise or obstruct my view of the screen. People texting, usually, don't do this; so I don't have a problem with it.
 

MasochisticAvenger

New member
Nov 7, 2011
331
0
0
Sanat said:
MasochisticAvenger said:
Sanat said:
If you can't ignore someone texting in a movie theatre with a movie playing, there's something wrong.
If you can't go ninety minutes to two hours without sending a text message, you have a problem. Seek help, because you are clearly addicted.
- Phone vibrates once; "Oh, I have a message!"
- Check phone and contents of text during an unimportant scene in movie (I'm talking 5-10 seconds here)
- If applicable, reply to text in a similar point in the movie, or even while you're watching (Touch texting is a simple skill)

Tell me that takes more effort than is deemably overseeable and I'll give you a cookie. I miss none of the movie, I've made no noise, and I've continued [x] conversation and/or informed [y] person.

It's called multitasking. As with my last post, 100% attention is not a law. Nor is it even possible. And in an hour to three hour screening, I'm sure one can find the thirty seconds it takes to multitask and text. If you can't/don't care to, don't.
I don't feel obliged to do it, I just know that I can with an infintesimal amount of effort. So I do.

And for god's sake, if someone's annoying you during a movie, tell them. They'll doubtless stop or attempt to avoid repeating it. And if they do repeat it, and it's in reason to be punished (I.E. not texting, call up an usher to warn them/kick them out.
Don't just sit there and fume about it then go home to moan on The Escapist forums about something that you could have easily prevented or caused to cease.
Oh I can agree to that. It's easy enough to go to someone "Hey could you please stop X. I'm trying to watch the movie", but it would be nice if people didn't play with their phones in the first place. It's just a little common courtesy.
 

starslasher

New member
May 21, 2011
67
0
0
texting can be annoying, yes. but as other pointed out, talking during the movie is much worse and more disrupting.
 

Sanat

New member
Apr 7, 2012
149
0
0
MasochisticAvenger said:
[snip] but it would be nice if people didn't play with their phones in the first place. It's just a little common courtesy.
Admittedly someone getting out their phone blatantly, maybe commenting or laughing about whatever they've recieved, and then waving the phone around (relatively speaking) while they reply and basically being obnoxious about it can definitely be irritating.

But it's so simple to do it discreetly, and many people do. That really shoudn't be annoying, and if it is, maybe some form of inherent dislike or prejudice is coming in to play. Judging by the attitudes of a few people in this thread, that seems apparent.