Dog-Fighting Game Pulled from Android Market

Recommended Videos

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
Just going by the concept without any knowledge of the actual gameplay... boo freaking hoo. Complaining about this is just plain silly. It's not like I don't spend my evenings murdering fake humans in my FPS games. It's not like millions of young kids aren't capturing, training, and fighting fake animals in their Pokemon games. It's not like millions of people don't slaughter billions of fake critters in MMOs...

Sure, in real life it's a terrible terrible act... but so is murder of humans. Morals don't really transfer over to video games so well.
 

Owlslayer

New member
Nov 26, 2009
1,954
0
0
HankMan said:
All Thing Digitals was barking up the wrong tree.
Aaah, the puns. So many...

Seriously, is it just me or are you the pun-master of the Escapist (in a good way, of course)?
Almost every news post i go to, you're there, making quite nifty puns.
And that's pretty awesome. You've got quite the mind to be able to think so many of them.


OT: Not the best idea for a game, IMO. Wouldn't play it myself.
 

thenumberthirteen

Unlucky for some
Dec 19, 2007
4,794
0
0
This is awful. I mean The Escapist wouldn't be caught dead making a game about dogs violently killing eachother! <URL=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/content/games/gamedogs/satansretrievers.php>*cough*

I don't approve of this game and I fully support Android's descision to remove it. It's their prerogative.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
"A game where players raise dogs to fight other dogs in illegal dog-fighting rings has been given the boot from Android Market after people (appropriately) complained.

When it comes to the issue of dog-fighting (and not the cool kind with fighter planes over WW2-era Britain) I find myself solidly in the same camp as MovieBob: It's a heinous act and those who engage in it should be punished with the full force of the law."


What? You're bloody Americans! I'm supposed to be telling you how free speech works best when its not totally free.

Anyway, despite that, you are wrong in this case. I accidentally (well, 'accidentally') shot a hostage in ARMA 2 today, in Mafia 2 yesterday I shot a security guard for some fuel stamps, in EVE the other month I helped steal another player's property, in GTA I shot a granny for the lulz, in Hitman: Blood Money I assassinated several people who, bad as they may be, should have been arrested and put on trial.

"Naturally, there are always going to be some amoral jerks who look at the practice of forcing dogs to brutally murder each other and say, "Hey, that would make a cool game.""

MOST GAMES ARE A VERY MINOR VARIATION ON THIS.

If it was two people being forced into fighting to the death in a crappy little flash game you wouldn't blink an eyelid.

"Such was the case with Dog Wars, a mobile game on Android where players raised their dogs to fight other dogs."

But if you call it "Pokemon" and give the animals some silly names, its all swell? My mind has just exploded from the hypocrisy in this, which is not good for my revising.
 

Kanane Jones

New member
Apr 2, 2010
1
0
0
It's not like you can't still install the game on your phone as long as it's available somewhere on the 'net (this isn't the iPhone people).
 

Dana22

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,274
0
0
SaneAmongInsane said:
tanis1lionheart said:
So Pokemon is okay but this isn't?

o_O


I am confused.
My thought exactly. How the fuck is this any different from Pokemon?
Its not. But Nintendo can afford to not give a flying shit about what Humane Society things. I guess !
 

For.I.Am.Mad

New member
May 8, 2010
664
0
0
Looks like the powers-that-be still have Vick on a chain. 'Yeah, I'm totally, umm against this, I guess, I don't know.'
 

DazBurger

New member
May 22, 2009
1,339
0
0
FutureJarhead16 said:
Agent Larkin said:
No.

Just no.

Yeah free speech is great but that game...

No.
Yea free speech should only be allowed if its nice and we like it!
Well.. The Android market is run by a company, which are fully entitled to remove anything from THEIR marked-place that they find offensive.


So yeah! Free speech is great!.. But expect to be ignored If you piss of too many people.
 

Jumwa

New member
Jun 21, 2010
641
0
0
Dana22 said:
Killing people - All right ! Killing Dogs - No way.
Yeah, get back to making games about humans brutally murdering each other like a HEALTHY NORMAL PERSON.

After reading this post and the comments following I feel like I'm in an insane asylum. Where are peoples priorities?
 

Suskie

New member
Nov 9, 2009
210
0
0
I'm willing to bet that you could release a cockfighting game on the app market and no one would care. And that's not even counting the fact that a large portion of today's gaming industry revolves around people killing people. There's just something about dogs. I mean, I think the idea is in poor taste (especially since whoever made it was probably well aware that it would piss people off), BUT I think it should be allowed, because I believe in freedom of speech. Pulling this particular game simply for being distasteful seems dictatorial, unless the AppMarket has documented standards that this game failed to follow.

By the way, thanks to everyone in this thread for not throwing fuel into the let's-hate-Michael-Vick fire. As an Eagles fan, you can imagine I'm a little sick of hearing about that.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
I'm going to believe that Vick is legitimate in his speaking out against this.

Anyway, yeah, i dont know. My first dog was a dog fighting dog. Looking back, I'm rather amazed he was never put down. He was a bruiser of a dog. I dont know, I cant really say if dog fighting is wrong <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.279950-Poll-Is-it-morally-wrong-to-eat-cats-and-dogs?page=2#10934781>when you can have animal cruelty as art.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
AC10 said:
This game should be put back on the market.
In Pokemon I can fight all animals I want. In Manhunt you can stalk and violently murder people to death with primitive weapons like palstic bags and shards of glass.

Why does this Dog game matter? You can't use any argument against it you couldn't against any other game. It allows you to simulate doing illegal things? Cruel things? Immoral things? Need I list you the amount of games that allow this?

In New Vegas I could fight Rad Scorpions in a ring; why is this game any different?
Oh you know, dogs are special, you can't hurt them in a game without people makign a load of fuss;


Oh wait. Nope, it's mostly hypocrisy.

The point is people are ultimately indifferent to the appalling murder rates in the United States, after all it's mostly "gang members" (code word for guess what) killing each other. And they don't like "gang members", they can kill each other all they like. But they LIKE dogs, and while they are complacent over the slaughter of people the idea of dogs being hurt is such a shock to them they get all idealistic, that NO DEPICTION of it can be accepted.

So in the unique circumstances of a game where a dog hurts another dog they are reminded of that blood sport those "gang members" practice and get all indignant and start making exceptions to freedom-of-speech that ultimately undermine liberty for ALL games.

I put this in the same category as N'Gai Croal's rant about black zombies in Resident Evil 5, but at least he saw sense in the end.
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
Violence toward animals has always been a grey area for me. In one sense, I enjoy killing the shit out of humans in a video game but detest having to do it to animals. I'm not sure what distinction between the hampers me, other than finding animals adorable!
 

pokepuke

New member
Dec 28, 2010
139
0
0
This makes no sense, especially the part about Michael Vick endorsing its removal. Even before I saw his name in the article, I was gonna say that maybe if he had this game then he might have avoided trying to do it in real life! Now how will people play out their desires to breed, train, and pit dogs against each other? They have no outlet!
 

beema

New member
Aug 19, 2009
944
0
0
Good riddance. Pretty funny that Vick is now all suddenly pro-animal rights. I love when people realize something is immoral only after going to jail for it. Oh well, even if he's full of it, better that he helps out animal rights than does nothing.

This still doesn't address the issue of there being no goddamn halfway-decent games for Android besides Angry Birds!!! Come on developers! I want something besides Bejeweled knock-offs and generic top-down shooters!