"A game where players raise dogs to fight other dogs in illegal dog-fighting rings has been given the boot from Android Market after people (appropriately) complained.
When it comes to the issue of dog-fighting (and not the cool kind with fighter planes over WW2-era Britain) I find myself solidly in the same camp as MovieBob: It's a heinous act and those who engage in it should be punished with the full force of the law."
What? You're bloody Americans! I'm supposed to be telling you how free speech works best when its not totally free.
Anyway, despite that, you are wrong in this case. I accidentally (well, 'accidentally') shot a hostage in ARMA 2 today, in Mafia 2 yesterday I shot a security guard for some fuel stamps, in EVE the other month I helped steal another player's property, in GTA I shot a granny for the lulz, in Hitman: Blood Money I assassinated several people who, bad as they may be, should have been arrested and put on trial.
"Naturally, there are always going to be some amoral jerks who look at the practice of forcing dogs to brutally murder each other and say, "Hey, that would make a cool game.""
MOST GAMES ARE A VERY MINOR VARIATION ON THIS.
If it was two people being forced into fighting to the death in a crappy little flash game you wouldn't blink an eyelid.
"Such was the case with Dog Wars, a mobile game on Android where players raised their dogs to fight other dogs."
But if you call it "Pokemon" and give the animals some silly names, its all swell? My mind has just exploded from the hypocrisy in this, which is not good for my revising.