"Outlaw guns, and only the outlaws will have guns"EllEzDee said:Exactly how it works in England and most of Europe. Police carry batons, pepper spray and non leathal weapons. If a truly dangerous human being is noted, which is highly unlikely what with the gun laws in place, then an armed contingent will arrive to take him down. Much better than giving Tom Dick and Harry an armed pistol without any kind of crash course lesson on using it.danpascooch said:I'm sorry, are you saying the FREAKING POLICE should not be allowed to have guns?EllEzDee said:Once again, why are Americans allowed to carry guns?
How the hell would that work.
Police: "Dear psychotic heroin dealer who is firing at us with that Uzi, please put your hands on your head and remain still while we approach you with these handcuffs"
Psychotic Heroin Dealer: "No problem officer, I am 100% reasonable, and as we all know no criminal poses any sort of physical threat to a police officer, I'm happy that you have all chosen not to bring guns"
and they live happily ever after?
I get you want to yell at Americans and start a mini-flame war for some reason (probably an ignorant one) but saying police officers shouldn't have guns is absolute insanity.
There is a cultural difference in America and England, frankly, it's fucking awesome that police don't always need to carry firearms in England, but in America it simply would not work. No law is going to stop outlaws from getting their hands on a gun if they truly want it.
The reason police in England don't always need them is because guns are less popular among outlaws culturally. And the "armed contingent" alternative is definitely favorable to England with it's higher population density, in the United States most places couldn't afford to have normal police and armed contingents on standby, it would work in urban centers, but rurally the police would all have to be armed, which would raise the question of "how rural does an area need to be before a cop is allowed to carry a gun?"