The dog was a threat after it turned violent when roped, as noted before the stun gun would not have worked, its much better to put down a animal that risk serious injury to a cop
What he said. This video does not show the whole story nor explain what happened prior to it.Pirate Kitty said:Glad to see the forum is not jumping to conclusions here. /sarcasm
For all we know that dog was rabid and had killed a child in the neighborhood.
Actually I edited out because I felt I was being redundant. Doesn't seem like you caught that though.Pirate Kitty said:Awesome. So you'll be off hunting Big Foot and UFO's next, right?mindlesspuppet said:SNIP
By the way: Nice work on editing out the insult. Nice to see you can think clearly after you've opened your mouth/typed.
So you are saying someone took the time to alter that video there of some random dog and two police officers? Or the whole thing was staged? If it is the former, that is too much effort going into one trivial thing. And if it was the latter, than they would use a trained dog. Why would they shoot a trained dog? That kind of "sacrifice" is definitely not worth it.Pirate Kitty said:More videos on the internet? What stunning proof of the officer's inhumanity.
I saw a video of an alien the other day on the net. I guess aliens are real. Bug Foot, too.
True but I'm pretty sure the voltage on this things are adjustable, if the low setting numbs a person on a dog it would be a bit more severe but would unlikely cause death.Generic Gamer said:Sorry but that's a bad idea. You can't guarantee that the same voltage to drop a person won't either a. kill or b. do absolutely nothing to another species. In fact option a is more likely but option b is the more dangerous one. Tazers are not a wonder weapon, they're the last resort before shooting to kill. This is because they're potentially lethal.Kukakkau said:Also BIG note - the rotund officer is holding a STUN gun the whole time - a weapon designed to incap a human briefly that could have easily subdued a dog
Secondly, how is the dog being controlled? By a metal pole attached to it. A metal pole linking the officer and the dog. To reiterate there's a very real chance tazing the dog would have floored the officer and pissed the dog off.
Yeah! We all know that everything videotaped is false and the only way to know the truth is to be personally present in every single event across the globe.Pirate Kitty said:More videos on the internet? What stunning proof of the officer's inhumanity.arc1991 said:SNIP
I saw a video of an alien the other day on the net. I guess aliens are real. Bug Foot, too.
Reading this, I'm even more convinced that the police officers were most likely what they were supposed to. Police officers don't just pull out their guns whenever they feel like it. Before all you people yell "THE DOG WAS HELPLESS USE COMMON SENSE", use common sense yourself. It's ridiculous to jump to conclusions without knowing any details. As Blind Sight kindly showed, a dog being pet doesn't say anthing about its potential dangerousness.Blind Sight said:Let me tell you a story about my favourite bulldog in the world, Hugo, my old boss' pet. He was a great, happy dog, completely normal. Anyway, one day we're outside having a smoke, and he's leashed up, but sees a German Shepherd walking down the street. Instantly, he goes tearing after it, so hard that he actually broke the leash. He charged up and BIT THE OTHER DOG IN THE FACE. He wouldn't let go, we literally had to pull him off of it. We got him back into the building, and checked the damage. The shepherd had lost a good portion of its skin, as well as an ear. When I went inside to check on Hugo, he was completely happy, relaxed, and covered in the other dog's blood. I could approach him, and he seemed to have completely forgotten about what had happened. Anyway, we assumed that it was a territorial thing, and my boss took him home. That night, Hugo tried to attack his four-year-old son.
The fact is that you don't know what really happened. A video of a dog being pet does not prove it wasn't a threat.
Pirate Kitty said:Glad to see the forum is not jumping to conclusions here. /sarcasm
For all we know that dog was rabid and had killed a child in the neighborhood.
First, nice irony there Kitty, jumping to the conclusion that the cops were right and defending that attitude ferociouslyKenko said:What he said. This video does not show the whole story nor explain what happened prior to it.
Of course, take it with a pinch of salt for being a YouTube comment and all, but still it's a compelling scenario that seems to hold up to the visual evidence of the vids more than, say, your original postulation that it was a killer.I read all the cop forums, the new paper articles etc. The dog growled at some woman and her kid, chased someone in the past, yet never bit anyone. All kinds of dogs growl daily and it's not a bases to kill them. The owner may be a -total waste of life- but that dog deserved a chance. I'll happily tell anyone what I think of cops in person. They aren't anything like Andy Griffith in Mayberry like they should be, they're a beast with unlimited power that relies on fear and lies.
Why should we place so much faith in the police? WE ALL KNOW they can and occassionaly DO absue their power and authority over others becuase largely they can get away with it because... they're the police.Pirate Kitty said:Glad to see the forum is not jumping to conclusions here. /sarcasm
For all we know that dog was rabid and had killed a child in the neighborhood.