Don't do drugs

Recommended Videos

yaik7a

New member
Aug 9, 2009
669
0
0
KillerMidget said:
My own personal way to stop people from taking drugs is to stop explaining them in detail to stupid children who can't handle knowledge. Instead I show them a big list of drugs like this:

Drugs: Heroin, Meth, Ecstasy, Cannabis, the air of London, Moss Side, holy water, penicillin and fatty foods apparently.
Effects of taking them: You die.

Problem solved.
lol thats good sarcasm
 

Sandernista

New member
Feb 26, 2009
1,302
0
0
KillerMidget said:
My own personal way to stop people from taking drugs is to stop explaining them in detail to stupid children who can't handle knowledge. Instead I show them a big list of drugs like this:

Drugs: Heroin, Meth, Ecstasy, Cannabis, the air of London, Moss Side, holy water, penicillin and fatty foods apparently.
Effects of taking them: You die.

Problem solved.
I did not know that cannabis, if not smoked has any detrimental effects, can you name them?

Personally, I stay away from stuff that you can OD on.
 

King of the N00bs

New member
Aug 12, 2009
425
0
0
that wasnt all that scary...i mean id be scared if somebody was in my shower, particularly myself with my skin rotting... but it didnt affect me all that much...of course im the "what the fuck is going on?" party so i guess you could say i care but dont care
 

pelopelopelo

New member
Sep 4, 2009
247
0
0
The best 'no to drugs!' avengers are the drinkers, the smokers, the coffee drinkers and those who just love a red bull.

Drugs are not bad. People can be responsible with them, know the risks and use them sensibly, or they can be stupid with them, let their usage of whatever drug is their vice take over their lives, and be dicks to support it.

Addiction isn't the evil it's made out to be. It's how you manage your addiction that is the problem. Not all heroin users are 'junkies'. Some people love food so much it is an active danger to their health.

:)
 

Kriptonite

New member
Jul 3, 2009
1,049
0
0
I don't think that Meth prevention adds are that effective. I say this because I (personally) don't think that there are throngs of people lining up to do Meth.

EDIT: Okay, video finally loaded. That was VERYweird. I have nothing else to say....
 

pelopelopelo

New member
Sep 4, 2009
247
0
0
I'm also fairly convinced that seeing a scabby, horrific version of yourself in the shower at the same time as you means you're already on meth.

:p
 

WolfMage

New member
May 19, 2008
611
0
0
First, is that ***** blind?
Why, no, how the fuck do you not notice Smeagol's sister sitting in your damn shower?!

And second, no, this didn't do shit, except make me wanna go smoke a joint.
And then drop acid, and then eat some shrooms, and then have a nice cup of absinthe and coffee, then go to bed.
Like every night.
 
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
Hafrael said:
I did not know that cannabis, if not smoked has any detrimental effects, can you name them?

Personally, I stay away from stuff that you can OD on.
According to the tip-toppy scientists of the universe it shall make you kill everyone in the vicinity or spawn numerous copies of yourself with different personalities (TV said so; it must be true).
 

Platos

New member
May 8, 2008
20
0
0
Go sit at your fucking cafe's drinking caffeine and discussing politics and culture you fucking junkies.

Don't sit there and preach to me. Don't think you're better than me because the drug you take is socially acceptable.

I'm sick of the discourse coming out of media and governments these days. Anybody with half a brain and with the will to research will know that alcohol is a horrible drug that is considerably worse than weed. I've never heard of ANYONE OD'ing off weed and if you do well then you totally suck dick and fail at life and you should be dead already.

I smoke about a 50 (3 sticks) a week, I go to uni and work part-time. My marks are good, I never take a sick day off work and I have a healthy relationship with my gf (aside from the times I've been caught). I'm a law abiding citizen, I don't kill, drive recklessly, nor fight. Yet you can sit at your fucking tables, coffee or beer in hand, pumped full of paracetamol from the bender you had last night and tell me I'm a fucking junkie? Fuck you, the world is made of stupid. I can't wait to move to Amsterdamn so I dont have to go on runs in the middle of the night for some weed and constantly look over my shoulder for fear of cops who will stop me because I have the unfortunate luck of being racially profiled.

These fear campaigns make me laugh, I've used smack and coke before, and the highs were well worth it, but I went into these drugs only for the experience, never for the lifestyle. The people who believe you turn into a skin peeling freak after one hit are the same people who suck and preach this shit up.

I keep saying it time and time again, what are people doing about prescription drugs? I got 2 scripts for panadeine forte the other day, that shit knocked me out harder than weed and I can easily go back for some more. Give some of those to the wrong people and see what comes of it. Prescription drugs are way too easy to obtain and it aint to hard to find a shoddy Indian doctor more than happy to prescribe it so he can get some patient flow.

Weed will never become a legalised drug in western societies. There are too many groups who will flog the shit out of the government for doing so, and heaven forbid the government will do such a thing to jepeodise itself. But if the government wants to control addictions and stem drug use then they have to deal with the real problems, but that's another issue altogether. Simply put, making an ad is sooo much easier and cheaper, so why not take the opportunity to show the public you are doing something in government? Junkies do a well enough job at keeping themselves out of sight so the government doesn't have to worry too much about them spoiling any of their wonderful campaigns.
 

lostclause

New member
Mar 31, 2009
1,860
0
0
Never plan on using them, but our government made it mandatory to have picture on the front of cigarette packs and they're pretty horrific. I hate passing them at the supermarket.
 

bmf185

New member
Jan 8, 2009
418
0
0
That was a pretty awesome spot, OP.

I'd agree to saying "DON'T!" to harder things like meth, coke, heroin, etc., but when it comes to alcohol or marijuana it is different for me. I'd say to just be smart about it since I know people are going to do it anyway (kind of like sex, eh?).
 

open trap

New member
Feb 26, 2009
1,653
0
0
on the history channel they have a series they show occasionly about drugs and there origins. its just strait up facts like it slows your heart rate and constricts cirrculation etc. its not going around saying drugs are bad blatenly. you need to be intelligent to know what it is talking about
 

open trap

New member
Feb 26, 2009
1,653
0
0
Jinx_Dragon said:
Great another US add that tells you absolutely NOTHING!

Honestly, what the hell is with US ads and doing nothing more then shock value? They mostly are ridiculous, over the top or so vague you don't know what the hell they are talking about. If it wasn't for the 'meth tag' at the end I would think this was more an advertisement for don't return to an abusive boyfriend or something like that. Honestly the woman looked more like someone who has taken one too many punches to the face and not someone who had done meth.

Worse, they made it sound like you will just 'poof' into such an abused soul from one toke on ice. Know what this does? It makes people LESS likely to respect the dangers when they get told by their friends and other users 'look, I've done it. I've still got a productive life, get laid a lot and do I look like the walking dead to you? Come, try some, it will make you feel great.'

They really need to fire whoever comes up with these ads and get someone who will tell the truth about drug abuse. Hell, they where working with Meth! Honestly, how do you screw that up?!

Look, the sad reality is you can not convince a person not to do a drug in a five seconds, it just can NOT be done. That is why these shock value adds contain no information within them what so ever, it is too much information to condense within a sound bite. These 'dont' do it cause we told you not to' ads are a joke. They do NOT help stop the problem of drug abuse in any way, and worse we are paying someone to produce them and then a fee each time they are shown on TV. The best case situations it makes someone curious as to why drugs are bad, though usually after they have tried some! The worse case situations it makes people laugh at the true dangers as they start down the road to drug abuse problems, all cause they have tried a drug once and nothing bad happened like they where told it would happen.

Interesting side note: The Meth problem likely would not even exist if it wasn't for prohibition! It was embraced as a way to get around watches on the chemicals used to make amphetamines, as the ingredients for meth where more easily purchased over the counter so have less chance of being caught. Way to go prohibition, amphetamines are bad enough but thank you for making it's more dangerous 'big brother' more common place....

Second side note: Meth is scheduled as a LESS dangerous drug then cannabis as it has medical usage. Does that not tell you how fucked up the government's view on drugs is all by itself?

Where am I coming from to be saying these things?
I used drugs at one point in my life, still have a fondness for the occasional recreational drug, yet I became curious about the truth behind prohibition. All because nothing horrid happened to me when I started toking on a joint regardless of the horrors the government tried to teach me. Particuarlly seeing drug use in this period of my life was a POSITIVE thing, one of the major reasons why I am able to function as well as I do and am not a corpse.

What I found was 95% (made up number, but about there I would safely bet) of what you are told by the government concerning drugs is pure bullshit! That scared me more then the 5% of truth, cause it means most of the time people are going to ignore the other 5% believing even that percent is nothing but government spewed bullshit. This I believe is more dangerous then drug abuse itself, cause we really do need to be teaching people truth about drugs! There is quite a lot of negatives surrounding them and very few people will have the curiosity and resolve to search for the truth themselves...

But fuck, I guess it is just easier to produce meaningless 'shock' ads and then getting off your arse and tackling the real problems that lead to drug abuse.
thats actuly insaulting, we have education in schools about these drugs, those are ment for the crowd who are lickly to do drugs to give a glimpse of them in the future. so fuck off
 

benylor

New member
May 30, 2009
276
0
0
open trap said:
thats actuly insaulting, we have education in schools about these drugs, those are ment for the crowd who are lickly to do drugs to give a glimpse of them in the future. so fuck off
That's all well and good, but the whole point of Jinx Dragon's post that you found so "insaulting" is that the education about the drugs that is given is a mix of truth and bullshit - which is very very harmful.

I'll explain: Look at alcohol for an example. Let's say you've been taught that alcohol is very, very dangerous - drink it and you'll instantly feel terrible and start throwing up. Also, if you keep drinking for a long period, you're likely to suffer long term damage.

Then, you see some friends drinking - and they seem quite happy with it. At this point, you discover that the first thing you were taught is a lie - which leads you to ignore the other half of the message. Then, there's a risk that you'll see no downside to drinking - you'll start and then you won't stop. You don't feel terrible, you're sensible enough to stop when it starts to make you feel unwell, but you end up drinking every day.

The trouble is, the bit about the long term damage isn't a lie - 30 years of non-stop drinking ends up taking it's toll. Bang, heart attack.

-

This is what your education about these drugs is doing. It claims meth is bad and causes a lot of harm, and that you really shouldn't be trying it. Good. That's a bloody noble cause. Then it goes and ruins it by saying that cannabis means you WILL get testicular cancer, you WILL move on to harder drugs, and you WILL become a paranoid schizophrenic. We _know_ that cannabis doesn't do that, so the danger is that we disbelieve the truth of meth being dangerous.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
open trap said:
thats actuly insaulting, we have education in schools about these drugs, those are ment for the crowd who are lickly to do drugs to give a glimpse of them in the future. so fuck off
I'm going to overlook all the fuck off's and stuff, they tend to show a mentality that has no ability to truly comprehend an argument. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that your quick two sentence reply is because you feel your point is stronger then it really is, that you don't need to elaborate on how the education helps or what these ads achieve.

Firsts lets have a look at that education shall we. How many people here can remember being told not to touch cannabis because it leads to harder drugs? That it will make you stupid by killing important brain cells? That it will make you go maaaaad?! And over all that it will ruin your life? No one really tells you facts such as a multi-million dollar banker is currently on the federal cannabis trails. Hell they don't even like mentioning the fact the federal government trailed cannabis before shelving it as soon as they realised they where not getting the desired results. t failed to prove the governments 'cannabis is useless as medication' stance and like many other government backed programs to find the dangers of cannabis it now has to be berried as deep as possible.

My argument is quite simple: These deliberate lies and obscuring of 'unsavoury' facts does NOT protect people from drug abuse. It makes them more vulnerable, as they will not have a true education into the subject matter. Trying to scare someone so they won't start doesn't work when they look at the drug culture later on and fail to see all the horror stories coming true. This is particularly true with cannabis, which is why I use it as an example a lot. Cannabis is the most common illegal substance you will be exposed to, and hence the most likely you will compare to what the government told you about it. Then you see the government is fill of shit on this one matter and are more likely to discard the rest, even when they might not have lied... such as with meth.

Oh and saying so and so TV shows or third party sources are doing a good job on educating about drugs doesn't cut it. They are not showing these series in schools and for the most part they are not letting them near the students. They are keeping up the 'scare them off drug' ridiculous bullshit. Cause the truth is not good for a setting of trying to prevent drug abuse, it really just raises the question on why so many illegal substance are illegal in the first place.


Now about these ads being there to teach people what you will look like afterwards? Well like I said they are too damn vague. There was no meth in the ad, it wasn't clear that she was going over to her friends house to do drugs, or that she was doing anything even relating to drugs... unless you consider sneaking out to be 'oh no, drugs!' Like I said, she looks more like a beat up whore and it more implied from the posture that A) drugs alone did it (after you find out this is a anti-drug ad) and B) it happened fast (as she still was young behind that grime.) Like I said, before the anti-meth tag on the end I was thinking the ad was about not letting yourself be abused. That alone means the ad failed big time: No recognition.

If this add was really focused on the long term effects why not do something that points out it is the long term effect. Why not take successful looking people in their young twenties, then 'age them' digitally till they are about sixty or so. Make sure you show underneath the age caption, so people can clearly see this is long term use. Beside that do the same but add in the common effects of meth, a label on top can clearly show which is which. As meth can mess you up physically the one with meth should look like a withered corpse by the time the ad is done. Then leave it as a open question to the viewer: Do you want to look like this? or something along those lines.

So I guess my biggest gripe with the ad: Don't make it damn vague!
 

Captain_Caveman

New member
Mar 21, 2009
792
0
0
I think the BIGGEST problem is that they categorize all illegal drugs as "Drugs"

Like they have anything in common (besides being illegal)

Anybody who knows anything about "drugs" knows that weed is less harmful than asprin.
But crack, meth, heroin, even (legal) pain killers are leaps and bounds more harmful & addictive.

It's like how they say weed is a gateway drug. No, weed isnt causing people to try other drugs.
It's the retarded drug campaigns that categorize them all together. As if they're the same.

Weed is prolific, so when people eventually come in contact w/ it, a certain percentage who dont do independent research and have been exposed to this "drugs are bad" marketing suddenly think that hey all "drugs" must be ok.