Great another US add that tells you absolutely NOTHING!
Honestly, what the hell is with US ads and doing nothing more then shock value? They mostly are ridiculous, over the top or so vague you don't know what the hell they are talking about. If it wasn't for the 'meth tag' at the end I would think this was more an advertisement for don't return to an abusive boyfriend or something like that. Honestly the woman looked more like someone who has taken one too many punches to the face and not someone who had done meth.
Worse, they made it sound like you will just 'poof' into such an abused soul from one toke on ice. Know what this does? It makes people LESS likely to respect the dangers when they get told by their friends and other users 'look, I've done it. I've still got a productive life, get laid a lot and do I look like the walking dead to you? Come, try some, it will make you feel great.'
They really need to fire whoever comes up with these ads and get someone who will tell the truth about drug abuse. Hell, they where working with Meth! Honestly, how do you screw that up?!
Look, the sad reality is you can not convince a person not to do a drug in a five seconds, it just can NOT be done. That is why these shock value adds contain no information within them what so ever, it is too much information to condense within a sound bite. These 'dont' do it cause we told you not to' ads are a joke. They do NOT help stop the problem of drug abuse in any way, and worse we are paying someone to produce them and then a fee each time they are shown on TV. The best case situations it makes someone curious as to why drugs are bad, though usually after they have tried some! The worse case situations it makes people laugh at the true dangers as they start down the road to drug abuse problems, all cause they have tried a drug once and nothing bad happened like they where told it would happen.
Interesting side note: The Meth problem likely would not even exist if it wasn't for prohibition! It was embraced as a way to get around watches on the chemicals used to make amphetamines, as the ingredients for meth where more easily purchased over the counter so have less chance of being caught. Way to go prohibition, amphetamines are bad enough but thank you for making it's more dangerous 'big brother' more common place....
Second side note: Meth is scheduled as a LESS dangerous drug then cannabis as it has medical usage. Does that not tell you how fucked up the government's view on drugs is all by itself?
Where am I coming from to be saying these things?
I used drugs at one point in my life, still have a fondness for the occasional recreational drug, yet I became curious about the truth behind prohibition. All because nothing horrid happened to me when I started toking on a joint regardless of the horrors the government tried to teach me. Particuarlly seeing drug use in this period of my life was a POSITIVE thing, one of the major reasons why I am able to function as well as I do and am not a corpse.
What I found was 95% (made up number, but about there I would safely bet) of what you are told by the government concerning drugs is pure bullshit! That scared me more then the 5% of truth, cause it means most of the time people are going to ignore the other 5% believing even that percent is nothing but government spewed bullshit. This I believe is more dangerous then drug abuse itself, cause we really do need to be teaching people truth about drugs! There is quite a lot of negatives surrounding them and very few people will have the curiosity and resolve to search for the truth themselves...
But fuck, I guess it is just easier to produce meaningless 'shock' ads and then getting off your arse and tackling the real problems that lead to drug abuse.