Don't get over to Britain much, do you? We don't really do too many "uproars". Especially when people can just chalk it up too "American arrogance" and then stop caring.Frost27 said:If I were to go to Great Britain and demand that the British flag be covered because it might offend me on the 4th of July, it would cause an uproar.
I'd suggest getting your snout out of the BNP Trough of Bullshit and stop embarrassing yourself.Dark Harbinger said:Hahahahaha! Wrong my friend, all the anti-hate nonsense and political correctness has long since strangled any public signs of patriotism, it's all well and good for immigrants to parade around the streets proclaiming their religious dominance, waving their flags and chanting death to the west. But woe betide any British person if they wave their flag, oh egads, it might offend the immigrants!!Frost27 said:If I were to go to Great Britain and demand that the British flag be covered because it might offend me on the 4th of July, it would cause an uproar.
This is the lunacy we contend with, we don't even have freedom of speech, and it is being eroded by the euphemism of hate speech laws, it's fine for immigrants to sail into this country, swamp entire towns and run them into poverty ridden, disease carrying slums. And all they have to do is point at one of us and complain we're being racist, and wahey! It's off to the cells for you.
Yeah I'm bitter that my own country is being eaten by parasites...we seriously need a constitution like our American cousins...with a 1st Amendment, a 2nd Amendment would be nice too...one can hope.
Fuck me, I bet you did well in Maths. 1.5 billion Muslims on the planet (I'll assume you're going for the Muslims; unoriginal, but then idiots like you don't have much imagination), and (something like) 3 million in the UK as of 2010, and you're convinced they all want to blow us up.Dark Harbinger said:From what I've seen over the years, they've yet to prove me wrong.jaded zombie said:wtf?Dark Harbinger said:it's all well and good for immigrants to parade around the streets proclaiming their religious dominance, waving their flags and chanting death to the west.
yeah, cuz every immigrant is a terrorist cell waiting to happen...
This very much. Especially if they actually only wore the shirts to piss off the ones celebrating Cinco de Mayo.SamuelT said:I fail to sympathise with the lads and their families who immediately took it upon themselves to sue and demand money just because they were asked to turn their shirts inside out.
I don't get why more people don't spot this. It's the first thing i thought.Dags90 said:They didn't wear American flags because they were proud of their country. They wore them to antagonize Mexican-American students who were celebrating something they didn't happen to be a part of. It's a terrible and offensive use of the flag.
I'd like to buy you a beer, what's your poison?Woodsey said:Don't get over to Britain much, do you? We don't really do too many "uproars". Especially when people can just chalk it up too "American arrogance" and then stop caring.Frost27 said:If I were to go to Great Britain and demand that the British flag be covered because it might offend me on the 4th of July, it would cause an uproar.
I'd suggest getting your snout out of the BNP Trough of Bullshit and stop embarrassing yourself.Dark Harbinger said:Hahahahaha! Wrong my friend, all the anti-hate nonsense and political correctness has long since strangled any public signs of patriotism, it's all well and good for immigrants to parade around the streets proclaiming their religious dominance, waving their flags and chanting death to the west. But woe betide any British person if they wave their flag, oh egads, it might offend the immigrants!!Frost27 said:If I were to go to Great Britain and demand that the British flag be covered because it might offend me on the 4th of July, it would cause an uproar.
This is the lunacy we contend with, we don't even have freedom of speech, and it is being eroded by the euphemism of hate speech laws, it's fine for immigrants to sail into this country, swamp entire towns and run them into poverty ridden, disease carrying slums. And all they have to do is point at one of us and complain we're being racist, and wahey! It's off to the cells for you.
Yeah I'm bitter that my own country is being eaten by parasites...we seriously need a constitution like our American cousins...with a 1st Amendment, a 2nd Amendment would be nice too...one can hope.
As for British patriotism, British culture is not the same as American culture, we don't exert the same levels of patriotism or in the same ways because we aren't the same people.
Yes, sometimes some people are overly-sensitive and try to implement stupid rules. No, they're nowhere near as common place as the Daily Mail would try and have everyone believe.
Fuck me, I bet you did well in Maths. 1.5 billion Muslims on the planet (I'll assume you're going for the Muslims; unoriginal, but then idiots like you don't have much imagination), and (something like) 3 million in the UK as of 2010, and you're convinced they all want to blow us up.Dark Harbinger said:From what I've seen over the years, they've yet to prove me wrong.jaded zombie said:wtf?Dark Harbinger said:it's all well and good for immigrants to parade around the streets proclaiming their religious dominance, waving their flags and chanting death to the west.
yeah, cuz every immigrant is a terrorist cell waiting to happen...
Pro tip: if 3 million people wanted to kill everyone in this country using terrorist tactics, they'd have fucking done it by now.
OT: Seems an overreaction, but if it was a temporary thing to prevent tensions running any higher, then I don't think its ludicrous. Especially if there'd been trouble the previous year (caused by the American students).
Why should wearing the flag of the nation they are currently citizens of be a point of conflict?jaded zombie said:so, the school was just trying to avoid conflict
okay, no big deal...
People dont WANT to spot it.justcallmeslow said:I don't get why more people don't spot this. It's the first thing i thought.Dags90 said:They didn't wear American flags because they were proud of their country. They wore them to antagonize Mexican-American students who were celebrating something they didn't happen to be a part of. It's a terrible and offensive use of the flag.
I'm not sure trying to stop them was the best response though, perhaps put them through the standard school punishment system (detention or whatever) without restricting their freedom of speech. Show you support their freedom to speak but not their choice to be antagonistic and xenophobic.
Wearin the flag of the nation they are currently a citizen of is a point of conflict when the people doin so are only wearin the flag as a direct insult to others. These kids chose a very specific day (Cinco de Mayo) to wear the American flag as a shirt. They didn't do it to show nationalistic pride. They didn't do it because they love America. They did it to be massive dicks and made them look like (if they actually aren't) racist twits.Lilani said:Why should wearing the flag of the nation they are currently citizens of be a point of conflict?jaded zombie said:so, the school was just trying to avoid conflict
okay, no big deal...
The point of school is to prepare students for the real world. Sheltering them from any possible conflict or difference in opinion is doing them no favors. Of course they should make sure these differences never turn to violence, but if a simple shirt bearing their resident nation's flag is a problem I don't think removing the flag from sight solves the root issue.
While I disagree, you do make valid points and I can see your argument. Unfortunately the article does not say whether "tensions were building" and it does not convey whether or not the students wore the shirts in a "Lets show those Mexican's" versus a patriotic purpose, versus a "You can celebrate Cinco de Mayo based on where you are from, but don't forget where you are".Dastardly said:I side with the school, because I understand how decisions like this are made.Frost27 said:How do you feel about this?
Wearing the flag is not inflammatory per se. But wearing the flag specifically to be jerks to another group? That's different. The students weren't trying to show patriotric pride. They were mocking, taunting, or otherwise going after the patriotic pride of others.
Now, is it possible the kids doing the whole Mexican flag thing were also just trying to stir up trouble? Sure. It's possible the whole episode was one big, "I dare ya to say something!" The problem is, if that was the case, that the "USA" group took the dare.
We want to turn it into something about the flag, but it's not. It's about one group of kids trying to goad another group of kids into an altercation. They were using the flag, not honoring it.
The school's decision had nothing to do with the flag. It had to do with the fact that a group of kids were trying to pick a fight with another group of kids, and trying to hide that behind the technicality of "it's just a flag." The school wisely saw through the ruse and said, "No, you're trying to stir the shit. We'll have none of it."
Why? Because if even the slightest bit of violence had occurred between those kids:
1. Someone would have played up any injuries and made a big deal.
2. Someone would claim the school should have "seen it coming," so they're at fault.
3. Someone would contact the ACLU to get lawyers involved.
4. Everyone would sue the school, rather than each other, because the school is more likely to have money.
If two kids were trying to turn your yard into a battleground, you would remove them so that you don't get sued when they hurt each other.
As I wrote in my edit:shintakie10 said:Wearin the flag of the nation they are currently a citizen of is a point of conflict when the people doin so are only wearin the flag as a direct insult to others. These kids chose a very specific day (Cinco de Mayo) to wear the American flag as a shirt. They didn't do it to show nationalistic pride. They didn't do it because they love America. They did it to be massive dicks and made them look like (if they actually aren't) racist twits.Lilani said:Why should wearing the flag of the nation they are currently citizens of be a point of conflict?jaded zombie said:so, the school was just trying to avoid conflict
okay, no big deal...
The point of school is to prepare students for the real world. Sheltering them from any possible conflict or difference in opinion is doing them no favors. Of course they should make sure these differences never turn to violence, but if a simple shirt bearing their resident nation's flag is a problem I don't think removing the flag from sight solves the root issue.
exactily what i was thinking.Dags90 said:Well, I'm glad to have been proven right in my guess that this was legal when this story first cropped up.
School children don't have absolute free speech, if the school can prove that the shirts are disruptive (say, for inciting ethnic tensions), then they can be told not to wear them. I think it's silly to conflate what are clearly ethnic tensions with patriotism. They didn't wear American flags because they were proud of their country. They wore them to antagonize Mexican-American students who were celebrating something they didn't happen to be a part of. It's a terrible and offensive use of the flag.
I should also note, that it was once considered wildly inappropriate, and gauche to print an American flag decoration on any item of clothing. I still think of it as kind of tacky, it's a gross form of plastic patriotism.
It's also in the Flag Code, which is strictly voluntary, but I wonder if any of these alleged patriots have ever read it.