Irridium said:
All the time. When a women has sex with a bunch of men, she's labeled a slut. But if a man does it, he's labeled as gay.
It's bullshit I tell you.
Actually, as long as she doesn't have a desease, shes not a slut, shes a hooker then.
I don't know, woman getting the child in divorce cases EVEN if their a bad parent.
peruvianskys said:
Here are some of the complaints men have:
- If I break something, a woman will blame me but I can't blame a woman for breaking something.
- I can't make jokes about hitting a woman but women can joke about hitting me.
- I'm not allowed to stare at women's bodies but women are allowed to stare at me.
- I can't use derogatory language directed towards women but women can.
Here are some complaints women have:
- One out of every five women will be raped, but only one out of 165 men will be.
- I work the same job as a man, but get paid on average twenty-five cents less an hour.
- I have a 300% higher chance of being murdered by my spouse than a man does.
- I am more likely to die of gender-neutral diseases, and a lower percentage of medical funding goes towards my sex-specific diseases despite their prevalence being higher.
- The vast majority of religious organizations will not allow me any semblance of authority or power despite me showing equal skill with a man.
In short, stop fucking whining, you over-privileged brats. Boo fucking hoo. No one cares if you can't stare at tits or that you have to be extra nice to those pesky ladies, lest they period themselves everywhere over you. Until you're afraid of walking home in the dark, I don't care.
So, you skip legal cases to where woman get something extra over a man, but then continue to dwadle on small stuff.
Sweetie, I'll just point this out, above is the only thing to add to the Male side, ALONG WITH, BUT ARE NOT CONTAINED TO OTHER LEGAL CASINGS, SUCH AS DOMESTIC DISPUTES, LAWSUITS, AND MANY MORE IN THE WORLD BOOK!
Simple fact, a killer can be a man or woman, and theres a show, go to Tru Tv and check it out, its called Snapped, its ALL about woman murdering their husband, come back with a straight face and tell me thats not something wrong. I'm scared to walk in the dark because PEOPLE HAVE GUNS, I, IF I HAVE MONEY, THEY WILL POINT IT AT ME, REGARDLESS OF GENDER! And on your last one about religions, THEIR BLOODY RELIGIONS, THEIR FUCKING RULES ARE FROM A BEGONE TIME OF SEXISM!
I am suddenly reminded of case to where a woman took a shotgun and blew out the brains of her husband, then got let go because she said the man abused her, I never read to far into it, but from what I understood or took from it, there weren't any signs of him being abusing, of course, sometimes I am wrong. But all the evidence pointed to her taking the shotgun, putting it to his temple then firing. But since he was abusive its OK to kill someone.
Simple fact, were not whining when there ARE double standards in place for woman to be over men, probably more so infact, but their not looked at because a large amount of phyco feminists [sub]*not the ones that are upstanding, actually fighting for equality, but the ones that use their beliefs in feminism to be overall asses.*[/sub] Would be-head anyone saying so.
Jaime_Wolf said:
Yes, equality does demand respect for men too. Yes, there are double standards that negatively impact men too.
But Jesus Christ are you missing the point if you think that the double standards men face are comparable in scope to those faced by women.
We have a few bigger fucking problems than the fact that men are more liable to be called out by women for mistakes (to the extent that this is even true - women just get fucked over in different ways for mistakes).
Quick hand raise, how many woman fought in the original rising of woman power... Lets see, not a lot, now lets look at feminists in general.... A lot, alright, how many guys were alive back then.... Not a lot, how many are sorry for what their ancestors did, EVEN THOUGH they weren't alive back then.... A lot. There you go, we now have a formal understanding of a bridge we must build and then cross to get over it.
Again, I'm a guy, I am so sorry that I would spend time to build a resort specifically for woman for free. But I wasn't alive back then, A LOT of people weren't alive back then, I couldn't have stopped my fellow men from being dimwits, and sure as hell woman today can't go back and add numbers to the woman fighting force, persay. You can't hold a gender to its mistakes when a large percent weren't even babies being formed in their mothers stomachs to fix it.
My point is simple: What woman faced back then was TERRIBLE, but is it that bad now, honestly, can woman today NOT have a career, not become CEOs or do what they wish on their wildest wims? No, they can do ALL that and more, holding something or someone back after the fact and not noticing the changes now in days urks me. Specifically when you sai "What those women FACED." Past tense, FUCKING PAST TENSE! RIGHT THERE IS MY POINT, THEY FACED IT, OVER CAME IT VICTOURISLY, CAN WE PLEASE BUILD A FUCKING BRIDGE, AND GET OVER THIS HOLDING BACK GUYS FOR SOMETHING THEY DIDN'T EVEN SEE BEFORE THEY WERE BORN, THANK YOU!
[sub]*sorry if I offended, but I get a special type of URKED from these threads.*[/sub]