You can only be high if you're at high school.The infamous SCAMola said:Man, that's bullshit! If I want to be high while at school, I have all the right to!
Anyway, I think the idea is stupid, totally unnecessary and a waste of funding.
You can only be high if you're at high school.The infamous SCAMola said:Man, that's bullshit! If I want to be high while at school, I have all the right to!
Anyway, I think the idea is stupid, totally unnecessary and a waste of funding.
Oh, but I'm sure resorting to childish name calling is an argument, right?Vilhelm said:Yeah. That isn't an argument, y'tosser.The infamous SCAMola said:So? It's a stupid law anyway. Fuckin' Alcohol is worse than weed.
Yeah, we're stepping into "crime doesn't fit the punishment" zone here.nilus2k said:Personally I think they should report positive tests to the police as well.
If the kid was really a good kid it would be a first offense and it would lead to probation and consoling. He or She would probably at most get a suspension at school(if it were a public school).MusicalFreedom said:you would potentially fuck up a student's future because of drugs. is that what you're really saying? wouldn't counselling or whatever be better? because the way the police is at the moment, they would probably just chuck the kid in juvie for a bit, and an experience like that (however short) has the potential to make a criminal of someone who just does a few misdemeanours, which is unforgivable.nilus2k said:Personally I think they should report positive tests to the police as well.
Well yeah maybe. Its illegal. A CRIME. You do a crime and you get caught you go to jail. Its a kid and assuming its a first time offense, the most they will get is some court ordered consuling and probation. If we are lucky maybe a night in Jail.The infamous SCAMola said:Yeah, we're stepping into "crime doesn't fit the punishment" zone here.nilus2k said:Personally I think they should report positive tests to the police as well.
I you report them to the police... and then what? They arrest them? For smoking weed?
The infamous SCAMola said:Yeah, we're stepping into "crime doesn't fit the punishment" zone here.nilus2k said:Personally I think they should report positive tests to the police as well.
I you report them to the police... and then what? They arrest them? For smoking weed?
Sounds stupid to me.Sovvolf said:I never attended class becuase I was out being too cool for school having a fun time, but I wasnt stupid I was just foolish, just becuase people have a fun go out and have fun, misbehave and such doesnt mean there uninteligent.
I could see that, I suppose. I'm just wary of keeping the good "good", rather than letting the bad influence of criminals drag them down.nilus2k said:If the kid was really a good kid it would be a first offense and it would lead to probation and consoling. He or She would probably at most get a suspension at school(if it were a public school).
I or the people doing it wouldn't be fucking up a kids life, he/she would be. I don't want to sound like a hard ass or sound naive. I know kids experiment, but that doesn't mean we should go lite on them if they do. They need to learn the consequences of there actions.
I'm afraid that you are wrong in a legal sense here because everyone has the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty. Non-compliance does not imply that a crime is or has been committed nor that the person is trying to hide a crime. Consider the following:Amnestic said:It's pissing in a cup. If you refuse to do it, then that implies guilt and gives them probable cause. If you agree, you're giving your consent.
You need to learn the consequences of bad grammar; people can't understand you.nilus2k said:If the kid was really a good kid it would be a first offense and it would lead to probation and consoling. He or She would probably at most get a suspension at school(if it were a public school).MusicalFreedom said:you would potentially fuck up a student's future because of drugs. is that what you're really saying? wouldn't counselling or whatever be better? because the way the police is at the moment, they would probably just chuck the kid in juvie for a bit, and an experience like that (however short) has the potential to make a criminal of someone who just does a few misdemeanours, which is unforgivable.nilus2k said:Personally I think they should report positive tests to the police as well.
I or the people doing it wouldn't be fucking up a kids life, he/she would be. I don't want to sound like a hard ass or sound naive. I know kids experiment, but that doesn't mean we should go lite on them if they do. They need to learn the consequences of there actions.
Smoking a joint is a misdemeanor, not a felony. So as much as you wish we all lived in a Draconian nation, you cannot go to jail for smoking pot.nilus2k said:Well yeah maybe. Its illegal. A CRIME. You do a crime and you get caught you go to jail. Its a kid and assuming its a first time offense, the most they will get is some court ordered consuling and probation. If we are lucky maybe a night in Jail.The infamous SCAMola said:Yeah, we're stepping into "crime doesn't fit the punishment" zone here.nilus2k said:Personally I think they should report positive tests to the police as well.
I you report them to the police... and then what? They arrest them? For smoking weed?
Just because you don't believe something should be against the law doesn't mean it isn't. I think taxes are fucking stupid but I sure as hell know if I cheat on them and get caught I am going to jail.
Surely an idiot test would be more effective.Abedeus said:Cool. If it thins out the numbers of idiots, then yes please. Drug tests for everyone.
Depends on the drug, the chemical drugs stay in the system a few days, the natural ones for the most part only stay around a month. This topic is old news, the supreme court has alreday said it's ok for schools to do it, get over it and move on.Cpt_Oblivious said:My school has random drugs tests occasionally but nothing's come of it.
The only thing to remember is that drugs stay in the body for something like 2 months or more.
Uh, yeah. I had lots of fun in high school, but that doesn't change the fact that my school was populated with idiots.Sovvolf said:Wow, did you have any fun at all at school?? its funny but you look down at people like these like people like you used to do to me at school, I was moved up in history in my school becuase I excelled beyond my class, I went from the bottom class right to the top becuase of this, and when I walked in this class a student like you commented on me, saying "I think you have the wrong class, this is for the intelligent students" to which I embarrased him in front of the class by asking him what to me was basic historical trivia that he couldnt answer such as who were forces fighting at the battle of theyomopoly (He stated Egyptions versus the romans), or the death of the year the version queen died (1603), who assinated Gias Julius Caesar and at what date, this student couldnt answer one of them and sat down.LaBambaMan said:Ok, so maybe I was being a bit harsh. I was, however, speaking from my experiences of high school, which only ended 5 years ago. Maybe you've got a better school system then I had, but most high school students in my area were either vapid whores who couldn't keep their legs shut or moronic stoner kids who thought they were hardcore by breaking the law.MusicalFreedom said:my high school only suspected people who deserved suspicion, rather than hoisting it upon people who don't act suspicious in any way. there was no problem with this. why change it all of a sudden?LaBambaMan said:If I learned anything while in high school it's that the authority shouldn't trust high school kids. I mean, for the most part, they're idiots with egos the size of a planet.
actually, we did have talk of sniffer dogs coming in one day, but I never saw them. maybe the head changed his mind.
in any case, the administration needs to at least put on a face of trusting the students. drug testing for people who are applying for things that don't really have much to do with drugs would make people angry, more likely to disbehave, and for what? some kid toking up?
despite the edgy "cynical" view that all high schoolers are idiotic rule-breakers that need to be kept in line by AUTHORITAH, they're really more intelligent than people realise (though they often misdirect their intelligence, or forget it occasionally). they know when they're being treated unfairly, and they would raise some kind of shit about it, even if it's just low-level disturbance.
as far as I can tell, this kind of drug testing results in more work, for results that really aren't worth the effort.
The more intelligent students in my graduating class(myself included) were trusted because we gave the staff a reason to trust us. Our girlfriends weren't pregnant, we showed up on time, we did our work, and we didn't reek of pot and ask stupid questions that are common knowledge. Then again, we also had a very large "gangsta" population who was, amazingly, comprised of my school's most dim witted students(like the one guy who asked what Pearl Harbor Day was).
So I apologize if I offend with my comments, because i'm basing my cynical attitude off my previous experience and the idiots I see around the local shopping mall. Then again, this is the suburbs of D.C., the home of the morons.
Your probably not as arogant as that kid but it really gets to me when people look down on others for such things, if you had met me at school then you would have thought I'd have been as dim-witted as those gangsta's your talking about and if you read my handwriting or my spelling then you'd think worse, I never attended class becuase I was out being too cool for school having a fun time, but I wasnt stupid I was just foolish, just becuase people have a fun go out and have fun, misbehave and such doesnt mean there uninteligent.
Yeah, but then some teachers would have to go too...beddo said:Surely an idiot test would be more effective.Abedeus said:Cool. If it thins out the numbers of idiots, then yes please. Drug tests for everyone.