Marcus Attell said:
Shoot, in an age where you have Metal Detectors at the entrance to schools, School nurses who would willingly prescribe Ridillin to children, and Strip searching honor students for "Ibuprofen", I think that Drug testing in schools is a little, um, Lame(?) as far as school policies go.
Ok, I have to ask- ibuprofen? I take that for migraines, I wasn't aware that it was dodgy in any way. In fact the reason I take it is because I was having to take codeine so often I was worried i might accidentally develop an addiction. Why in god's name where they searching for ibuprofen?
Back on topic, I have to wonder what they'll actually achieve with this policy, and I think that what effects it has is a more important factor than whether it's morally or legally justified. I've never touched drugs (alcohol excluded naturally), but I can't see what kicking me out of the debate club would have achieved if I had just experimented once or twice.
Extra curricular activities aren't just privileges, they're opportunities for further learning and character building. Are excluding students from them really going to make them less likely to do drugs?
And how will these tests discriminate between good students that just got curious, and habitual users that really are a problem?
ON the other hand, I kinda support the parking permit aspect of it. The car park at my school was pretty hectic, kids all over the place, and some people refuse to accept that drugs affect your ability to drive, just because they can't perceive the effects themselves. It's an extreme measure, but it potentially saves lives.