EA and Valve are Pretty Similar

Recommended Videos

TallestGargoyle

Regular Member
Oct 31, 2011
68
0
11
TaintedSaint said:
Valve has only release other peoples stuff. Portal ..Started as a mod...Counter Strike ...same. Not to mention the blatant disrespect and down right mean spirited way they troll us about Half life.. In a lot of ways Valve is worse than Ea at least EA does not try and Fake who they are we all know EA are jerks,Valve have been tricking us into thinking they are a good company for years.
Thing is, if EA tried to do the teasing the fans thing they'd charge for it as DLC.

At least Valve give us the Half Life teasing for free!
 

subtlefuge

Lord Cromulent
May 21, 2010
1,107
0
0
geK0 said:
The key difference is that EA makes so many poor quality, over budgeted, poorly planned/scheduled sequels out of their franchises that they just end up running them into the ground, while Valve takes a ludicrous amount of time to come out with sequels but tends to do a good job of it.
Also EA charges for DLC while valve usually does not, in fact, Valve has a tendency to continue developing content for their games free of charge for years after they are released (hats don't count), while EA charges for extra content the day their games come out.
The idea is that with every new update comes an opportunity to:

a. create a new customer
b. increase loyalty in current customers
c. do something interesting that helps with future game development

It's a different style of thinking. Valve doesn't care about money any less than EA does, they just aren't in a race to cut as many throats as possible and sow dissent among their fans like EA is.
 

geK0

New member
Jun 24, 2011
1,846
0
0
subtlefuge said:
Exactly! Valve tries to get more customers, EA tries to get more money per customer; naturally, people are going to prefer the former to the ladder.
 

Terminate421

New member
Jul 21, 2010
5,773
0
0
[ul]This explains my feelings of this thread [http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=5937881][/ul]
 

redisforever

New member
Oct 5, 2009
2,158
0
0
I do want to mention though, that EA published Valve's titles on consoles. Also, Steam was made before Half-Life 2, not after. Besides that, I loved it. Thank you.

EDIT: Whoops! Sorry, not just console, I meant all of Valve's retail games are distributed by EA.
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
TallestGargoyle said:
TaintedSaint said:
Valve has only release other peoples stuff. Portal ..Started as a mod...Counter Strike ...same. Not to mention the blatant disrespect and down right mean spirited way they troll us about Half life.. In a lot of ways Valve is worse than Ea at least EA does not try and Fake who they are we all know EA are jerks,Valve have been tricking us into thinking they are a good company for years.
Thing is, if EA tried to do the teasing the fans thing they'd charge for it as DLC.

At least Valve give us the Half Life teasing for free!
I almost hate to admit it, but this made me laugh heartily. Namely because I could actually imagine it happening.

Oh God...I can see it now...

"New from EA! It's the teaser for the trailer for that new game we've been telling you you should be excited about! Download it now for only $10!!"
 

Krion_Vark

New member
Mar 25, 2010
1,700
0
0
geK0 said:
The key difference is that EA makes so many poor quality, over budgeted, poorly planned/scheduled sequels out of their franchises that they just end up running them into the ground, while Valve takes a ludicrous amount of time to come out with sequels but tends to do a good job of it.
Also EA charges for DLC while valve usually does not, in fact, Valve has a tendency to continue developing content for their games free of charge for years after they are released (hats don't count), while EA charges for extra content the day their games come out.
Left 4 Dead and Left 4 Dead 2 would like a word with you about ludicrous amount of time.
 

Alternative

New member
Jun 2, 2010
271
0
0
Difference between them is that i dont feel like Valve is activly trying to rip me off....

unless you count TF2
 

michael87cn

New member
Jan 12, 2011
922
0
0
Valve are interested in making great video games. EA is interested in milking you dry.

Very different.
 

SirPlindington

New member
Jun 28, 2012
328
0
0
So... what was the point in the end? I'm confused. What are we supposed to be talking about again? The fact that you've revealed Gabe Newell's lycanthropy? We've all known, Gabe. It's time to come out of the closet, or rather the forest.
 

Brendan Stepladder

New member
May 21, 2012
641
0
0
Kasten said:
So much yes.

And another thing about EA is that they are cartoonishly evil. Valve are just irritatingly arrogant, it's the difference between Nero and Caesar.

I'll let ya'll figure which is which.
Toughy. One would think that Caesar's organized power and authority would lend him to being EA, while his immense popularity with his constituents would imply that he is Valve. Nero's general association with disorganization would lead people to compare him to the anarchic nature of Valve's development crew, but his self-destructive nature would hearken back the nature of EA's treatment of franchises.

So, no. I cannot see who is being compared to whom.