The second i saw Mojang AB in the finals. I took away this lists credibility card. C'mon Minecraft is good but theres no way its good enough to earn Mojang a spot in the finals.
Valve deserved to win because, whereas Mojand created an unfinished beta, Valve has created tons of amazing games with great gameplay/stories/characters/writing. I have clocked over 300 hours into TF2 alone. Valve is just the better company. Take Left 4 Dead for example. In the hands of another dev, it would be a standard greyish-brown zombie game with gruff one-dimensional characters (if it would even have characters), a 4-6 hour long campaign, paid DLC, one or two extra modes, and "mature" blood, swearing, and sex. Valve took what could have been that and gave it fleshed out chracters, mind-numbingly fun multiplayer, a reliance on teamwork and coordination, several campaigns lasting around an hour each (if you plow through it, multiplayer campaigns can take HOURS to complete), free dlc in the form of new campaigns, and new game modes that cycle through each week (mutations). take just about any of Valve's games and compare it to Minecraft, Valve will win.Kortney said:I'm curious as to why you think this. Is it opinion or do you think that in a more objective sense?BanthaFodder said:Valve deserves to win.
I'm just totally stumped as to how everyone is voting.
It's like legos in that you put blocks on blocks to make block structures, but the difference is that all the legos are in front of you. You do not have to spend hours upon hours getting a specific type of block by repeatedly clicking on another type of block. A 2x1 red lego is functionally equivalent to a 2x1 blue lego. Iron is not the same as gold and redstone is not sand.TiefBlau said:snip
Wow, where did that come from XD. The guy just said he doesn't think HALO is all that great, whats the big touchy subject here?Sober Thal said:Have you ever even played the Halo games? Your XBLA profile says no, so no need to call out a guy who likes them.Cobster said:Yeah but Halo isn't that great.Terminate421 said:I wish Bungie was on the Fearsome four......
Sheesh, you could be doing something better with your time, like playing Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's , or Modern Warfare® 2, no?
EDIT: Banana Is NOT Ok
No, you're really not.Freechoice said:You can go into Minecraft just to build, but if you are not interested in creative mode or have no idea how to access admin mode, you're in a skinner box.
Fanboys and anti-fanboys make the internet go round.Vampire cat said:Wow, where did that come from XD. The guy just said he doesn't think HALO is all that great, whats the big touchy subject here?Sober Thal said:Have you ever even played the Halo games? Your XBLA profile says no, so no need to call out a guy who likes them.Cobster said:Yeah but Halo isn't that great.Terminate421 said:I wish Bungie was on the Fearsome four......
Sheesh, you could be doing something better with your time, like playing Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's , or Modern Warfare® 2, no?
EDIT: Banana Is NOT Ok
Citing one characteristic does not make the larger part of it go away. Do most people do just the things you listed? I doubt that. Most of the videos I have seen of Minecraft show people digging underground and volcano doom fortresses with garden rooftops.Sixcess said:No, you're really not.
WoW is all about progressing along a clearly defined path, and the further along you go, the slower it gets, like most other MMOs. 1-10 will zip by. 11-20 will be slower and so on.
Minecraft has no path other than what you decide. The game does not force you to mine 10 gold, then 20 gold, then 50 gold, then 10 diamonds etc. In fact it's probably as far removed from progression driven gaming as you can get. Yeah, you can do that. Alternatively you can explore endlessly, build with common, readily available materials, or just make a bow and go hunt creepers.
Extra Credits is a great series, but people really need to stop throwing around concepts they've picked up from it without knowing what those concepts actually mean.