MaximumTacos said:
Angad: Please note that your account [maximumtacos@gmail.com] has been permanently terminated from the Electronic Arts Online service for violating the terms of services. The account will no longer be accessible in any way, and all property, items, and characters associated currently are or will soon be deleted.
Angad: Is there anything else I can do for you?
I posted the rest here as I don't want to be spamming the forums with it.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.323783-Questions-Still-Swirl-Around-EAs-Origin-Bans?page=4#13389462
What do you guys think about this?
The violation in question was someone making a post, cursing at me, with my username at the end of their rant. That's right. You just have to swear at someone now and EA's automatic filter does the rest.
Hmmm, well my first question would be what the guy was swearing at you for. Their database might only compile accusations under very general headings, so being put in the same catagory as swearing might actually be from player harassment or whatever that wasn't being recorded.
That said, my issue with this kind of thing is that there is no human review involved. I also admit to some concern over what is going to happen with "Old Republic Online" when the game finally launches given the generally rowdy behavior of people involved in MMOs.
As far as the guy suggesting they get taken to Small Claims Court, the problem with that is that first the courts have to agree to hear the case. Secondly if you lose a case like that you can get hit by the other guy's legal fees... and since you can't afford to hire a lawyer for a $50 payout, you'll be representing yourself against a legal representitive from a big company that is going to hit you with his fee. That's why companies don't get nickeled and dimed to death this way.
This is also why class action suits exist, when everyone gets together to hire a lawyer to represent the situation as one case, making the potential payout sufficient for the lawyer being hired to take a percentage of. It's harder for a big company to intimidate it's way out of, and it's also why a lot of EULAs are making people sign away their rights to a class action suit. Whether the EULA could stand there is questionable, but the bottom line few people are going to be able to hire a lawyer to fight that point.
-
Overall I can't fault what EA is doing, I mean we've all probably wished at one time that these companies get more hardcore with the banhammer... however an automated banhammer causes as many, or more problems than it solves. The issue is that EA doesn't want to spend the money to hire what amounts to their own police force, or put a human review system into play as it would cut into their profits unless they basically raised the prices of their games even more and pretty much slapped us all with the bill and people wouldn't stand for that. Basically EA isn't going to cut into it's hundreds of millions in profit for the sake of the customers. The idea is good, the implementation is ruined by greed.
I imagine this will come to a head with Old Republic Online.