EA has been a lot better than Activision in recent years, so I'll go with them. It has nothing to do with their games for me at this point, just how much of a dick they are.
EA publishes Valve's console games.Grabbin Keelz said:I choose secret option 3. Valve!
I would as well but I don't want to suffer death so I choose EA. It's because (like everyone else had said) the lesser of two evils.Grabbin Keelz said:I choose secret option 3. Valve!
Ok, I do admit that Bobby Kotick alone is enough to make me jump ship to EA. But yeah, so far the valid points brought up in the thread is making me lean more towards EA at this point.Ed130 said:EA; they have some really good development companies like Visceral and Bioware and are trying to be less evil than in the past.
Activision; while they have Blizzard and the juggernaut that is WOW they also have a buffoon known as Bobby Kotick as their CEO, a nasty habit of eating game companies and extracting IP's before firing most of the workers. And have started to go the Madden way of producing games (producing a IP every year with minimal changes)
In terms of who I would choose it's going to have to be EA. They are less of a dick than Activision (then again you will be hard pressed to find a company that is a bigger dick than Activision)
I think it was more in the past when they went on an acquiring spree of many smaller and very innovative publishers, and then forcing them to conform their products to more mainstream appeal, then giving impossible deadlines resulting in terrible and sometimes unplayable games. Anybody else around for the Ultima IX fiasco?Vault101 said:EA I dont see whats so bad about them? mabye somone could fill me in? plus they own alot of good IP like bioware and dead space