If you don't have time to respond to those videos, why would you have time to respond to any other laundry list?
because, quite frankly, unless you were to post a 50 page essay on the subject, it wouls still take considerably less time to consume than RLM's reviews. On top of that I don't particularly like his Star Wars reviews. They miss the mark on their criticisms far more often than they it them, and are straight up factually wrong on several issues (such as when he claims the federation blockade doesn't fire on the ship after artoo fixes the shields). When it coes to prequel criticism the "What if Episode I/II were good" videos are much better. Also i really hate the attitude some star wars fans have where they post RLM's videos as if they're some perfect criticism of the films, and ae completely irrefutable (once on this very forum I mentioned I enjoyed the prequels and someone responded to me by posting RLM's phantom menace review to "correct" me. The poster actually said it in those terms too).
Does it say that they went directly? I don't remember that. Additionally, the only indication they might know they're being tracked comes from Leia, which is while Han's celebrating.
Yes, Leia directly says "they're tracking us". Han doesn't believe her, but it still doesn't make much sense for leia to guide them directly back to the secret base when she knows they're being tracked
3. Why does the empire re-build a battle station that is shown can be destroyed by a single well-placed photon torpedo by a medium sized fighter?
Even the dark side has no power to match civil contractors.
But seriously, it's a new design. I'd also point out that the threat of a new Death Star brought out a massive fleet that would have been slaughtered if some of the most hated Muppets ever hadn't helped the rebellion. So basically, "bait" would conceivably be enough of an explanation.
Yeah, that one wasn't really a serious criticism. I should have made that more clear
4. What the hell is up with the space worm? What does it eat? How does it survive?
That's not really a plot hole.
I know it's not really a big deal, but I still don't think it makes much sense. You kind of have this giant, not particularly mobile creature just kind of sitting in a cave on an asteroid without easy access to food. I'd say that if criticism of the geology of naboo is valid, this should be too.
Except it isn't gone in the EU and I'm positive it won't be gone in the new trilogy, not to mention I seriously doubt Lucas had planned three trilogies only for the third to be completely devoid of the principle villain of the first two.
Lucas changed many things over the years, and while certain things from his original plan did end up in the prequels (the republic falling to politics and corruption rather than some sort of outside threat), many other things did not. On top of that, one of the things I actually agree with RLM on, is that you can't really bring in knowledge of the EU into discussions of the movies, because those things aren't in the film. We also know that prior to the sale of disney there weren't any intentions to make more star wars films after episode 3, so to me it seems a bit odd to be bringing in hypothetical films into this discussion. Even if the new movies have dark side force users in them (which they very probably will), the story just becomes that the prophecy was wrong, rather than the prophecy talking about anakin equalizing the number of light side and dark side force users,as by the end of the OT there is 1 Jedi and there are no Sith.