Ellen Page Nudity in Beyond: Two Souls Triggers Aggressive Sony Response

Recommended Videos

glider4

New member
Mar 27, 2012
38
0
0
OW EM GEE NUDITY!?!? Run for the hills this is horrible! OK I have no idea why this is controversial, It's just a video game model.
 

briankoontz

New member
May 17, 2010
656
0
0
shogunblade said:
Casual Shinji said:
Fuck that! Where's my Willem Dafoe nudity!?
Have you ever heard of a little film called Antichrist? [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0870984/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1] Just.... Throwing that out there, to fill your Dafoe nudity needs.
For those people who want to take it to a whole 'nother level, google "Channel J" - The Dance of the Sphinx & The Chimera.

Congratulations - You're now a Level 30 Defoe Nakedologist and the game is thankfully over.
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
Hmm, yes. Why would David Cage; a man who actively collected a plethora of photos from around the web of Ellen Page as a child and adult; insist that the character designers craft a fully-detailed, fully-nude model of Page's character if he had no intention on actually showing the character in full?

Hmm. Can't for the life of me think of why a man like Cage would do such a thing...

Seriously. The guy's either obsessed or a creeper. Or both. [http://kotaku.com/the-video-game-that-began-with-pictures-of-ellen-page-1440500148]

But hey, whatever. Quantic, Sony, and Cage brought this on themselves.

It's like company execs don't realize that modders, hackers, and the internet exist.
 

magicmonkeybars

Gullible Dolt
Nov 20, 2007
908
0
0
If I was going to put a shower scene into a game, I'd want my characters to be anatomically correct, even if I never intended for the player to see any nipples.

A more interesting question I'd like to ask is if we've bridged the uncanny valley ?
Is it real enough for this to be an invasion of Ellen Page's privacy by whoever made the images or is responsible for them being this detailed ?

I'm not convinced myself and I think this is all a giant overreaction and they should have just accepted it and moved on because this will never be purged from the internet.
We'll forget about it in about two weeks and not care but it'll always be out there, somewhere on the internet.
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
Apparently someone's never heard of the Streisand Effect.

Also yeah, why would you bother rendering all the naughty bits if you weren't going to show them anyway? Should have just made a "barbie doll" model with nothing on it.

Oh and why does anyone want to see a character model with Ellen Page's face on it so badly anyway? If I want to look at women's naughty bits, the internet is full of high quality video of actual women who would be more than happy for you to look at their naughty bits.

Pyrian said:
thaluikhain said:
Why would you render her bits if you aren't going to show them?
Probably stock model. Not really an excuse - this stuff always happens.
That only begs the question of why the stock model has the naughty bits on it. Unless you're making a game with a lot of nudity you don't need naughty bits on models that are going to be wearing clothing all the time.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
RicoADF said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
RicoADF said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Say it with me: Fair use, assholes.

Seriously, this is classic fair use, and Sony is breaking the law by issuing these takedown notices. Somebody needs to countersue. Now Sony may or may not be in trouble with Ellen Paige's lawyers for the model being, er, fully functional to begin with, but that has no bearing on what the consumers are doing.
Err how is this fair use? Someone has used a dev kit to open up the models that are contained on the game disc and rendered them from angles that the game didn't depict, this isn't fair use in any stretch of the imagination.
It's contained in the publicly released product. For all we know no dev kit was involved, just a modded console with some basic hex editing tools (read: modern day gameshark.) Sony could make an argument along the lines you're giving, but any judge who actually goes for it should be booted out of office for ignoring consumer protections (i.e., the law) in favor of corporate profits.

Edit: To put it in context, what Sony is doing here is like if Rockstar had tried to censor all information about the hot coffee mod, including sending takedown notices to sites hosting screenshots, instead of just admitting that they made a mistake by dummying out the code instead of removing it entirely. There's at least two points Sony could have nipped this in the bud (changing the texture for one that's about as anatomically correct as a barbie doll, or actually removing the debug mode, instead of just dummying it out), and they screwed up on both, and are now blaming the customers for their mistake.
Being contained on the disc does not give you the legal right to rip the file out and use it elsewhere, that's what copyright is protecting them against you doing. The model is not yours to do with as you see fit, regardless of weather a dev kit is needed or not. There is no consumer protection giving you the right to steal models from a game.
Actually, that's wrong. Copyright would allow you to do whatever you want with the contents of that disc, as long as it didn't involve distributing it... outside of certain exceptions, one of which is fair use, which a screenshot being used as these are being used falls under. What you're thinking of is the EULA, which is a piece of crap that corporate lawyers came up with in order to get around the consumer protections on copyright, which is pretty much totally invalid outside of the US, and only valid in certain states (and there only because the Supreme Court still hasn't spoken) inside of the US.
 

cefm

New member
Mar 26, 2010
380
0
0
So, Mr. Cage - can you clearly and accurately describe to the best of your ability what artistic value made the fully-nude 3-D modeling of the character necessary for a scene in which nudity was not intended to be shown?
 

saxman234

New member
Nov 23, 2011
93
0
0
magicmonkeybars said:
If I was going to put a shower scene into a game, I'd want my characters to be anatomically correct, even if I never intended for the player to see any nipples.

A more interesting question I'd like to ask is if we've bridged the uncanny valley ?
Is it real enough for this to be an invasion of Ellen Page's privacy by whoever made the images or is responsible for them being this detailed ?

I'm not convinced myself and I think this is all a giant overreaction and they should have just accepted it and moved on because this will never be purged from the internet.
We'll forget about it in about two weeks and not care but it'll always be out there, somewhere on the internet.
Personally, I think this is closer to a photoshop picture than a privacy issue. She has a right to be frustrated with this, but honestly, this is not her body, it is a video game model. Maybe a pretty realistic model, but still just a model. Any decent photoshop person can create a realistic photo by putting some actors head on a nude model. Truthfully, I don't know why we are modeling in game characters as actors at this point, but I guess everything has to be more like Hollywood where we need to use movie actors. Imagine in MGS5, they remake snakes character model to be based off of Keifer Sutherland.
 

freedash22

New member
Jun 7, 2013
84
0
0
I almost forgot, this is David Cage we are talking about, so to him this is not nudity.
But simply, a-collection-of-polygons-and-curved-surfaces-that-create-positive-emotion.

I wouldn't be surprised if people started labeling this as a good example of developers abusing actors and models by filling in the blanks they didn't say at the contract or paid for.
 

Kungfusam

New member
Jun 26, 2013
45
0
0
Its possible that the scene was always going to be in the game until Anita Frequency happend and Sony or David Cage decided they didn't want the shitstorm

Admittedly he is a bloody idiot and that probably is a bigger factor
 

kburns10

You Gots to Chill
Sep 10, 2012
276
0
0
Serious question: if you are a celebrity (especially a female), does this sort of press turn you off from providing your voice/likeness to a video game character? It's cool that so many celebrities are starting to get involved in the medium and (sometimes) delivering great voice acting. But if you're worried the developers might portray you in a way not originally agreed on, does that make people shy away from video games? It definitely doesn't help the case for games and gamers being mature (even though this is the developers fault not the consumers).
 

sth1729

New member
Jul 6, 2013
26
0
0
Sony will never come anywhere close to getting this to go away and are just gonna have to bite the bullet if they get sued for it, because they certainly have the right to do so. I think I would actually bet money on Cage telling them to model 'everything' after hearing how he became obsessed with Ellen Page
 

FilmDude89

New member
Jan 6, 2013
19
0
0
I'm sort of ashamed to admit that I googled the image in question.. My curiosity got the better of me again! It's nothing special to be honest but that's not the point anyways. I feel sorry for Ms. Page.. she's been getting a lot of mud thrown her way recently. Pretty much all from the Video game industry too. I hope these experiences don't sour her or any other celebrities opinion's on doing work for Video games. I can't say I'd blame them if it did though, to be perfectly honest.

Edit: I just realized now that by saying "it's nothing special" could cause unintended offence. I just meant that it just looks like a poorly done rendering of an otherwise very attractive young woman. That's all.
 

jake557

New member
May 30, 2008
105
0
0
I don't understand why this is a big deal. I don't see how the character being naked has any bearing on the voice actress playing her, besides the fact that they look similar. It'd be like Andy Serkis getting upset over whatever Weta digital may or may not have rendered under Gollum's loincloth.
 

Flamb3Nobunaga

New member
Mar 4, 2013
39
0
0
Oh, no! Breasts! We saw breasts! This is an outrage! Sony must be punished! We cannot be allowed to see what 50% of the f*cking world has. It's just unnatural and disgusting. /sarcasm
 

tangoprime

Renegade Interrupt
May 5, 2011
716
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
Fuck that! Where's my Willem Dafoe nudity!?
Go watch Antichrist, pretty sure it's still on netflix. Then sit in a corner and cry for a while. Then attempt to clean your brain with bleach AND ammonia*.

*don't actually do this, you'll die.
 

tangoprime

Renegade Interrupt
May 5, 2011
716
0
0
Credossuck said:
haha, oh ellen, dear ellen.
Please come back when you have ceased looking like a cloisterboy, i am not a catholic priest.
Literrally nothing to see there. . . . ellen.
Yeah, there's a fellow on reddit who keeps re-uploading the shots and linking. I went there. I saw. I was not impressed at all.
If there's any reason for Ellen Page to be upset about this, it's because that nude body, when seen in it's entirety, looks like Hank Hill with a-cups, I'd be upset too.
 

hazydawn

New member
Jan 11, 2013
237
0
0
Everyone who wants to see the pictures...
they are nothing special :p
Skyrim modded is more erotic than this >.<