For those people who want to take it to a whole 'nother level, google "Channel J" - The Dance of the Sphinx & The Chimera.shogunblade said:Have you ever heard of a little film called Antichrist? [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0870984/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1] Just.... Throwing that out there, to fill your Dafoe nudity needs.Casual Shinji said:Fuck that! Where's my Willem Dafoe nudity!?
That only begs the question of why the stock model has the naughty bits on it. Unless you're making a game with a lot of nudity you don't need naughty bits on models that are going to be wearing clothing all the time.Pyrian said:Probably stock model. Not really an excuse - this stuff always happens.thaluikhain said:Why would you render her bits if you aren't going to show them?
Actually, that's wrong. Copyright would allow you to do whatever you want with the contents of that disc, as long as it didn't involve distributing it... outside of certain exceptions, one of which is fair use, which a screenshot being used as these are being used falls under. What you're thinking of is the EULA, which is a piece of crap that corporate lawyers came up with in order to get around the consumer protections on copyright, which is pretty much totally invalid outside of the US, and only valid in certain states (and there only because the Supreme Court still hasn't spoken) inside of the US.RicoADF said:Being contained on the disc does not give you the legal right to rip the file out and use it elsewhere, that's what copyright is protecting them against you doing. The model is not yours to do with as you see fit, regardless of weather a dev kit is needed or not. There is no consumer protection giving you the right to steal models from a game.Owyn_Merrilin said:It's contained in the publicly released product. For all we know no dev kit was involved, just a modded console with some basic hex editing tools (read: modern day gameshark.) Sony could make an argument along the lines you're giving, but any judge who actually goes for it should be booted out of office for ignoring consumer protections (i.e., the law) in favor of corporate profits.RicoADF said:Err how is this fair use? Someone has used a dev kit to open up the models that are contained on the game disc and rendered them from angles that the game didn't depict, this isn't fair use in any stretch of the imagination.Owyn_Merrilin said:Say it with me: Fair use, assholes.
Seriously, this is classic fair use, and Sony is breaking the law by issuing these takedown notices. Somebody needs to countersue. Now Sony may or may not be in trouble with Ellen Paige's lawyers for the model being, er, fully functional to begin with, but that has no bearing on what the consumers are doing.
Edit: To put it in context, what Sony is doing here is like if Rockstar had tried to censor all information about the hot coffee mod, including sending takedown notices to sites hosting screenshots, instead of just admitting that they made a mistake by dummying out the code instead of removing it entirely. There's at least two points Sony could have nipped this in the bud (changing the texture for one that's about as anatomically correct as a barbie doll, or actually removing the debug mode, instead of just dummying it out), and they screwed up on both, and are now blaming the customers for their mistake.
Personally, I think this is closer to a photoshop picture than a privacy issue. She has a right to be frustrated with this, but honestly, this is not her body, it is a video game model. Maybe a pretty realistic model, but still just a model. Any decent photoshop person can create a realistic photo by putting some actors head on a nude model. Truthfully, I don't know why we are modeling in game characters as actors at this point, but I guess everything has to be more like Hollywood where we need to use movie actors. Imagine in MGS5, they remake snakes character model to be based off of Keifer Sutherland.magicmonkeybars said:If I was going to put a shower scene into a game, I'd want my characters to be anatomically correct, even if I never intended for the player to see any nipples.
A more interesting question I'd like to ask is if we've bridged the uncanny valley ?
Is it real enough for this to be an invasion of Ellen Page's privacy by whoever made the images or is responsible for them being this detailed ?
I'm not convinced myself and I think this is all a giant overreaction and they should have just accepted it and moved on because this will never be purged from the internet.
We'll forget about it in about two weeks and not care but it'll always be out there, somewhere on the internet.
Go watch Antichrist, pretty sure it's still on netflix. Then sit in a corner and cry for a while. Then attempt to clean your brain with bleach AND ammonia*.Casual Shinji said:Fuck that! Where's my Willem Dafoe nudity!?
Yeah, there's a fellow on reddit who keeps re-uploading the shots and linking. I went there. I saw. I was not impressed at all.Credossuck said:haha, oh ellen, dear ellen.
Please come back when you have ceased looking like a cloisterboy, i am not a catholic priest.
Literrally nothing to see there. . . . ellen.