I actually looked it up myself, and I'm not positive that there's nothing down below, because there's, like, three pictures, only two of which show breasts, and neither of which show the crotch from an angle you can be sure of. It's really something nobody would have known or cared about if Sony hadn't done this, minus the possibilities for the modding community if there's a way to get into that debug mode on a consumer console.RicoADF said:
Being contained on the disc does not give you the legal right to rip the file out and use it elsewhere, that's what copyright is protecting them against you doing. The model is not yours to do with as you see fit, regardless of weather a dev kit is needed or not. There is no consumer protection giving you the right to steal models from a game.Owyn_Merrilin said:
It's not that it is a 'sex in games' situation, I may have created a bit of misdirection with my typing of the worried FOX newscaster, but if anyone hears of Ellen Page raising Cain on this for any reason, it will still reflect on video games in a bad way, because we have people in the industry trying to elevate games in many ways, but then we have David Cage doing something like this, to wit, someone on FOX News will turn this into a thing about how 'Video Games are bad' AGAIN, and it won't look good for us. Nobody at FOX will look at games like the 'Stanley Parable' or anything else that may be artful and go 'It's just like movie directors and books are dirty, while others are thoughtful', They will lump all games again, and then we have to start the cycle All over again.wulf3n said:
They didn't need to help people exploit it, though.Ldude893 said:
It's not an issue of patching it out. People already have access. I doubt they just posted it directly to the internet with not intermediary.CriticalMiss said:
The descriptions said you follow her through like fifteen years of her life. I'd assume it comes from later.Gearhead mk2 said:
The big issue, evidently, is that this is content that wasn't supposed to exist. I mean, did anyone read the article?Niccolo said:
She should have expected the studio itself to make anatomically correct versions of her that were unnecessary to the final product but contained, obviously.an annoyed writer said:
Nothing she said really sounded "mad." She even qualified the statement by saying she should probably be flattered.04whim said:
I'm more jaded than anything about it, honestly. Cage has a history of putting nudity in his games, and I simply wasn't surprised about this showing up, since it sounds like something he, as a director, approves, whether the actors/actresses like it or not.Zachary Amaranth said:
Someone might have pointed this out already, but I felt like interjecting my knowlege of Mass Effect trivia for very little reason. That's exactly what they did for the romance scenes in ME1, in addition to tastful camera angles (nothing important showing). Although jury's out on whether that was to avoid this sort of thing, or just because they didn't wan't to bother making a fully detailed nude model for a 15 second scene (not to mention that it would have to be dynamic because Shepard's skin color can change). Either way, better option.thaluikhain said:
No, I thought I'd just comment on a story like a dipshit. Of course I read it. And since Quantic Dream didn't scan her naked body into the game without her consent, I don't see what the big deal is. Yes, there's possibly a 'no unauthorised nudity of me' clause in Ellen's contract, but the whole thing can only really be accessed with a developer console. Quantic Dream has a history of pulling this kind of crap, contractually bound to not do this or whatever, so honestly I find myself thinking "it's just some boobs, give it a week and we'll all be talking about something else."Zachary Amaranth said:
RicoADF said:
)
