Those damn Germans really are causing some problems today eh?Andalusa said:First thing... that second goal England should have had was waaaay over the line.
Other than that, fair play to the Germans.
Mind you, hasn't been a good day for us all round, Hamiltion coming second to Vettel in the F1 earlier today.
Indeed it doesn't. Both involved armed conflicts between Germany and England.dragon_of_red said:As my dad just put it. It's world war 2 / 1 al over again. I forget which war, Im sure it doesnt matter.
This is true, but don't forget Germany has to be less greedy and not try beating Russia in the same game.Assassin Xaero said:Germany, for two reasons:
1. I'm mostly German.
2. History tells us that Germany can own England's ass as long as America doesn't step in...
not weak, the weakest they've had in a long time, on paper the match should have been England's, but like I said, fair play to GermanyLOLCMONBRUH said:You can't be serious about them being a weak side. Ozil has shown just how willing he is to work for a goal, Shweinsteiger(sp?) is good, and they'd be even better with Ballack.tricky_tree said:Fair play to the Germans, I had written them off as the weakest German side in many years with only Klose and Podolski (both Polish by the way ;P) capable of doing damage. But they showed just how much difference it makes when players play as a team and not individuals. Terry was appauling today, Rooney should be banned for all World Cups since he is clearly useless. Best striker in the world and has let us down twice now? Go figure. The only saving grace is that in 4 years time, Terry, Gerrard, Lampard, Heskey, Defoe, Crouch etc will be past it, then we get some team players.
Right because untill America woke up from it's little nap, the Germans were at Brighton pier? Nah read a history book songoldsphinxx said:This is true, but don't forget Germany has to be less greedy and not try beating Russia in the same game.Assassin Xaero said:Germany, for two reasons:
1. I'm mostly German.
2. History tells us that Germany can own England's ass as long as America doesn't step in...
I know this is many hours later, but I can only imagine your dissapointment.TheZapper said:Looking forward to the game, really think that for once England have the edge.
True... Come on Germany, don't let me down!goldsphinxx said:This is true, but don't forget Germany has to be less greedy and not try beating Russia in the same game.Assassin Xaero said:Germany, for two reasons:
1. I'm mostly German.
2. History tells us that Germany can own England's ass as long as America doesn't step in...
Although the Germans hadn't succeeded in the Battle of Britain, they had trashed the navy, cities and some of the air force. Britain definitely wasn't going to succeed without Germany being retarded and attacking Russia. The U.S. tore up Japan, not so much Germany.tricky_tree said:Right because untill America woke up from it's little nap, the Germans were at Brighton pier? Nah read a history book songoldsphinxx said:This is true, but don't forget Germany has to be less greedy and not try beating Russia in the same game.Assassin Xaero said:Germany, for two reasons:
1. I'm mostly German.
2. History tells us that Germany can own England's ass as long as America doesn't step in...
Well, but it so happens that the paper was printed in England ;P.tricky_tree said:not weak, the weakest they've had in a long time, on paper the match should have been England's, but like I said, fair play to Germany
Why is Crouch on that list? Could contend with a few others (lampard played ok imo, and im really not one of his fans ¬¬) but crouch? The one who actually scores and serves a role in the team yet is never used and spends 3/4 of his time on the bench in favor of overhyped rooney? The guy who's proved he is definitly a team player by being happy to win the aerial balls and pass it to others so they get the glory?tricky_tree said:Terry, Gerrard, Lampard, Heskey, Defoe, Crouch etc will be past it, then we get some team players.