Lonewolfm16 said:
SckizoBoy said:
davidmc1158 said:
Actually, English is descended from German, not French. Different roots. The reason English is so messed up is that a few busybodies in the 1700s decided that English needed a standard set of grammar rules. Unfortunately, they chose the rules for French grammar to develop the English rules from, not the Germanic rules whic actually would have made sense given that English is Germanic in origin! /pedantic nitpicking
Actually, English is derived from both French and German (and more)... being ruled by Romans, Angles, Saxons, Normans, Scots, Dutch, Hanoverians... and Saxons once again rather does that to a language. It would be a fair point that English is a 'West Germanic' language at its core, but it's thoroughly infiltrated with Romance vocabulary and lingual conventions that it doesn't really make much of a difference. The thing is, you can't really say that English is 'descended from German' as that would depend on your definition of 'German'. Hochdeutsch as we know it has only been prevalent for about a hundred and fifty years in what we now know as Germany. Before that, vernacular, regional and colloquial German had as little bearing on Prussian German as Spanish did to French (similar, but by no means mutually intelligible). Directly, English is associated best with Frisian, Scots and (predictably) Middle English. Lingual evolution is best looked south (i.e. Latin/Greek) rather than east (i.e. the pre-cursors to Allemannic German and the various Low/High German dialects).
Oddly, in all of this, the Danes are left out, since Angeln (the ultimate root of the label 'English') is in modern-day lower-Schleswig! Yet Danish is obviously non-Anglo-Frisian, ironically.
Any idea why there is so little Danish influence on the English language? Considering there was a series of Danish kings of England I would expect significantly more. Then again they were invaded by the Danes former allies, the french-speaking Normans before they got too good a grip on it.
Just off the top of my head, I'd say it could be because there were just so many different Germanic dialects all arriving at the same time. Also, the vast majority of Germanic settlers were male. They took wives from the local population, so the children would have spoken a mish-mash of Brythonic/danish/saxon/anglo pidgins. Blend them all together and you get a generic germanic... thing.
Also, the thing about French is that it's also been heavily Germanicized compared to the other Romance languages: French and Germany are right next to each other, they spent a lot of time together, also, the Franks were Germans. For that reason, English is the most Romantic German language, and French is the most Germanic of the Romance Languages.
And as Davidmc and SckizoBoy pointed out, French and Latin both entered English twice: in the Roman and Norman conquests respectively (though Rome was before the Germanic conquest, and as such had very little impact), and again when the self loathing intellectuals became convinced that Romanticism was the best thing EVAR!
I'd be more interested to know why the Brythonic languages didn't have a bigger impact.