I apologize for calling you a troll. I think you might want to be more careful how you put your opinion across is all. For some reason, your comment about "limited mental capacity" really bothered me. I felt it was quite offensive, hence my rather too blunt response.ostro-whiskey said:Yeah, perhaps I did go alittle far in my condemntation, R. Ebert is certainly no brainless yokel. Had I known this prior I wouldnt have been so self righteous, but you can hardly call me a troll for simply stating my opinion. I do however, stand by the premise that the film is simply visual masturbation, had it been some unkown director without Camerons vision and cinematographic skill, I assure you the film would have been viewed as a shallow, cliched flop. The 3D certainly didnt hinder it either.CrispyMyth said:Troll.ostro-whiskey said:I generally agree with Movie Bob, but this is bs. This movie is just visual masturbation, I would prefer to spend my money on a flm that actually has depth, and can immerse me.
It should have been pointed out that this movie is designed to appeal to people with a limited mental capacity.
And yes, I am falling for your troll. I am hardly a person of "limited mental capacity" and I thoroughly enjoyed Avatar. Of course, you don't know me, and need not take my word for it that I am quite intelligent. Let me make a couple points however...
First, Roger Ebert has given Avatar 4 out of 4 stars and stated Cameron is "king of the world" again. I would like to see you call out Roger Ebert as someone of "limited mental capacity." Go ahead, try to do that. Back up your assertion with some kind of fact to that matter while you do it, though, or you just prove you're a pathetic troll.
Second, you obviously haven't seen the movie, how can you pretend to have anything of relevance to say about it? I will not ever take any criticism seriously when the individual hasn't even seen, read, or *been there* to actually know what they are talking about.
Your attempt at a jab is facile, and you should be ashamed to ever post here again.
I really think you need to see a movie before you make the kind of statement you did, however. I stick by that. You REALLY aren't seeing the movie in the trailers, trust me. The ending actually surprised me, and I am VERY rarely surprised by ANY movies anymore (it really bugs the hell out of my Daughter too, I am not allowed to talk while we watch rentals anymore).
I'll leave you with this thought: If Avatar doesn't succeed, do you think we'll be seeing much of this new 3D and mo-cap CGI? EVERYONE, even the ones that didn't review the movie positively as a whole, have said the technology is astounding, and it is. Frankly, I would really like to see this tech with even more of a fleshed out story and characters (I don't think the story for Avatar was bad, but it could have been better, certainly). For that reason, I think all movie lovers should see Avatar, and hope it succeeds.