Escape to the Movies: Jennifer's Body

Recommended Videos
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
I will pay someone lots of currency if they can please explain exactly why she:

a) Still exists
b) is famous (I would also like to know how she became famous in the first place - something unsavoury no doubt).
and c) is popular (I mean really, WHO likes her?).
 

GrandAm

New member
Aug 8, 2009
272
0
0
I finally saw this movie today.

We'll start with MF. Although she is sexy, I hated her in the Transformers Movies. I don't fault her solely for that. The scripted dialogue was bad, I have no respect for what the director brings from the actors in his movies, and her character literally served no purpose to the plot other than eye candy and obligitory romance subplot. The role got her noticed, but did start setting her up for people that like good acting to backlash.

I saw How To Lose Friends And Alienate People. She was in it. Her character was a rich, pampered, and sterotyped starlet. She didn't have much dialogue and as with Transformers they played up the eye candy aspect. They did make fun of the character archtype, but she again was stuck in a superficial role.

Now Jennifer's Body. I liked it. I went in a happy mood just wanting some entertainment. It is one of those horrer movies that poke fun of the genre. This type is indeed a subgenre to itself. It did well to that subgenre. The reason why is some dialogue and situations were well written. They also didn't beat a dead horror horse like vampires, government experiment gone wrong, or some dude with mommy issues gone slasher.

I liked that the lead characters were female. It is nice to change up from the grizzled guy that saves everybody but the horny or black characters that always seem to die first and often. It was also cool that they stayed feminine. In so many movies the chick that gets the job done (whatever the job may be) is always just mean towards the male characters and their roles in the film. Of course by the end of the movie she (usually for no reason) falls in love with the male lead. In this movie, sure Jennifer is mean but at least there is a reason; she is the popular girl in high school and a demon (usually the same thing in RL).

Overall I liked the movie compared to others in the horror class. They deviated from the standard formula enough to make it entertaining and not boring for me. Will it win an Oscar, no. But I had fun. They did have the archtypes but changed their situations enough to seem different.

The best acting came from Amanda Seyfried. I saw her in Mean Girls. She played a total ditz blonde and was funny. Here, I thought she was great and it was nice to see her show some range. I see her getting regular work with a wide range of roles in the future. They tried to nerd her up. She, to me seemed sweet in her nerdy garb. To see her go badarse was almost a shock and I credit her acting talent. She is earning my respect. The lesibian kiss she did was nice to watch, but unnecessary. Fun, but pointless to the plot. Maybe the producers wanted it to get the repressively horny males (like me) in the seats.

I agree with Bob on one point regarding the scripts dialogue. The actors are all playing teens. Some of the dialogue sounded like fully made up words and phrases the are not used in conversation or even blogging. Some of it sounded like the writer was hoping it would catch on and be used by others in blogs to validate her that somebody watched her movie. It did get annoying after a while.

Overall, I had fun.

Back to MF. In this movie, she did a good job. She showed more range in this. Don't get me wrong she was eye candied to death. But I think she actually had something to do beside serve Michael Bay's desire to have had sex with her before she turned 18. Based on this I think if she keeps taking acting lessons, learns/develops, and her agent gets her some roles that don't require her moneymaker; I will give her a shot to see if she is more than a hot chick in perpetual porn make up.

I am not a fan of hers. This is the first thing I have seen her in I liked. I hope she gets an indepth role for us to say "finally, I have a non-horny reason to watch her on screen." Maybe they could remake It's A Wonderful Life and let her play Donna Reed's part. If she can pull it off without shaking her moneymaker, great. If Mary Baily is handing out cash at her husband's savings and loan during depression era 1930s while wearing a corset french kissing one of the female tellers; she's done.
 

GrandAm

New member
Aug 8, 2009
272
0
0
grunth said:
oh my god thank you MEGON FOX IS NOT THAT HOT y do tons of guys think shes the perfect body shes ugly as fuck i think her face is creepy and dos anyone know if shes in the next tomerader film i herd somthing ind if she is in puting a gun to my head...... scrap that hers
For the record, I am more attracted to the other actress in the movie. Amanda Seyfried. I think she is every bit as beautiful as Fox. I like that not only can she be the "hot girl" (Mean Girls), but she can also dress up to the "nerdy girl" (this movie); something MF I don't think would ever do. As a guy I actually look at the individual woman to see if her physical attracivness just works for me. I am not as concerned with what Maxum or other such media outlets tell me. I tend to prefer brunettes, even bordering to the "goth" style of dark/dress. I like piercings beyond the earlobs, but not so much tatoos. I actually don't like Megan's tatoo's. I find them distracting. Where as a woman that has enough piercings to piss-off an airport security gaurd is cool. Just me.

To be honest after seeing MF for the last three years in essentially porn makeup it was nice to see her "uglied" in this movie in a few scenes.

I agree, MF is not "that" hot. She is hot for what/who she has. She has it for herself and only herself. What I am trying to say is that all women are beautiful (hot) in their own way. It is great that not all women are the same and I appreciate the differences. Because most media I have seen her in has a definate "porn" quality to her looks, she seems unrealistic in her appearance; the creepy you mentioned. Plus not all guys want chicks dressed up like porn stars. Since it is acceptable for women to dress it up (all us guys have are suits or blue jeans) it would be nice to see MF change her style around.

After seeing Fanboys, Kristen Bell is way hotter than MF in my opinion. If I ran across her and she said we should get married and have kids without knowing her an hour, I would. She so far has also been proven to me to be a better actress than Fox.
 

martianman

New member
Feb 14, 2008
34
0
0
Thank god, I thought I was the only one who doesn't find Megan Fox attractive(which, according to most of the people I have talked to, is apparently a sin).

Also, the 90's didn't suck. It had Spiderman and Batman in series that actually took themselves seriously, some seriously awesome video games such as Driver 2, Doom, Mario 64, Zelda Oot, and dozens more. Granted, it didn't have the greatest fashion sense, but neither did the 80's, and kids now certainly don't either.
 

Ericb

New member
Sep 26, 2006
368
0
0
cloudcover said:
Megan Fox may not be the cleverst but she is much hotter then Natalie Portman!
Hotness requires physical beauty. But charm requires intelligence.

Both of them have one. But one of them does not have both.
 

cloudcover

New member
Oct 28, 2009
21
0
0
Ericb said:
cloudcover said:
Megan Fox may not be the cleverst but she is much hotter then Natalie Portman!
Hotness requires physical beauty. But charm requires intelligence.

Both of them have one. But one of them does not have both.
Pseudo-intellectuals; trying to over think hotness debates since the birth of the internet...
 

Spoon1138

New member
Oct 12, 2009
29
0
0
Towards the very end of the review Movie Bob mentions a little film by the name of Ginger Snaps. You all should go see it.
I just finished watching it and loved every minute of it. I was looking into the film having read about it in one of those "500 horror movies you need to see" books and the review it gave for "Ginger" made it sound very intriguing. So I found it on Netflix and it was to the back of the line for AWHILE. Because catching up on Battlestar Galactica is a much much much much higher priority and it should be, as is Dexter, and Weeds (but only up to season 3. Continue on if you must but the show kind of loses direction after that and just meanders about).

But having caught up on a great many things the disc came in, and it warmed the tiny little shriveled heart of my inner horror nerd.

The synopsis courtesy-o-Netflix: "The teenage years prove especially difficult for sisters Brigitte (Emily Perkins) and Ginger (Katharine Isabelle), who have an unexplained fascination with Goth and death. On the night of Ginger's first period, she's bitten by a werewolf and quickly develops several new traits -- including an aggressive sexual appetite. But as Brigitte tries to reverse the transformation, she must also hide her sister's mounting victims"

So do yourselves a solid and check it out.
 

Gir1yG4m3r

New member
Dec 22, 2009
68
0
0
Mr. Bob,

Thank you so much for saying what needed to be said. I couldn't have put it better myself. :)
 

Tzatziki3301

New member
Aug 11, 2009
141
0
0
Frankydee said:
I'm wondering if there's anyone out there thick enough to think that this movie was going to be good in the least.
They are called 'Empire' and 'Total Film'

;)
 

willgreg123

New member
Aug 4, 2008
306
0
0
2:37
"A satan worshiping indie rock band..."
PAUSE

". . ."

REWIND
PLAY
"A satan worshiping indie rock band..."

PAUSE
REWIND
PLAY
"A satan worshiping indie rock band..."
REWIND
"A satan worshiping..."
REWIND
"A satan worshiping..."
REWIND
"indie rock band..."
"...No, really."

Sweet bubbling crap, that's so freakin' weak, like, even for this weak plot.
....nope, I still don't belive it. I gotta hear it again...

REWIND
PLAY
"A satan worshiping indie rock band..."
 

retrieved dawn

New member
Sep 16, 2009
2
0
0
i think bob brings up a fair point megan fox is an actress with no talent and only get screen time because of 11 and 12 year old boys go to her movies just to ogel her hor a about and hour and a half and then go home, lock them selves in there room and wack on off just before there tramatised mum walks in say dinners ready
 

finndor

New member
Oct 29, 2009
5
0
0
I do agree with your assessment of Miss Fox's acting talent, however I would like to point out she has been in at least one good film, in my opinion, how to lose friends and alienate people. The film is definitely not carried by her acting talent but her role is practically herself in real life, which works quite well. If she sticks to roles like that she might be able to make a few more good films.
 

zeratul123

New member
May 25, 2009
137
0
0
your so right i dont see what people see in megan fox she doesnt look as good as other people, but still great review
 

Orinon

New member
Jan 24, 2010
2,035
0
0
she's ok-ish I guess, Like sometimes I think she looks ok, but I change my mind later so she doesnt impress me