...And now we suddenly have an idea for more awesome movie.samaugsch said:I don't see why the apes had to use spears. If they're so smart, why don't they break into the gun stores and start using the guns in there? Heck, they could even have the gorillas use detachable miniguns. xDPunkRex said:I basically said that minutes after you. Im all for the Sci-fi aspects (I love fantasy and sci-fi) but spears, REALLY!? I hope Ceaser pulls some serious genocide, like a new strain of small pox.summerof2010 said:Simian super intelligence aside, is anyone else not just immediately turned off from this movie by the sheer implausibility of the entire thing? Not only is the science behind the Altimeters mega brain serum softer than a pedophile's dick in a retirement home, but as far as I can tell, the pinnacle of primate weaponry is a freaking spear. I mean, yeah, the local police force is going to be flabbergasted at first, and the city where they first strike is going to get steamrolled, but are you trying to tell me that by the end of this the entire might of the world's standing armies can't contend with a legion of monkeys maybe a few thousand strong? Because frankly, that's ape-shit bananas. Pun intended.
The DVD cover literally spoils the whole movie.Littaly said:I had no idea that the ending of Planet of the Apes was considered an OK spoiler. I had it spoiled a few months ago by a podcast when the trailer for this movie was released, which got me pretty annoyed but since then I've heard it both left and right from pretty much everywhere. I should probably give that original movie a watch...
Well there are a number of reason why a zombies uprising wouldn't make it.SonOfVoorhees said:No. A zombie kills and makes another zombie. It spreads. Or does a monkey killing a human in this film turn them into another monkey?monnes said:Yes, and all zombie movies are stupid because we would easily beat them before the infection has spread. Also the Harry potter movies are stupid because they didn't use guns. These sort of films are unrealistic, yes, but that's part of the charm. I'm betting most sci-fi films you like has inconsistencies with reality far greater than Rising of the Planet of the Apes.chunkeymonke said:I can't bring my self to watch this movie for 2 reasons
1. Its kind of stupid because theres about 7 billion humans and less than 1 million primates and it's not like he had access to like every jungle in shit so the idea as a whole is just dumb.
2. This isn't how the origional story went and i'm a massive nerd and dislike the massive story change
Plus you can put a monkey down by shooting them in any part of their body. A zombie its the head. Have to be realistic to the rules of the movie. Monkeys are monkeys. Zombies are zombies.
Maybe a film about Zombie Monkeys taking over the world? That would be awesome.
Bob, considering the recent movies of the past, oh, I dunno, 10 years "OMG X even killed the helicopter" seems like a really, really tired trope.MovieBob said:Rise of the Planet of the Apes
A great blend of drama, sci-fi and apes attacking helicopters.
Watch Video
We have nice things. Bob's perspective is perplexing. Ya wanna know what I thought this movie was about? a villian origin. Namely gorilla grodd. I don't know anything about his history but wouldn't have been a nice thing to hear a origin story about a super villian than a good guy for once? Hmph. You and bob. there is always nice things to have but there is also always nicer things we will never have. But that is all subjective.twilinova07 said:God Damn right. There is a reason you didn't reveal anything about the last act besides "they win."MovieBob said:The problem with movies today, in a nutshell - instead of approaching a ridiculous premise with "It seems highly unlikely that this could happen, therefore I'm interested to see how the film finds a (hopefully) creative solution to that unlikeliness;" you get "Why don't they just shoot them? The trailer isn't telling me exactly how, therefore it's stupid."
This is why we can't have nice things.
Doesn't anyone want to see their expectations turned around? To be surprised by a creative twist? What else are you people going to see? The smurfs? Captain America again?
I want nice things.
that is a nice idea bob, but then...MovieBob said:The problem with movies today, in a nutshell - instead of approaching a ridiculous premise with "It seems highly unlikely that this could happen, therefore I'm interested to see how the film finds a (hopefully) creative solution to that unlikeliness;" you get "Why don't they just shoot them? The trailer isn't telling me exactly how, therefore it's stupid."
This is why we can't have nice things.
and that is a fucking retarded explanation, especially since I would have had to spend 10-20 bucks to figure it out. Call me thick but I'd rather have a movie that makes a bit of rational sense on the trailer and has a moderate twist such as District 9, than have a huge hole in the plot they fill with a soft science apocalypse. This is not a monkey apocalypse then, its a virus apocalypse with monkeys jumping around flinging their poo...Mischlings said:The updated, more aggressive virus that is used to cure Alzheimer's (yes, it's a virus used as a cure, there's real science behind that) has bad side effects on humans. One of the lab assistants is killed and it's directly stated that it's because he was exposed to the virus. Therefore, wherever the apes become more intelligent, a deadly-for-humans virus follows.