In the one scene, yes. but he could've been in more of the movie.JourneyThroughHell said:He totally didn't, though. Arnie had a plethora of great lines in his scene and seemed a superior intelligence officer to Stallone.IronStorm9 said:The point that I am trying to make with that statement is that he wanted to be the star of the movie. Normally I'm not against that (Clint Eastwood did a very good job starring in his own movies) but when you don't give anyone besides yourself good lines, that crosses into author-self-insertion territory.
So, yeah, I don't get where you're coming from.
Oh hai Canadian Briton I didn't know it was youCanadian Briton said:HAI DOGGIE GOODBYEHubilub said:... O HAI MARKEkonk said:Hahaha, I did NAAAHT.Eicha said:Well, nobody saw THAT coming. NAAAAT.
[sub]I really hope you were meaning to make a The Room reference[/sub]
Because answering "Who sent you here?" with "Your mother" is a great line.IronStorm9 said:And the director, and the only one with good lines.Hubilub said:I don't agree with you on this. I think plenty of the actors got their moment to shine in the spot-light. Stallone is pretty obviously the most in it, but then again, he's the protagonist.
congrats, you found TV TropesJet Li got a lot of action (though not as much as Statham), and all characters got their Crowning moment of Awesome.
hmm lets see what fox says to do about this.... ok, first Im supposed to invade your county to make sure you dont take american jobs, then Im supposed to destroy your country so you cant destroy america then I have to declare freedom after your population is wiped out.... hmm that seems like alot of effort, think Ill play flash games insteadFargoDog said:No, I'm from a country that isn't the US. That's what makes me a terrorist, according to Fox.Worgen said:exactly, that makes you a terrorist, havent you been listening to fox?FargoDog said:Why? Because I'd rather make up my own mind than just listen to some movie-critic who I could completely disagree with, which I probably will in this case?Blue-State said:Traitor! >(FargoDog said:And yet I'm still going to see it.
I'm going to stop talking to you now.Hubilub said:Because answering "Who sent you here?" with "Your mother" is a great line.IronStorm9 said:And the director, and the only one with good lines.Hubilub said:I don't agree with you on this. I think plenty of the actors got their moment to shine in the spot-light. Stallone is pretty obviously the most in it, but then again, he's the protagonist.
congrats, you found TV TropesJet Li got a lot of action (though not as much as Statham), and all characters got their Crowning moment of Awesome.
I find it strange that your "It's a cash-in" argument is based on the fact that you think he got better lines.
Cut Austin?wildcard9 said:Ironically enough, we've got another throwback later on this year: a True Grit remake starring Jeff Bridges in the Duke's role and directed by the Cohen Brothers.
It's not so much the content as much as how the production and director uses it. The Expendables could've been a better film, but what I've heard from other critics (notably Spill.Com who took time to mention specific flaws), there was not enough time for each character and it came off as a bit diluted. If the director would've cut out a few of the less needed actors (Austin et all), maybe it would've been a fun throw back a la Grindhouse. But too many action stars who each demand equal time and you've got a mess.
Aww k'mon! Get serious please! If that happened, people would go see that movie in DROVES to figure why they hate it so much.EchetusXe said:Obviously the former, if it was the latter then he would be an idiot. If Obama, Nelson Mandela and the spirit of Gandhi came out and called a press conference to say this film sucked then it wouldn't have any impact on ticket sales. Marketing and word-of-mouth matter more than whatever the critics says.
Movie Bob's review betray me, I FED UP WITH THIS WORLD!!!!Hubilub said:Oh hai Canadian Briton I didn't know it was youCanadian Briton said:HAI DOGGIE GOODBYEHubilub said:... O HAI MARKEkonk said:Hahaha, I did NAAAHT.Eicha said:Well, nobody saw THAT coming. NAAAAT.
[sub]I really hope you were meaning to make a The Room reference[/sub]
We're not allowed to be offended at being outright insulted? That's nice.Charisma said:Yeah, I'm pretty sure anyone counter-raging is just offended at being called a sheep (indicating insecurity on the subject, of course).
Not going to win many arguments like this, are you?Charisma said:Man, what a bunch of wormy little cretins.
You're thinking of when the Catholic Church says a movie is blasphemous.Cocamaster said:Aww k'mon! Get serious please! If that happened, people would go see that movie in DROVES to figure why they hate it so much.EchetusXe said:Obviously the former, if it was the latter then he would be an idiot. If Obama, Nelson Mandela and the spirit of Gandhi came out and called a press conference to say this film sucked then it wouldn't have any impact on ticket sales. Marketing and word-of-mouth matter more than whatever the critics says.
Do you honestly believe that a movie endored by these people would NOT be affected in the box office?
C. Violence!Uber Waddles said:I honestly believe people only liked this movie because:
A. They have a horrible taste in movies. Some might see this as an opinion, but there wrong.
or
B. They liked the movie because of how saturated it was with action stars, which gave them a flash of nestalgia and "omg this is badass Jet Li + Stalone manly <3"
....
The Expendables failed to entertain; it had no "OH SHIT" moments, and bland action. It had no meaning, it was a bunch of retired action starts getting sweaty. It didnt teach us important life lessons. It only existed for nestalgia. And thats it. And it wasnt that good.
Its not about winning arguments its about maintaining the delusions that exist within his own head.JourneyThroughHell said:Not going to win many arguments like this, are you?Charisma said:Man, what a bunch of wormy little cretins.