Hubilub said:
I could barely finish watching this review. Took a lot of strength.
I can't believe Bob this week. We are obedient sheep because we go see one of the biggest collaboration films this decade instead of watching a film that was barely advertised in many places? We are the worst kind of people on earth because we like the premise that a movie will be an homage to 80s action films?
He dropped the ball on this review. Insulting a film is one thing, insulting someone for liking it is another, but insulting people for thinking the premise sounds like a fun idea?. That's a new low. I won't even go into how much I disagree with you on the quality of the film.
For someone who tries to hinder people from being elitist nerds, you are one of the biggest elitist nerds I've seen in quite a while.
Huh. I'm pretty sure he liked the premise (and listed a few examples of it done well, like Planet Terror). He's just pissed that's not what they did. It isn't a bad 1980's action movie remade in 2010; it's just a 2010 action movie that was made badly.
That's what I got out of it anyway. And I think he was insulting people who picked to see Expendables over Scott Pilgrim, rather than see Pilgrim (or saw both, which would have been perfectly acceptable). Basically, he's pissed that Pilgrim got slaughtered in the box office by this movie (which is, in his opinion, a lesser Rambo which was already a good 1980's jungle action flick remade with gore added).
But this is all guess work, since I'm not movieBob, and I can't peer into his mind.