Almost exactly what I mean by "contrary to our modern definition of society". Unlike my friend Imperator-Zor, however, I am willing to concede that some creative genius might just come up with working explanation of the Purge.Imperator-Zor said:You guys are talking of "wasted potential".
Seriously.
WHAT POTENTIAL WAS THERE TO WASTE?!
Lets be clear, The entirety of the movie is based around a really fucking STUPID idea. It ignores everything from history to sociology to economics. Leaving aside the people who would get killed or wounded in this situation due to violence (no easy task), it would end in billions of dollars of property damage. Manufacturing equipment, power lines, sewage treatment, infrastructure, vehicles, hospitals, schools. Tools used for economic activity and to support human life and comfort, which need to be replaced. As for money, you know what many people who had the money to do so would do to the US if "The Purge" was put into practice? LEAVE. They would buy tickets to Canada, Australia, the UK, the EU, Israel, South Africa, Japan and get citizenship there and take their money with them. Businesses would do the same as well as well. You know why you see "made in china" on so many things nowadays? Well partially it has to do with the Chinese workforce being willing to settle for lower wages. But many places in Africa often has even lower standards of living than China does. Now why don't big multinationals send as much work to Africa as they do to China? Many reasons, among them being education and infrastructure, but also big on that list is the fact that China is fairly stable and orderly and not wracked with constant fighting. If you own a factory, among the things you don't want to have happen is having it trashed by a bunch of machine gun wielding idiots having a fight. I also would not want to have to pay for the heavily armed rent-a-cops. If the purge happened and I owned a factory, I would pack it up and move it to a place were their was still rule of law. The purge would, in no uncertain terms, leave America bankrupt, impoverished and ravaged by violence and no amount of half assed "it's in our nature to be violent so we have to let it out" nonsense will make up for it.
Human civilization did not create laws for yuks. We have them and decided to (at least nominally and when we fail to do so, it is just that, a failure on the end of the executing individuals, not the principle, and negatively effects people) enforce them uniformly because they are useful tools to have. Honestly, you could make a better case that mandating that everyone wears must wear a T-shirt with a picture of a badger on it with violators being thrown in prison on it would decrease crime rate and improve the economy than saying the purge is a good idea.
Now some of you guys are going to say "willing suspension of disbelief", but no that does not stand up. I can buy that a ship could fly Faster than Light. There might be some secret of quantum physics out their that allows us to get around the Einsteinian speed limit in some manner or other. Radio 200 years ago would have sounded like magic as well. It's best if you don't talk about how your space opera's hyperspace works on a highly technical level about it's mechanical operation because they are in the end talking out of their ass. And despite that, it is usually used to serve the purpose of allowing humanity to operate on an interstellar level and is not an active insult to the intelligence of anyone who thinks logically about it for ten seconds.
Zor
That feel when you're complemented for being politeKeikakuKat said:Thanks for being so polite. I was totally expecting to get flamed.PoolCleaningRobot said:The premise of this movie sounds creepy as fuck. Too bad they completely wasted it. Though I do love listening to Bob rip a movie to shreds and talk about what it should have done
I think he was just in the lime light too much and we heard a lot his opinions and he just came to represent oblivious wealthy people. I agree with ya. I don't like him but its not personalKeikakuKat said:More hating on Mitt Romney. I don't even like the guy, so why do I feel the need to jump in on people bashing him? I'm just a weirdo like that, I guess.
Anyway, still a good review. I already wasn't going to see this movie, but at least now I know exactly what's wrong with it. Oh and hey, another Robocop fan! Yay!
I'm glad I'm not the only one, the whole "purge" idea sounds like something an 8 year old would come up with when asked how to solve the world's problems.KefkaCultist said:I've thought the premise of this movie was astonishingly retarded the moment I heard about it. Of course, most of my friends thought this movie sounded great and intelligent. I'm glad my opinions were founded. lol
Yeah, same here.bdcjacko said:The whole idea behind the movie makes me angry.
I was just checking, because your sarcastic statement is ambiguous in its intent. Either it was countering the notion that Sean Kay's enthusiasm was appropriate (bad) or it was saying that you are 'another one of the people who are not hype [sic] for Pacific Rim' (legitimate, but unnecessary). Then I questioned you about it and it turned out to be the latter; Schrödinger's box is now open and the cat is alive. Like I said, I was just checking.RJ Dalton said:After careful consideration, I have decided that, no, this is not what I'm implying. Nothing, in fact, is being *implied* at all. What is being *expressed* is well-earned cynicism about the film industry and its output. It's all quite out in the open, you'll notice.Farther than stars said:Are you implying that because you don't want to see it, the film as a whole should not exist for other people to enjoy?RJ Dalton said:Is that the one about the giant robots fighting monsters from under the sea? The one that looks like Evangelion, but with a burly, hard-boiled soldier for a protagonist instead of a wanker kid? Yeah, that's what I want to see, a live-action anime in which one set of cliche characters are replaced with a completely different set of cliche characters.Sean Kay said:Its a sad state of affairs that I can't even fault you for being that pessimistic really. Still, I think you're the only person I've seen this year who isn't hype for Pacific Rim
Just as it sounds, the girl of the family has a boyfriend that the father doesn't approve of. Naturally, he remains in the house for the Purge and loses any relevance after about 5 minutes.thehorror2 said:What's the "boyfriend subplot" that he mentions in the stinger? I haven't seen the movie and I have no desire to, but I'm curious what's going on with that.
Boyfriend shows up. Boyfriend wants approval. Boyfriend gets shot. Boyfriend dies.TrulyBritish said:Just as it sounds, the girl of the family has a boyfriend that the father doesn't approve of. Naturally, he remains in the house for the Purge and loses any relevance after about 5 minutes.thehorror2 said:What's the "boyfriend subplot" that he mentions in the stinger? I haven't seen the movie and I have no desire to, but I'm curious what's going on with that.
I'd advise you to spoiler that but I'm not sure there's really a point. If there's someone who can't spot the boyfriends intent after like his first ominous sentence I'd be surprised.ThunderCavalier said:Boyfriend shows up. Boyfriend wants approval. Boyfriend gets shot. Boyfriend dies.TrulyBritish said:Just as it sounds, the girl of the family has a boyfriend that the father doesn't approve of. Naturally, he remains in the house for the Purge and loses any relevance after about 5 minutes.thehorror2 said:What's the "boyfriend subplot" that he mentions in the stinger? I haven't seen the movie and I have no desire to, but I'm curious what's going on with that.
Best. Subplot. Ever.
Izanagi009 said:I think it can go further than the binge day thing. People contemplating their morality, riots and revolutions going on, the change in sciencedue to the incusion of forbidden research.