Nah, they know better than to cross the Cascades, too much green, not enough barren wasteland. Their eyes can't handle colors that aren't shades of brown and yellow.lokiduck said:
Every State in the USA goes to war with each other, who wins (you can't say your home state)
- Thread starter zombiejoe
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Who said they could win? They will just hold up in the east side of the Cascade Mountains until they are killed one by one, but not before bleeding the enemy with ever advance they make. That or they turn on the Western part and invade Canada. but then Oregon will come save us, because we're best friends with them.lokiduck said:
Alaska, It turn out to be like Russia, Go in too deep and get snowed out! plus they can cut off the oil supply 
California.
Why?
While all the other states try to kill each other, they're too high to realise what's going on. After the war ends and everybody kills each other they're the only ones left.
Why?
While all the other states try to kill each other, they're too high to realise what's going on. After the war ends and everybody kills each other they're the only ones left
.
i think it would come down to new york and calafornia. both have a high population with alot of money for stuff. Texas would become Neo-Mexico due to them running out of food and surendering in hope of food, then used as cheap laber for war profiteering mexician leaders. and canada would move south in a a facade of human aid, then instail a socialist leaders. (texas would start to try and fight but would run out of ammo) South carolina would die first, it low education staderds would cause them not to have any pilots or camando unites ( they need brains. flordia would join up with who ever thretend them the must ( i am thinking france) alaska would start a war with canada so that could fight receving medical care,and then would inbreed themn selves to nothingness. The weathest 5% would go to canada-great brittain-china-and india wo live like kings and start massing more money. Most "south" states would make a big show of how much they want to fight, but would never really fight because that would take energy away from inbreading. goegia would adopt the gay pride flag as its flag. Nevada is basicly a wastland with stripers, it would stay that way no matter what.
Okay i will stop now.What ever state would win out have to have a high poluation, midrange education, a willingness to negotiate; allainces and political standings as to not be fighting wars on more then 1 border. (texas you still losse badly).
Okay i will stop now.What ever state would win out have to have a high poluation, midrange education, a willingness to negotiate; allainces and political standings as to not be fighting wars on more then 1 border. (texas you still losse badly).
California, because all the girls there will just go shirtless and nobody will attack them back.
Ever.
(Except maybe the queers in Texas ;D)
Although I think my home state of Florida would put up a good fight (but not win), just because they're ALL wanna-be rednecks with guns and whatnot.
Ever.
(Except maybe the queers in Texas ;D)
Although I think my home state of Florida would put up a good fight (but not win), just because they're ALL wanna-be rednecks with guns and whatnot.
Totally Rhode Island. They hide the entire state population in a bomb bunker, wait 20 years and come out when everyone else has killed each other.
Similar to how mammals survived when the dinosaurs began to die out.
Similar to how mammals survived when the dinosaurs began to die out.
Lots of good points on this thread. I come up with a three-way tie between Texas, Alaska, and Hawaii.
Texas has guns and an easy defense position, Alaska has nukes and a standing army, and Hawaii has a standing naval force.
They could all join forces. Hawaii invades California who can't defend itself from the coast, Texas spreads out east and west, and Alaska bombs anything that doesn't cooperate. It would totally work.
Texas has guns and an easy defense position, Alaska has nukes and a standing army, and Hawaii has a standing naval force.
They could all join forces. Hawaii invades California who can't defend itself from the coast, Texas spreads out east and west, and Alaska bombs anything that doesn't cooperate. It would totally work.
Kansas has the Big Red 1 and is brimming with nuclear missiles, but that is my home state.
Missouri. The mafia there can destroy anything it wants to.
Missouri. The mafia there can destroy anything it wants to.
South Carolina also has a navy. As does Virginia and a number of other states. Hawaii lacks an industrial and population base necessary to win a war and the natural supply lines are far too long anyhow.Father Time said:
If we assume that the military assets normally stationed in the state will be used by said state, the obvious choice is Texas. Since I cannot vote for Texas being a resident of Texas, my vote goes to Georgia which hosts a shocking number of military bases and could field tens of thousands of federal troops and shocking numbers of aircraft of all stripes. It is certainly superior in this regard to most of it's neighbors with SC being home mostly to training units and relatively minor naval assets, NC being notably home to the 82nd Airborne Division (light infantry < mechanized infantry), Florida is notable for the special operations units on hand and Mississippi and Tennessee have few notable assets to call on.
Let's assume for a moment that the cause of the war is that the USA fractured into 50 independent states and each state is now imperialistically attempting to conquer the others.
First of all, nuclear weapons wouldn't be an option. The only reason for the 48 contiguous states to go to war would be to conquer, and nobody wants to conquer a nuclear wasteland. Plus, since quite a few states have nuclear arms and the means to launch them, a single nuclear attack would result in a nuclear war, in which no one would win.
So, with nukes out of the question and conquest in mind, the obvious victor would be Texas. It has a large population for conscription, and its huge landmass combined with well-armed civilians would make invasion extremely difficult. It has tons of oil and raw materials, as well as plenty of farmland and ranches for food production. It also has several Navy bases, giving it a big advantage over smaller and landlocked states.
However, the trump card up Texas' sleeve would be Mexico. Due to the shared border, Texas could not only easily trade with Mexico and other South American nations for everything it needs, but it could almost certainly depend upon it for military support. You see, the reason large wars break out so often on continents that share several small independent states is that everyone fears imperialistic expansion as it nears their borders. Mexico would certainly not like the idea of Texas being invaded and conquered by an imperialistic state.
So Texas would have a large army and navy, an uninvadable homeland, plenty of food, weapons and ammunition, oil, trading partners and military support from a nearby neighbour. It doesn't look good for other states.
First of all, nuclear weapons wouldn't be an option. The only reason for the 48 contiguous states to go to war would be to conquer, and nobody wants to conquer a nuclear wasteland. Plus, since quite a few states have nuclear arms and the means to launch them, a single nuclear attack would result in a nuclear war, in which no one would win.
So, with nukes out of the question and conquest in mind, the obvious victor would be Texas. It has a large population for conscription, and its huge landmass combined with well-armed civilians would make invasion extremely difficult. It has tons of oil and raw materials, as well as plenty of farmland and ranches for food production. It also has several Navy bases, giving it a big advantage over smaller and landlocked states.
However, the trump card up Texas' sleeve would be Mexico. Due to the shared border, Texas could not only easily trade with Mexico and other South American nations for everything it needs, but it could almost certainly depend upon it for military support. You see, the reason large wars break out so often on continents that share several small independent states is that everyone fears imperialistic expansion as it nears their borders. Mexico would certainly not like the idea of Texas being invaded and conquered by an imperialistic state.
So Texas would have a large army and navy, an uninvadable homeland, plenty of food, weapons and ammunition, oil, trading partners and military support from a nearby neighbour. It doesn't look good for other states.
Alaska. Something tells me they have the highest percentage of folks who know how to use a gun AND have basic survival instincts. Plus, as long as they don't leave the state, I have a feeling everyone else would be too lazy to try and get up there to fight them. And even if they did, they'd have to come on the ground because it would be too easy for them to shoot down the planes as they flew in.
And even if they came in on land, the Alaskans would just have to make sure they get stranded and wait until they either freeze or surrender--whichever comes first.
And even if they came in on land, the Alaskans would just have to make sure they get stranded and wait until they either freeze or surrender--whichever comes first.
Living in Missouri, I can say that we are fucked. I'd probably say Texas just because of all the rednecks.
Hawaii because the others will create a nuclear wasteland. (Alaska will survive the nuclear warfare, but Hawaii has better military i think.)
Or Texas if nukes weren't used.
Or Texas if nukes weren't used.