Okay, there's been a whole lot of posts since I was last here. There's no way I can address each and every one, so I'll cover a few of the topics that popped up multiple times (I read each of your posts though!)
Anime as the medium of animation/giving anime a special title separate from other animation
Okay, if you were paying attention, I said multiple times that "anime" is simply animation, just like any other. When I talked about anime as a "medium" I didn't mean that there was a medium called "anime", I was trying to imply it's simply part of the medium of "animation", which means it can look or be about whatever the creators what. If you'd read the second half, I think the idea that people try to classify "anime" and "American Animation" as two completely separate things is foolish.
Why I define "anime" the way that I did
Think about this for a moment: what terms are you suppose to use to define what is "anime? If you're Japanese, you'd use this word to refer to ALL animation, regardless of country of origin, but shut up!
Do you use the visual aesthetic of a show as an indicator? So, wouldn't that mean that American shows like
Avatar and
The Boondocks would be classed as "anime" under this definition? Granted, some people might agree with this, but for a lot of fans, they wouldn't.
Okay, so do we use country of origin as an indicator? Well no, since Japan has produced animation for American studios in past (they've worked on
Animaniacs and
Cinderella to name two), this definition would mean these are "anime" by that definition, and I think most people would agree that they're not.
The tidiest solution? "animation from Japan, made for a Japanese audience" That covers both the previously mentioned problems. It's not perfect, but it will have to do. That's not something I made up, by the way, that's the definition they go by on the aniDB. Another good definition they use? "If something is encouraging me to masturbate, and is giving me the time in which to do so, THEN it's pornography".
The sexualization of young girls in anime
Okay, the first thing you got to understand is, that in Japan the age of consent is 14. So any sexualization of girls as young as 14 is perfectly legal, at least in Japan. So if the character in question is 14 or slightly above, the problem them becomes a cultural one, since the age of consent is 18 in the States (and 16 here in Australia).
But if you're talking about sexualization of girls younger than 14... Well, that is becoming a bit of a problem. I know what you're talking about, where a character is designed to look like she's 12 years old, but they say she's actually not. The creators then sexualize the hell out of her because they want make lolicon stuff and get away with it. This is a real problem that the Japanese governor is taking steps to try and solve. But for the fan, the answer is simple: don't watch the sort of shows that would try and pull the "legal loli" trick.
What Hanna-Barbara did in the 60s to tarnish the image of animation in the public's eyes
Okay, it's been while since I read the book that had this information, so this is off the top of my head.
Let me set the scene for you. It's the 1960s, and Hanna-Barbara has just perfected the technique of "limited animation", animation which gives you a good-looking result, but is VASTLY cheaper to produce than traditional animation thanks to a lot of clever shortcuts, such as animating a character's walk cycle once, then continually re-using it. (modern anime uses a lot of these techniques as a point of trivia). At the same time, politicians have cracked down on the content of television programming, animation like what Tex Avery become famous for in the 40s was a big no-no. So, we've got a situation where an animation studio now has the ability to pump out animation cheaply and quickly, but it must be family-friendly. You can see where this going. Hanna-Barbara flooded TV with animation aimed at children, which for the generation who grew up with them forever changed their opinion of animation as "stuff for children"
Eternal Taros said:
FireAza said:
Wow dude.
Words cannot describe the smugness and the vanity with which you so comprehensively managed to write about nothing for several paragraphs, defeating imaginary demographics that don't exist.
Way to go.
The first thing that you did wrong was assume that every holds the points of views you addressed.
Major fucking spoiler ahead.
I haven't met anyone who claims that all anime is X. Ever. It doesn't happen.
Nobody is that stupid.
What's even sadder is that you seem to believe that you require
FireAza said:
A combination of close to 10 years of watching anime, over 440 different series, and having lived in Japan.
in order to state the obvious.
And finally, you discuss how everyone is wrong about believing that anime is better than western animation.
What.
That's purely opinion based.
No there isn't any
physical barrier to good western animation.
No one is saying that animation made on Japanese soil is somehow inherently superior to western animation by virtue of being Japanese.
What's surprising is that you think this realization is some kind of an accomplishment.
What the people you are talking about are saying, is that they generally prefer animation made in Japan to its western counterparts.
I would be inclined to agree with those people you target in the latter part of your tirade.
Say what you like about anime, but the truth is, anime addresses more mature themes than western animations, which tend towards stupid slapstick or preschool material.
No one is saying that these ideas are
absolute.
They're just trends and tendencies.
Everyone realizes this.
What you must realize is that when one medium (or genre or whatever the fuck you want to call it, its just semantics) produces good material, we tend to look at that same medium for much of the same.
Please stop congratulating yourself for stating the obvious.
Chill out dude! The arrogant attitude I wrote my OP in? Done for humour and to be attention-grabbing. I take it you don't like The Jimquision either because the guy is such an arrogant prick?