Evolve Will Have Lots of DLC

Recommended Videos

Rozalia1

New member
Mar 1, 2014
1,095
0
0
Strazdas said:
What we used to call expansions are now sequels
I can take issue with a lot you say, but I'm just going to home in on this.
You seem to wearing some glasses that obscure your vision. The industry didn't suddenly start making shoddy quick sequels, that has pretty much always been a thing, as has bad ports, and many other ills that are apparently new.

Hyper Ultra Street fighter Championship tournament HD dual-shock thunder special edition remix if you get what that is referring to should clue you in that such practices have always been a thing, they merely can deliver them in a more efficient manner is all.
 

Riff Moonraker

New member
Mar 18, 2010
944
0
0
Strazdas said:
game has been specifically built to accommodate DLC.
so moneygrubbing by design.

ut we really didn't have a structure there to make new characters or zombie types, so we were pretty limited on what we could do, DLC-wise
translation: expect "2 new zombie skins for 5 dollars" DLCs

make new maps, new environment types, new wildlife, new monsters and hunters, and all of that stuff just plugs into the game."
Yes, we call them updates.

Then again, Rock turtle is rock turtle.

This is how trans simulator DLC looked during steam sale and what you can expect from statements like this




Trishbot said:
So many companies once had a policy of "free DLC" because they felt it was important to the fans to serve them first rather than corporate money lords.
No free DLC policy, but rather they used to name it differently.
What we used to call expansions are now sequels
What we used to call DLC are now expansions
What we used to call free patches are now sold as DLC
what we used to call bugfixes are now called patches.


Gundam GP01 said:
I dont think they're going to be that bad. Remember, this is the guys that made the Left 4 Dead games. All of the DLC for those were free and was automatically added via updates.
and they have said they do not like that and wanted to do things differently now.
Not to be a stickler, but there must be some other items missing from the picture, as I totaled those items up to be $271.28, not $1200 plus.... Still bad, still ridiculous, dont get me wrong... I am just supposing there was some other things offscreen that were added to that as well?
 

Elfgore

Your friendly local nihilist
Legacy
Dec 6, 2010
5,655
24
13
Pandalisk said:
How many monsters are they planning to release from the get go anyway? Just the two or what?
They say there will be five playable monsters and I think like seventeen hunters on release.

I don't very much care for this idea. DLC doesn't bother me, but a game made for DLC does. I was going to buy this day one, but I don't see that happening anymore. Unless I get more details.
 

youji itami

New member
Jun 1, 2014
231
0
0
Evolve is being published bye Take Two so excessive DLC was always surely expected just look at Borderlands 2.
 

Ed130 The Vanguard

(Insert witty quote here)
Sep 10, 2008
3,782
0
0
Riff Moonraker said:
Not to be a stickler, but there must be some other items missing from the picture, as I totaled those items up to be $271.28, not $1200 plus.... Still bad, still ridiculous, dont get me wrong... I am just supposing there was some other things offscreen that were added to that as well?
That game is Train Simulator 2014 and yes, there are over 170 pieces of DLC for it.

http://store.steampowered.com/app/24010/

Currently all of it will set you back at least $3000 USD.
 

Riff Moonraker

New member
Mar 18, 2010
944
0
0
Efrit_ said:
See, this is the dlc we should oppose, not what creative assembly is doing with alien: isolation. These people here are unashamed and willing to cut away their game, right infront of gamers, to make more money.
On the main topic, its going to continue to happen, so long as people buy it. In fact, this is actually going to get ALOT worse, now, that this seems to be the new "battlefront" between the consoles.

I completely agree about the Alien: Isolation dlc. I dont get what people are complaining about, and this game was already my most looked forward to, and even more so now with an actual trip back to the Nostromo. All you have to do is preorder the game, and you get it free. Folks need to pick their fights, and that one isnt one of them.
 

Riff Moonraker

New member
Mar 18, 2010
944
0
0
Ed130 The Vanguard said:
Riff Moonraker said:
Not to be a stickler, but there must be some other items missing from the picture, as I totaled those items up to be $271.28, not $1200 plus.... Still bad, still ridiculous, dont get me wrong... I am just supposing there was some other things offscreen that were added to that as well?
That game is Train Simulator 2014 and yes, there are over 170 pieces of DLC for it.

http://store.steampowered.com/app/24010/

Currently all of it will set you back at least $3000 USD.
Good lord. That is just insane.
 

gamegod25

New member
Jul 10, 2008
863
0
0
*sigh* and so it begins....here's hoping for the best but preparing for the worst v.v

Trishbot said:
So many companies once had a policy of "free DLC" because they felt it was important to the fans to serve them first rather than corporate money lords. DICE, Bungie, Epic... one by one, their staunch promises of free DLC shrived up and died out as dollars were waved in their faces and their integrity eventually found that sweet selling point.

Well, I hope the DLC is good. But more and more this shift has just taught me to NOT buy games at launch and to wait for the inevitable bundled "GOTY" editions for half the price.
Free DLC is always nice but I don't demand that they give it away or blame them asking for something in return for quality content. The problem is it's far to easy for them to abuse it. Its also hard these days not to assume the worst intentions because, let's face it, there have been plenty of bad examples. Its even harder to remain optimistic when they flat out state it was made with DLC in mind, that just screams "we're gonna milk dis s***!" which can kill what could have been a promising game. Personally I had no plans to buy it right away and just going to wait and see.
 

L. Declis

New member
Apr 19, 2012
861
0
0
CpT_x_Killsteal said:
This was gonna be my first pre-order in several years too, but now I can safely say "Fuck that" and wait a couple months until after it comes out. I was looking forward to this so much as well. The only thing that could bring me back around is if the "DLC" they release is cheap as chips and actually has some substance and isn't the equivalent of "Horse Armour".
Same. This went from 'considering a pre-order' to 'gonna wait a few months and see what happens.'
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,531
0
0
DLC practices can go diaf.

I never liked Left 4 Dead anyway and since this is pretty much almost the same thing but with prettier graphics I will be passing on this game.

It's not like I have 3 friends around that I could play this with (and they would even games of this type) so there's that as well.
 

El Luck

New member
Jul 22, 2011
312
0
0
The way they explain it really makes me feel a bit concerned about this. If they really are listening to the community hopefully they tell them just to sell cosmetic packs as DLC and the rest comes with updates, otherwise I can see this getting a bit ridiculous.
 

Battenberg

Browncoat
Aug 16, 2012
550
0
0
People are getting all riled up by this right off the bat and swearing off buying the game altogether. What if the core game is excellent and well worth £40, are you really not going to bother because there's also a load of optional DLC to buy?

I'm not a massive fan of this trend but at least you get a choice over what's worth your cash as opposed to, for example, a monthly subscription. It makes a lot more sense to judge the game itself by its own merits and keep the dlc as a separate consideration since it's a seoerate purchase.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Halyah said:
Vault101 said:
I wish this game was more "borderlands" than "left 4 dead" I like to have a clear endgame
Isn't this a multiplayer only game though? It's the impression I've been getting at least so I'm not sure what sort of endgame it could really have.
well left 4 dead was pretty much multiplayer except if you wanted you could play with bots (though that was missing the point)

Borderlands 2 you could go either way, I found it just as enjoyable to play with somone or alone (only downside is it will burn you out faster)
 

Cecilo

New member
Nov 18, 2011
330
0
0
Yaknow what this reminds me of? Not Left 4 Dead. No it reminds me of a mod from Warcraft 3. Called Parasite. It is kind of a shame that they are gonna nickle and dime you for all of the content since it was looking kind of interesting since Interest died out in Parasite when SC2 popped up.
 

Flammablezeus

New member
Dec 19, 2013
408
0
0
So, basically everybody interested in Evolve should just put off buying it until we get the inevitable "GotY" version with all of the content for cheaper than the release price?