Fallout 3 or Borderlands?

Recommended Videos

badgersprite

[--SYSTEM ERROR--]
Sep 22, 2009
3,820
0
0
They're two completely different games, really. Borderlands really seems to stop being enjoyable after a while if you approach it with a Fallout 3 mentality and don't play with friends; I get the feeling that it really wasn't designed to be played by one person. Fallout 3, by contrast, really satiates the inner-narcissist by making it all about you! (Albeit in a rather unusual way...)
 

Brad Shepard

New member
Sep 9, 2009
4,393
0
0
cyber_andyy said:
I've been thinking about Fallout 3 for a while. But then along came borderlands, and now I'm stuck.

I'm not a huge fan of mmos, and Torchlight and Diablo are the only good experiences I've had with RPG's. So I was wondering which one is easier to ease into the whole genre, and generally which one is better value for money?
I would go with Fallout 3 game of the year, all dlc, plus awesome gameplay

Borderlands is fun too, but no where near fallout.
 

Spiner909

New member
Dec 3, 2009
1,699
0
0
Borderlands. Fallout 3 was excellent, but Borderlands has multiplayer and more intense combat.
It depends if you want to buy DLC and if you have LIVE or not.
 

UltimatheChosen

New member
Mar 6, 2009
1,007
0
0
It really depends.

If you prefer the shooter aspect, go for Borderlands. If you prefer the RPG aspect, go for Fallout 3. They both have significant elements of the other type, but those are the main focus for each.
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
Sadly, I've not played Fallout 3, but I have been flat-out addicted to Borderlands for the past month. I've beat the game multiple times now, and I'm still playing it and enjoying it. MOST games for me, I just play for a little while and then drop when something else comes along that is shinier.

I will be the first to admit, as much as I LOVE Borderlands, it does feel kinda hollow, because there is little character development or story. Ultimately, that hasn't mattered too much though because I just have a BLAST when I'm playing it. I will just repeat what everyone else has said: get Fallout if you want a good RPG experience, or get Borderlands if you want a good FPS experience.

I still would lean towards Borderlands at this time regardless because I know that the devs didn't think the game would do awesome, and so it needs a little more attention. Fallout's time has come and gone, and I doubt that Bethesda is paying much attention to the sales numbers of Fallout anymore. It will be only a matter of time before Fallout 4 comes out, but who knows if we will see a Borderlands 2 (I'm really hoping it gets made).
 

Johnnyallstar

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,928
0
0
Fallout 3 for story, Borderlands for multiplayer and all around gameplay, though VATS is pretty fun.
 

gu3st

New member
Nov 19, 2009
1
0
0
I enjoyed both and have played both tediously. I've beaten every quest in Fallout 3 on 2 characters + DLC, Full trophies + Platinum.

In Borderlands, I'm about 1/3'rd through my second playthrough. My First playthrough I beat every quest + DLC, and my second one I'm working on. Not quite level 50 (level 47) and all but the Level 50 trophy + Platinum.

They're essentially polar opposites of the same game concepts. Fallout is an RPG with some FPS elements, whereas Borderlands is an FPS with some RPG elements.

Both are fun, Both IMO have an enjoyable story, Fun gameplay (although polar opposites again, Fallout is more slow-paced and requires lots of thought, whereas Borderlands is faster paced, and can mostly be just played with little planning of stats).

Really, it boils down to:

Do you want to play an FPS with RPG elements or an RPG with FPS elements?

The former, choose Borderlands; the latter, choose Fallout 3. Either way, (or with both!) you'll enjoy yourself.

@Signa: Gearbox has confirmed that they intend to make Borderlands into a few sequels, with more DLC as well. Additionally, Fallout: New Vegas (as well as alledgedly by Interplay a Fallout MMORPG) are in development. New Vegas will use the Fallout 3 engine, and is done by a different studio (with some of the original Fallout team on it), and the Fallout MMORPG (Project V13 I think?) is being done by more of the original Fallout team.
 

Jekken6

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,285
0
0
I got fallout 3 last year, so the obvious choice for me this year was Borderlands. However, both games are fantastic, but get Fallout 3 GOTY first. Lots of hours there. Maybe get Borderlands when it's cheaper.
 

Belvadier

New member
May 17, 2009
240
0
0
Borderlands is more "fun" while Fallout 3 is a "better game" if that makes sense. Borderlands is much more fast-paced and twitchy while Fallout 3 is contemplative and more tactical. Also, Fallout's story is more involved and it is a much more open world.

All said, both games are terrific and both warrant your purchase.
 

CLEVERSLEAZOID

New member
Mar 4, 2009
351
0
0
Wutaiflea said:
I had to get in on this.

I'm primarily an RPG fan, and I enjoyed Oblivion (for all its many frustrations) by Bethesda, so my husband talked me into trying Fallout 3.

Last night I became so monumentally pissed off with the slow character development and trudging back and forth through confusing terrain that I decided not to go back to it.
I despised the combat. I'm shit at shooting games as it is, without being blighted by lack of ammo and areas around your early quests filled with enemies you can't even begin to imagine killing until you're level 200.
Particularly on this subject, salt was rubbed in the wound by seeing my husband merrily running around one-shotting everything in sight on his game, because he'd levelled up a bit higher- in other words, the game is merciless to new players, especially those of us who don't usually play anything shooty.
The combat in Fallout can be merciless, but its all about the first couple of characters. You can quickly learn what works and what doesn't. Melee for example is a big no-no, but your not going to get far using guns unless you have a nice Small Guns skill and Repair skill value. And get the Scrounger Perk and ammo problems become very few and far between. Apart from Mini-Nukes. Oh lord I wish I could get a stupidly large amount of Mini-Nukes without having to camp outside Flak and Shrapnel's for 3 game days. And the map system is fine o_O I found myself checking Borderland's map screen a lot more than I did on Fallout. [For actual guidance on where to go, not to figure out if I'm still heading in the right direction]

I've invested well over 300 hours into Fallout since it's release, so maybe my comments are biased. I also own Borderlands, I've completed it once and am on a 2nd Playthrough [merely for the level 50 achievement] I've also mucked about a few times online with a friend. Borderlands boss fights were so-so [I preferred the early bosses tbh] the landscape DID give me a very post-apocalyptica feel [even my father, who is a casual gamer, asked me if I was playing Fallout when I was actually on Borderlands] It's also quite a funny game, some of the characters have BRILLIANT accents and one-liners ["Lucky is my friend! And when I say friend, I mean asshole who busted up my momma's girly parts!" and I also occasionally find myself going "Come on everybody, Catch a riiiiiiide!"] and the little boss subtitles are worth a chuckle.

But I still find Fallout funnier. I dread to think how many creatures and humans I've seen slowly separate into several different pieces and fly off in other directions thanks to the wonder of V.A.T.S. I find the plot so much more gripping, there is a stupidly large amount of things to do even if you have finished the main plot. [Took my first character 95 hours to reach the point of 'Okay, done every quest and sub-quest and free-roam quest and achievement I can earn being an evil piece of work, time to roll a new one' 95 hours, baring in mind, after I'd already hit max level of 20 back when the game was still fresh, then went and did all the side quests, THEN the DLC was released with the increased level cap, so I dread to think how much lovely EXP I wasted]

I personally think Fallout3 looks a hell of a lot better, even if the world is the usual shades of grey and brown, but it LOOKS like an area that has been in complete decay since nuclear bombs fell 200 years previous. The main radio station in the game [that's right, radio, still alive and kicking in post-apocalyptica!] has some music that you really wouldn't think would work with the game, but strangely, is to this day one of the best soundtracks to a video game I've ever heard. Whereas Borderlands just has a kind of random background track. If Borderlands had at least given me the choice of listening to "No Rest for the Wicked" in game instead of just on the intro I'd have probably enjoyed it that slightly bit more.

Anyway this is turning into one long comparison.

I'd say go for Fallout if your looking for a truly post apocalyptic game with a single player campaign that should last you quite sometime [If you go looking for the extra quests and randomly like to explore new areas]

But if you are looking for multiplayer co-op chuckles, with a crazy large amount of guns [whom only slightly vary due to stats tbh], and enjoy getting zerg-rushed by large amounts of mobs [at least, they rush the fuck out of you in Single Player], get Borderlands.
 

JDNickless

New member
Nov 4, 2009
8
0
0
I'd say Fallout 3, but that's probably just because I haven't got into Borderlands properly. I only got it two days ago. I did love my Fallout though.